Different aspects of Genisis and Matthews?
Part I: Articulating the Christian perception of the place of love within the Scriptures. In this section, you will be presenting, to the best of your ability, how Christianity would attempt to articulate ideas based upon your Scripture selections.
1. Identify and explain how one passage from the Old Testament and one passage from the New Testament (which were read as part of the course) are interrelated and conducive to discussing the Christian understanding of love. Note that the passages do not necessarily need to be talking about love overtly. They may be passages, for example, which themselves support the understanding of God’s love and loving activities.
2. Identify a second, underlying or related theme within your selected passages that is theologically connected to the theme of love that is found in the passages you selected for step 1. Explain how this theme is related to and supports the topic of love in the passages selected.
3. Identify and explain how Verbum Domini or Dei verbum contains elements which help to make sense of your presentation of the scripture passages. This section will require at least the use of two quotations with effort spent thoroughly explaining your choices.
Part II
1. Formulate your own response to the integration you articulated in part one of the paper. You may agree with it and add arguments or disagree with it and consider critical arguments. This second section of the paper will begin with a thesis statement in the form of either: “I agree…” or “I disagree…”
2. In this second part of the paper, you will integrate your own understandings of God, yourself, and the world with the material in the course and specifically your selected passages.
3. In this section, you will need to consider and explain at least one counterargument to your rationale. You must respond to the counterargument and explain your response.

 

Sample Solution

One passage from the Old Testament that is conducive to discussing the Christian understanding of love is found in Deuteronomy 6:4–5 which states “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.” This passage emphasizes how important it is to have a deep and sincere love for God by putting Him first above everything else. It also serves as an example of how we should show love towards others , since if we can truly devote ourselves to loving God then this same devotion would be applicable when showing affection towards our fellow humans .

The New Testament passage which relates to this concept comes from John 3:16 which states “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” Here we see an even more powerful display of divinely inspired love whereby Jesus himself was sacrificed so as to save mankind from its sins . Consequently , this shows us just how much value humanity has in His eyes and it serves as reminder about how each individual should strive for similar selfless acts when displaying their own brand of compassion towards others.. In other words , both these passages demonstrate a strong commitment towards loving those around us not just because it is demanded by law or tradition but because it reflects true empathy .

Sample Solution

One passage from the Old Testament that is conducive to discussing the Christian understanding of love is found in Deuteronomy 6:4–5 which states “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.” This passage emphasizes how important it is to have a deep and sincere love for God by putting Him first above everything else. It also serves as an example of how we should show love towards others , since if we can truly devote ourselves to loving God then this same devotion would be applicable when showing affection towards our fellow humans .

The New Testament passage which relates to this concept comes from John 3:16 which states “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” Here we see an even more powerful display of divinely inspired love whereby Jesus himself was sacrificed so as to save mankind from its sins . Consequently , this shows us just how much value humanity has in His eyes and it serves as reminder about how each individual should strive for similar selfless acts when displaying their own brand of compassion towards others.. In other words , both these passages demonstrate a strong commitment towards loving those around us not just because it is demanded by law or tradition but because it reflects true empathy .

Transient memory is the memory for a boost that goes on for a brief time (Carlson, 2001). In reasonable terms visual transient memory is frequently utilized for a relative reason when one can’t thoroughly search in two spots immediately however wish to look at least two prospects. Tuholski and partners allude to momentary memory similar to the attendant handling and stockpiling of data (Tuholski, Engle, and Baylis, 2001).

They additionally feature the way that mental capacity can frequently be antagonistically impacted by working memory limit. It means quite a bit to be sure about the typical limit of momentary memory as, without a legitimate comprehension of the flawless cerebrum’s working it is challenging to evaluate whether an individual has a shortage in capacity (Parkin, 1996).

 

This survey frames George Miller’s verifiable perspective on transient memory limit and how it tends to be impacted, prior to bringing the examination state-of-the-art and outlining a determination of approaches to estimating momentary memory limit. The verifiable perspective on momentary memory limit

 

Length of outright judgment

The range of outright judgment is characterized as the breaking point to the precision with which one can distinguish the greatness of a unidimensional boost variable (Miller, 1956), with this cutoff or length generally being around 7 + 2. Mill operator refers to Hayes memory length try as proof for his restricting range. In this members needed to review data read resoundingly to them and results obviously showed that there was a typical maximum restriction of 9 when double things were utilized.

This was regardless of the consistent data speculation, which has proposed that the range ought to be long if each introduced thing contained little data (Miller, 1956). The end from Hayes and Pollack’s tests (see figure 1) was that how much data sent expansions in a straight design alongside how much data per unit input (Miller, 1956). Figure 1. Estimations of memory for data wellsprings of various sorts and bit remainders, contrasted with anticipated results for steady data. Results from Hayes (left) and Pollack (right) refered to by (Miller, 1956)

 

Pieces and lumps

Mill operator alludes to a ‘digit’ of data as need might have arisen ‘to settle on a choice between two similarly probable other options’. In this manner a basic either or choice requires the slightest bit of data; with more expected for additional complicated choices, along a twofold pathway (Miller, 1956). Decimal digits are worth 3.3 pieces each, implying that a 7-digit telephone number (what is handily recollected) would include 23 pieces of data. Anyway an evident inconsistency to this is the way that, assuming an English word is worth around 10 pieces and just 23 pieces could be recollected then just 2-3 words could be recalled at any one time, clearly mistaken. The restricting range can all the more likely be figured out concerning the absorption of pieces into lumps.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer