We have learned that organizational change is a process rather than an event. It often starts with knowing what to change, continues through how to change, and then concludes with when to change. Using these steps as a foundation, present 6 pages paper that addresses the following:
Research organizations in KSA that, in the past three years, have completed a major change to their organization (e.g., merged with or acquired another firm, expanded operations, significantly reduced staff, etc.).
Provide a brief summary of the organization and the reasons for the recent change.
Present the steps or process the organization followed, from the initiation of the change process to the implementation of the change. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook did they use or do you think they used to analyze organizational dynamics?
Discuss the stakeholders who were included in the process and indicate what their roles were.
Finally, discuss the key processes/strategies which were successful, the key processes/strategies which were not successful, and advice or suggestions you would offer (based on what you have learned thus far in this course) which may result in a more successful change initiative in the future. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook would you suggest they use to analyze organizational dynamics?
important note: ( below note is from the prof)
Regarding critical thinking papers, I spend an exorbinate amount of time reviewing the content of each paper. Therefore, be sure that you fully answer the assignment questions, and also include the necessary and relevant research to support your thesis and major points throughout the paper. In general, we look for 1 to 3 citations per page.
In writing the paper, I would offer some hints that may be of help. Though a majority of your paper is assessed through content, some grammar/punctuation tips may be of value:
First is to follow APA formatting, including a title. A single double space is done between references and between paragraphs, and be sure to indent the first sentence in each paragraph (~ 5 spaces) of the body of your paper. A good hint is to utilize a well-written APA formatted paper and then ‘type’ over the paper. In that way, you are always assured of having the right format.
Second is to include a solid thesis statement, which is the main point you are making in your paper. It is the one thing that you want your audience to remember about your paper. Everything else in your paper is built around that key statement (which is usually the second or third sentence of your paper).
Third is to keep your paragraphs between 3-5 sentences. This is why newspapers typically have small paragraphs; the reader thinks it will be quicker to read it and it is also easier to read. Your shorter paragraphs should be combined, and your longer paragraphs that contain more than 1 thought/point should be separated. A general rule is that paragraphs should not be more than half a page (fold a page in half)
Fourth are several key mistakes to avoid: avoid writing in first person, do not use contractions (e.g., can’t or don’t), avoid generalizing (“everyone does it,” “most people,” etc.), avoid ending sentences with a preposition, and spell out words that make up an acronym the first time you use them
Josh Chaplin "The Earth would be an altogether different spot without the moon. Talk about… " The facts demonstrate that without the moon, the earth would be a less sentimental spot. Legendary werewolves could never have been considered, nor would we have a schedule dependent on the idea of the lunar stages. It has without a doubt affected human culture over centuries, however can the equivalent be said for our neighboring divine satellite in topographical terms? An apparently immaterial piece of shake in correlation, it very well may be difficult to understand that the moon has had such possibly noteworthy effects on molding the earth as it shows up today. Be that as it may, as it appears, a chain of occasions were gotten under way from the moment the moon was framed which have left us here confused by it, yet have left us here in any case. The heft of the moon's duty regarding affecting upon the planet lies with its attractive energy and vicinity to the earth. Such a situation takes into account it to affect the tides of our seas, which thusly serves to slow the world's revolution and heave the moon further away from us. The gravitational fascination of the moon is additionally the settling factor in a divine fight between the huge assortments of the nearby planetary group to startle the planet's hub obliquity. The very reality that the moon is here in any case recounts how blessed the effect that shaped it was, on the grounds that were it not for that unassuming crash over 4.5 billion years prior, life on earth would be inconceivably extraordinary today in any event (and possibly even missing at the very least). Its essence has additionally invigorated the utilization of science and actuated superstition in ages of people, while giving all out sunlight based shrouds which are an all around uncommon, characterizing part of earth. The normal month to month cycle of the lunar stages has additionally been connected to mating groupings, chasing ceremonies and even the menstrual cycle, which 51% of the world's human populace will involvement for a huge amount of their lives. Over the majority of this, the moon has characterized the view of the night sky alongside the stars and mirrored the daylight to hose its pitch dark dimness since days of yore, accomplishing ubiquity in a huge number of present day media. "The earth would be an altogether different spot without the moon". It just appears to be judicious to start with the most punctual ordered appearance of the moon. The most generally acknowledged current hypothesis for its development is revolved around a speculative protoplanet by the name of Theia. It is proposed to have been around the size of Mars, and about 10% of the mass of the earth.  Isotope examination of lunar rocks repurchased from the Apollo mission discloses to us that Theia is conjectured to have crashed into the earth at 4.527 ± 0.010 billion years before present.  Earth as it was in those days would have been completely changed by this effect, modifying its creation and at last enabling it to turn into the planet it is today. This impact would have additionally created a lot of flotsam and jetsam, which would have along these lines accumulated to frame the moon.  This is the main doable model which clarifies why the moon winds up in circle with the earth; physical science based electronic reproductions demonstrate that it would not have been conceivable to catch a going by moon with the gravitational field of the earth, nor would it have been conceivable to start from launch of material from the liquid earth because of parting by outward power.  Assuming that this theory is right, clearly earth has been broadly changed as a result of the moon. For one, upon effect, material from the thick iron center of Theia would probably have sunk towards the center of earth because of gravity, while mantle material would almost certainly have been accumulated onto the outside of the early earth.  This is the purpose behind the trademark inward layers of the earth today. The moon would have then framed from abundance material from the effect combining in the encompassing regions of the early earth. In this manner, the development of the moon both included and removed material from the early earth, vigorously affecting its very organization from as right on time as 4.537 Ga. ,  http://www.propagation.gatech.edu/ECE6390/venture/Fall2012/Team06/Webpage%20Folder/Webpage%20Folder/img/radiation1.pngHaving thought about that this moon-framing effect would have been a noteworthy wellspring of a great part of the earthbound iron found on earth today, the size of our iron-nickel center would have been legitimately influenced by it. The world's mantle synthetically separated in an occasion called the iron fiasco, all through the initial 500 million years of the planet's arrangement. Very huge amounts of iron surrendered to gravity and sunk to frame the center. The deepest piece of the earth was in this manner contained conductive components, an iron-nickel combination, which ended up ready to produce electrical flows while turning due to the coriolis impact in communication with convection in the mantle  (which started in any case from warmth getting away from the center). Therefore, the generally dipolar magnetosphere was considered, offering ascend to the radioactive Van Allen Belts by catching charged protons and electrons in concentric groups encompassing the planet.  Figure 1 above is a scaled portrayal of the undetectable magnetosphere and Van Allen belts encompassing the earth. Just found in 1958, the notoriously 'destructive' belts have been unvoiced yet key in the advancement of life on our planet. This is because of the particles' capacity to anticipate awful ionizing radiation to arrive at the outside of the earth and successfully fry anything which at any point tried to exist superficially. The magnetosphere itself would likewise have counteracted any charged particles of sun powered breeze from arriving at the world's surface and causing comparable harm. Among different factors, the quality of the world's attractive field would be legitimately corresponding to the size of the center as indicated by dynamo hypothesis,  and consequently we have the moon-framing effect to thank for a cordial and pleasant planet. It's subsequently reasonable for state that without the moon coming into fulfillment, the earth may never have done either. There are progressively evident continuous impacts of the moon on the earth today however, than there were back in the Hadean. It is genuinely basic information that the moon has effect on the tides of our oceans and seas. Alongside the sun, it delivers the twice-day by day rise and fall of the oceans that boggled beach front tenants for centuries preceding Newton's plan of the all inclusive law of attraction in 1687. Normally, the gravitational fascination between two separate substances is conversely corresponding to the separation between them.  Thus, while the sun might be approximately multiple times as enormous as the moon, it is (unintentionally) around multiple times further away than it, thus applies less impact over the tides.  The zone of the earth nearest to the moon at some random point will see a projection of its seas, as the water is pulled in to the moon's gravitational field.  Simultaneously on the contrary side of the earth farthest from the moon, the outside layer itself surrenders to the lunar attraction and is, as a result, http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/moon-8.gifmarginally died down, creating an extra maritime lump.  Figure 2 (right) represents and explains this gravitational marvel, by marginally overstating the potential lump of the tides! Nonetheless, contingent upon the geography of shoreline areas and nature of mainland inclines far and wide, the variance can differ fiercely among low and elevated tides.  In extraordinary cases, this can influence the jobs of littoral occupants by managing angling timetables or placing their homes in threat, demonstrating how the moon truly is a premier effect on making the earth the spot it is. One such situation is the unprecedented tidal range at the Bay of Funday in Eastern Canada, which can outperform 12 meters.  Circumstances like this can happen upon the landing of 'spring' tides (from the German action word springen, 'to jump', not from the name of the period) whereby the sun and moon adjust, causing greatest fascination toward them and in this manner intensifying the stature of the tides.  Alas, the moon is a tyrannical specialist on the tides of our seas, and apparently has been since the seas conformed to 3.8 billion years prior. Washing and swashing the seas for ages of land time has not gone by without its results be that as it may. The moon's gravity has made the tides from one viewpoint, while the pivot of the earth has somewhat balanced the area of them on the other; the real area of the crested tidal lump is marginally in front of where it would intelligently be, at the nearest point on the world's surface to the moon.  subsequently, a shockingly enormous measure of mass (the tidal projection of the seas) is balanced somewhat from the nearest area on earth to the moon by then, implying that a specific amount of the gravitational force is no longer legitimately between the earth and moon, however at a 90° point to it.  Thus, torque is viably made between the two planetary bodies,  and is regularly called 'tidal erosion,' 'tidal increasing speed' or 'tidal braking'. This implies the nearness of the moon makes our trademark 24 hour days extend by around 2.3 milliseconds consistently.  Taking Newton's third law of equivalent and inverse responses into record, the earth is additionally pushing the moon away by 3.82±0.007 cm every year because of this 'torque'.  Would the majority of this truly mean however that without the moon, the earth would be an altogether different spot? Extrapolating back so as to 4 billion years prior discloses to us that the moon was exactly 15,000 km closer. Tidal powers would have been enormous, with theorized steady tidal wave w>GET ANSWER