Compare and contrast the method and approach taken by Anselm & Aquinas to
rationally prove the existence of God. In your reply consider some of the following;
What is the difference between an Ontological and Cosmological approach?
How is an a priori form of reasoning different from an a posteriori form of reasoning?
Aquinas’ argument relies upon reasons and evidence? What is the evidence?
Anselm proves his point from reason alone. What are his reasons?
What are some of the rational assumptions that Aquinas relies upon. For example; Is it reasonably
compelling to reject an infinite regress? Explain.
How does the difference between contingency and necessity impact these arguments?
Is relying upon reason alone a sufficient condition to prove something exist? Explain.
Sample Solution
