A formal analysis includes an analysis of the forms appearing in the work you have
chosen. These forms give the work its expression, message, or meaning. A formal
analysis assumes a work of art is (1) a constructed object (2) that has been created with a
stable meaning (even though it might not be clear to the viewer) (3) that can be
ascertained by studying the relationships between the elements of the work. To aid in
writing a formal analysis, you should think as if you were describing the work of art to
someone who has never seen it before. When your reader finishes reading your analysis,
she/he should have a complete mental picture of what the work looks like. Yet, the
formal analysis is more than just a description of the work. It should also include a thesis
statement that reflects your conclusions about the work. The thesis statement may, in
general, answer a question like these: What do I think is the meaning of this work? What
is the message that this work or artist sends to the viewer? What is this work all about?
The thesis statement is an important element. It sets the tone for the entire paper, and
sets it apart from being a merely descriptive paper.
Your essay must include the following:

  1. A photo of the work you selected to write about (taken by you at the
    museum!);
  2. Artist, Title, Date, and Medium;
  3. A Thesis statement: The thesis for this essay states what you feel is the overall
    meaning of the work and how the various formal elements come together to
    express this meaning.
  4. A detailed description of the work based on your observations of the actual
    work at the museum . Things to consider are line, color, composition, scale,
    and specific materials used. How does these formal elements influence the
    viewer’s understanding of the specific subject matter?
  5. An examination of the way the form/style and subject matter of the work
    relate to larger ideas associated with its movement and its historical period.
    This portion of the essay can be supported by evidence from the lecture and
    class readings, no additional research should be performed.
    Guidelines & Tips
    A formal analysis should include not only a description of the piece, but especially those
    details of the work that have led you to come to your thesis. Yet, your paper should not
    be a random flow of ideas about the work (i.e. stream of consciousness writing). Rather,
    your paper should have a sense of order, moving purposefully through your description
    with regard to specific elements (ex: one paragraph may deal with composition, another
    with a description of the figures, another with the background, another about line, etc.).
    Finally, in your conclusion (the final paragraph) you should end your paper with a
    restatement of your thesis.
    It is important to remember that your interest here is strictly formal; NO RESEARCH IS
    TO BE USED IN THIS PAPER. In other words, you are strictly relying on your ability to
    visually ‘read’ a work of art and make interpretations about it based on your analysis of
    it. Remember too that your analysis should not be just a mechanical, physical description.
    Please use descriptive language and adjectives to describe your work. Begin with a
    general description of the work, and then move on to the more specific elements.
    Things to consider when writing a formal analysis (in no particular order):
  6. Record your first impression(s) of the artwork. What stands out? Is there a
    focal point (an area to which the artist wants your eye to be drawn)? If so,
    what formal elements led you to this conclusion? Your impressions can help
    you reach your thesis.
  7. What is the subject of the artwork?
  8. Composition: How are the parts of the work arranged? Is there a stable or
    unstable composition? Is it dynamic? Full of movement? Or is it static?
  9. Pose: If the work has figures, are the proportions believable? Realistic?
    Describe the pose(s). Is the figure active, calm, graceful, stiff, tense, or
    relaxed? Does the figure convey a mood? If there are several figures, how do
    they relate to each other (do they interact? not?)?
  10. Proportions: Does the whole or even individual parts of the figure(s) or natural
    objects in the work look natural? Why did you come to this conclusion?
  11. Line: Are the outlines (whether perceived or actual) smooth, fuzzy, clear? Are
    the main lines vertical, horizontal, diagonal, or curved, or a combination of any
    of these? Are the lines jagged and full of energy? Sketchy? Geometric?
    Curvilinear? Bold? Subtle?
  12. Space: If the artist conveys space, what type of space is used? What is the
    relation of the main figure to the space around it? Are the main figures
    entirely within the space (if the artwork is a painting), or are parts of the
    bodies cut off by the edge of the artwork? Is the setting illusionistic, as if one
    could enter the space of the painting, or is it flat and two-dimensional, a space
    that one could not possibly enter?
  13. Texture: If a sculpture, is the surface smooth and polished or rough? Are there
    several textures conveyed? Where and How? If a painting, is there any texture
    to the paint surface? Are the brushstrokes invisible? Brushy? Sketchy? Loose
    and flowing? Or tight and controlled?
  14. Light and Shadow: Are shadows visible? Where? Are there dark shadows, light
    shadows, or both? How do the shadows affect the work?
    10.Size: How big is the artwork? Are the figures or objects in the work life-sized,
    larger or smaller than life? How does the size affect the work?
    11.Color: What type of colors are used in the work? Bright? Dull?
    Complimentary? Does the artist use colors to draw your attention to specific
    areas of the work? How? If a sculpture, examine the color(s) of the medium
    and how it affects the work.
    12.Mood: Do you sense an overall mood in the artwork? Perhaps several
    different moods? If so, describe them. How does the mood interpret how you
    view the work?
    Once you have spent some time analyzing your work, notice if your first impression of
    the work has changed, now that you have taken a closer look? How? If you came up with
    a thesis statement before doing this in-depth analysis, you may want to change it if your
    impression of the work has changed. Your thesis statement should reflect your view of
    the object.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer