Healthcare administrators are required to assess the financial and organizational health of health services delivery operations. They are often called upon to present strategies for fundraising for those organizations and must present to a variety of stakeholders, from the public to the board of directors. You’ll gain a better understanding of this process in this multipart assignment with deadlines over several weeks of the term. ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS Assume the role of a CEO who is tasked with reviewing the organization’s current state and defining strategic goals to take your organization in a specified direction. To accomplish this, you will need to complete the following: PART 3 – FINANCIAL HEALTH ANALYSIS AND FUNDRAISING PLAN » Consider stakeholders, board members and overall organizational structure. » Are there multiple stakeholders with competing financial interests? If so, how would you negotiate and navigate through the differences? » Is the organization governed by a board of directors? Is it for profit or nonprofit? » Is it funded by stakeholders or the government? » Analyze the health of the organization’s financial report, review current budget and make recommendations for fundraising. » How did the organization perform last fiscal year? » What are some areas of great expenses that should be reviewed and curbed? » Are there possible opportunities for new streams of revenue? » How does your SWOT analysis inform the financial aspect or future financial growth of this organization?
MARX AND MILL'S VIEWS ON FREEDOM. This exposition investigates Karl Marx and J.S. Factory on their understandings of opportunity and their examinations of the obstructions to its acknowledgment. Both Marx and Mill concur that individuals are equipped for gaining ground and that the idea of flexibility is an end in itself. In this manner, they considered opportunity to be a way to acknowledge singular potential and self-assurance. Be that as it may, both vary on the idea of opportunity acknowledgment and the obstructions to flexibility. Plant contends that the hindrance to opportunity is the manly society while Marx contends that the obstruction to flexibility is the bourgeoisie. Moreover, the paper examines the mediation by state/society into opportunity. Factory affirm that the general public can meddle into somebody's opportunity when there is hurt done to others. For Mill opportunity ought to be practiced insofar as there is no mischief done to others while Marx underpins the flexibility to oust the bourgeoisie . Then again, Marx sees hold that the administration/society ought to intercede in singular opportunity to stay away from independence that prompts private property and subsequently making classes. Both Marx and Mill consider opportunity to be an end in itself. As indicated by Marx's meaning of opportunity, was seen as an end in itself. "Just in group has every individual the methods for developing his endowments every which way; just in the group, thusly, is close to home flexibility conceivable. In the past substitutes for the group, in the State, and so on individual flexibility has existed just for the people who created inside the connections of the decision class, and just seeing that they were people of this class," Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. For Mill, the right to speak freely, assessment and the privilege to connect with others, were essential for the advance of humanity. Opportunity of decision is and do what is alluring insofar as no mischief is done to others is an end in itself. As Mill subsequently say that , "… however the traditions be both great as traditions… yet to fit in with custom… does not… create… human resources… practiced just in settling on a decision." (Mill 60). It is apparent that flexibility of decision is vital to the advancement of independence and advance of the general public overall. In this manner, opportunity is an end in itself, on the grounds that using human prompt settle on decisions is useful for self-improvement. Consequently, the view that considers opportunity to be an end in itself can be ascribed to both Marx and Mill. Then again, there are impressive contrasts amongst Mill and Marx points of view on sees in regards to opportunity. For Mill, flexibility is critical to search for truth and for motivations to live and for advance ( Mill 29). Factory states that a man must be allowed to seek after his bliss and joy. Besides, Mill in "On Liberty" attests that individual flexibility is the principal boss for the advance of society. The sentiment of the individual must be supported and permitted to develop with the goal that he can utilize his advantages and gifts to profit the general public everywhere ( Mill 63). In this manner, Mill, can be condensed in On Liberty : "The main flexibility which merits the name, is that of seeking after our own great in our own specific manner, inasmuch as we don't endeavor to deny others of theirs, or hinder their endeavors to get it." An individual has the capacity and the ability to be innovative in a general public that perceives that capacity. Too, Mill contends for the right to speak freely for everybody and that every individual sentiment ought to be regarded paying little mind to its substance. Factory additionally contends that flexibility/freedom is imperative for the quest for joy (Mill 29). However , Marx declares that individuals ought not be individualistic and ought not seek after their own advantages but rather should fit in with the general public's standards. For instance in "On The Jewish Question: Zur Judenfrage, " Marx condemns the liberal idea of opportunity and contends that it accept that an individual is "a confined monad" ( Max 364) who seeks after his own private satisfaction and furthermore tries to evade struggle with others ( Marx 370). He contend that an individual can't be dealt with independently from society. The individual is an integral part of society and there is no place he/she will work in disengagement without influencing the general public overall. Thus, Marx contends that the socialist framework would make it feasible for everybody including kids and ladies to be free as they would not be compelled to work for the anybody (Marx 72). For Marx, this is flexibility. Also, Marx clarifies how "my free movement" changes itself into "the distanced and unfeeling force" with the fetishism of the ware. (Marx, 554). Moreover, Mill and Marx offer an alternate point of view on the intercession by state/society into flexibility. Plant contends that there is no defense for meddling in other individuals' feelings and considering. Not in any case the administration has the privilege to meddle in somebody's flexibility. It could be contended this is the establishment of present day singular opportunity. You are free and qualified for your own particular sentiments as long as you don't hurt another ( Mill 4). "The explanation behind not meddling, unless for others, with a man's intentional demonstrations, is thought for his freedom. His willful decision is confirm that what he so picks is alluring, or possibly bearable, to him, and his great is all in all best given to him by enabling him to take his own particular methods for seeking after it," Mill (14). Conversely, Marx contends that there is a requirement for the state to meddle with private property so property possession may be canceled. The administration ought to have the privilege and the way to control the general population who have private property, in this way framing a perfect socialist society. It must be noticed that Marx 's contentions depended on the view that private enterprise was detestable and thus should have been supplanted by socialism. Too, Karl Marx, in On the Jewish Question says that "None of the assumed privileges of man go past the selfish man, man as he is an individual from common society; that is, an individual isolated from the group, pulled back into himself, entirely distracted with his private advantages and acting as per his private eccentricity." Hence, a man needs to comply with the general public's standards. In this way, Marx sees counter-contend the view by Mill that the general public should regard the individual opportunity. Then again, Mill cautions against the tranny of the greater part in light of the fact that occasionally the larger part's supposition isn't generally right. In this manner the assurance of the individual is more critical and must be ensured. Likewise, Mill's and Marx' sees vary on the activity of flexibility. As indicated by Mill, flexibility and freedom is having unrestrained choice and self-assurance without being subjected to constant law ( Mill 32). Factory includes that advancement and imagination can be accomplished in a free situation . In this way, he advocates for a free domain which takes into account improvement and development of new thoughts. "Virtuoso can just inhale openly in anatmosphereof opportunity. People of virtuoso are … moreindividual than some other individuals" ( Mill, 65). Along these lines, opportunity of the individual will permit new thoughts and result in the advance of the general public in general. Too, he contends that the general public or the state ought not compel individuals to adjust to the specific standards of the general public and nor mediate in the exercises of the person which add to the improvement of the group overall. Be that as it may, Mill recognizes that the main time when the administration or the general public needs to meddle is the point at which it ventures in to keep your hurting other individuals (Mill 68). In this manner, Mill declares that flexibility ought to be practiced insofar as there is no mischief done to others. Plant, a man's flexibility must be ensured and permitted to be investigated without encroaching on other individuals' opportunity. All things considered, the practicing of opportunity ought to be checked. Moreover, Marx contends that most of the average workers should battle for their flexibility and beat the oppression of the bourgeoisie (Marx 73). This appears like the perspectives of Mill who contends that the residents are to have flexibility and the state, which is in little minority, ought not practice oppression over them. Plant, then again, contends that the opportunity to join must be done such that there isn't damage to others . Plant would see the contention of Marx pushing the oust and taking the property of the bourgeoisie as mischief done to others. In the Manifesto, Marx requires the flexibility of the regular workers to join together and at last to rebel against the creation proprietors otherwise called Bourgeoisie (Marx and Engels, 34). The common laborers will ascend for their opportunity. Marx states that flexibility can be accomplished through philosophy. On the off chance that the average workers would learn and know the belief system of the bourgeoisie, they would have the capacity to build up a counter philosophy and consequently the low class would wind up reluctant and mindful and hence have the capacity to oversee and control the methods for creation (Marx 173.) Thus, Marx contends that the common laborers would be liberated from distanced work on the off chance that they knew the philosophy of the bourgeoisie. This is the way the working class would have the capacity to beat the abuse of the bourgeoisie. For Marx, the common laborers ought to be joined together and battle for their individual opportunity . Too, as per Marx, flexibility could be accomplished if the common laborers possessed the methods for generation. It can likewise be seen that entrepreneur framework kicks the bucket flexibility to the common laborers in the cutting edge period. For instance, regardless of whether you want to have a specific sort of work, you are not allowed to pick your manager. On a similar point the general population who controls the methods for creation have the flexibility to pick among the plenitude supply of work. I would concur that socialism in which the methods for creation is claimed by numerous could have been a decent society for humankind. Private enterprise precludes the opportunity from claiming decisions to numerous individuals particularly poor people. It le>GET ANSWER