Faced with the need to deliver risk ratings for your organization, you will have to substitute the organization’s risk preferences for your own. For, indeed, it is the organization’s risk tolerance that the assessment is trying to achieve, not each assessor’s personal risk preferences. Answer below questions:
-What is the risk posture for each particular system as it contributes to the overall risk posture of the organization?
-How does each attack surface – its protections if any, in the presence (or absence) of active threat agents and their capabilities, methods, and goals through each situation—add up to a system’s particular risk posture?
-In addition, how do all the systems’ risks sum up to an organization’s computer security risk posture?
***Western institutions journals for references please

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Assessing Risk Posture: Understanding the Interplay of Systems and Organization

In the realm of cybersecurity, understanding the risk posture of an organization is crucial for effective risk management. It requires evaluating the risk posture of each particular system within the organization and how they contribute to the overall risk posture. This essay will explore the concept of risk posture, the role of attack surfaces and threat agents, and how all system risks sum up to an organization’s computer security risk posture.

Risk Posture of Each System

The risk posture of a particular system refers to its vulnerability and exposure to potential threats. To assess the risk posture, it is important to evaluate the system’s inherent vulnerabilities, the potential impact of a successful attack, and the effectiveness of existing security controls.

Each system within an organization may have different risk postures based on factors such as its criticality, the sensitivity of data it handles, and its connectivity to external networks. For example, a customer database system that stores sensitive personal information would have a higher risk posture compared to an internal employee portal.

Role of Attack Surfaces and Threat Agents

An attack surface represents the potential points of vulnerability in a system that can be exploited by threat agents. It includes hardware, software, network interfaces, and human interactions. Understanding the attack surface allows for a comprehensive assessment of the system’s risk posture.

The presence or absence of active threat agents significantly impacts a system’s risk posture. Threat agents can be individuals, groups, or automated tools with malicious intent. Their capabilities, methods, and goals determine the level of risk a system faces.

For example, if a system has weak authentication mechanisms, it increases the attack surface and makes it more vulnerable to password cracking attacks. If threat agents possess sophisticated hacking techniques and have a specific goal of stealing sensitive customer data, the risk posture of the system becomes even higher.

Summing Up System Risks to Organization’s Computer Security Risk Posture

An organization’s computer security risk posture is an aggregation of the risks posed by all its systems. Each system contributes to the overall risk posture based on its individual vulnerabilities and exposure to threats. By assessing and quantifying the risk postures of all systems, organizations can understand their collective exposure to cyber threats.

To determine the organization’s computer security risk posture, it is necessary to consider factors such as the criticality of systems, interdependencies between systems, and potential cascading effects of a successful attack on one system affecting others.

By conducting comprehensive risk assessments for each system and analyzing their individual risk postures, organizations can identify areas of weakness and prioritize resources to mitigate risks effectively. This allows for informed decision-making regarding investments in security controls and allocation of resources to enhance the overall security posture.

References:

Goel S, Williams T. Cybersecurity Risk Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide. IT Professional. 2018;20(3):20-27.
Stone-Gross B, Cova M, Cavallaro L, Gilbert B, Szydlowski M, Kemmerer R. Your Botnet is My Botnet: Analysis of a Botnet Takeover. In: 16th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. 2009.
Stavrou A, Tabriz P, Cooklev T. The Modern Attack Surface and Its Implications for System Security. IEEE Security & Privacy. 2015;13(5):84-89.
Mellado D, Fernandez-Medina E, Piattini M. A methodology for deriving IT security standards: An empirical application using ISO/IEC 27001. Information & Software Technology. 2015;57:610-621.
Kountanis D, Panaousis E, Karapistoli E, Rizomiliotis P. Quantitative Risk Assessment Models for Cyber Security Investments: Overview and Open Challenges. Journal of Cybersecurity. 2020;6(1):tyaa006.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer