One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process.
In a paper of 1,500-1,750 words, discuss the following:
Consider an opportunity for tracking care improvement. What key information would be needed in the database? Example: Time lapse from medication order documented in the EHR to delivery of medication to the patient for the cardiology service.
Describe the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data. What type of project management strategies and methodologies can be implemented to support informatics initiatives to help improve quality within the clinical practice?
Discuss which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process. What is the role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting?
Outline strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal. Consider communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR, and managing resources (human, fiscal, and health care resources).
Discuss what professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system.
Describe the measures and steps you would take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice?
Explain what leadership skills and theories would be needed to facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?
occurred between January 2007 and January 2010 at the McGill University Student Health Services in Montreal, Canada. Data included reproductive health information, demographic data, and participant preferences related to interventions. The participants completed a questionnaire after the abortion to measure the interventions received. The study found four factors of preferred interventions. The first factor contained upsetting guilt in which the participants strongly preferred assistance with managing guilt. The second factor involved reproductive control; the women stated a strong desire for assistance with prevention of pregnancy. Factor three discussed independent coping where the participants had a strong preference for assistance with coping techniques. Factor four entailed assistance with spirituality where the young women wished for assistance with spirituality related to the grief and loss associated with abortion. Ninety-eight percent of participants wanted a professional intervention offered in relation to abortion care (Curley, M., & Johnston, C. (2014). The authors emphasized the psychological effects of abortion on young women and analyzed possible methods for assisting with the management of psychological distress. Participants personal preferences in abortion care were identified and insight on potential program development was provided to help young women cope with the psychological distress associated with abortions. Iverson, Litwack, Pineles, Suvak, Vaughn, & Resick (2013), engineered a level IV prospective research design analyzing intimate partner violence. The purpose of the study was to review the effects of PTSD symptoms and the coping strategies used to combat them to determine the possibility of a reoccurrence of intimate partner violence on female victims. Women selected for analysis experienced intimate partner violence for 3 months minimum in the past year with reports of a minimum of two severe acts of violence or four minimal acts of violence, but the most recent experience was between two weeks to six months prior to the study. Sixty-nine women were selected to complete a baseline assessment and a follow-up assessment six months later. Four assessment scales were administered to each woman, “the Conflict Tactics Scale-2 (CTS-2), the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II), and the Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI)” (Iverson et al., p. 104, 2013). After the assessments were completed the researches provided a post-conference and a safety presentation to the women. Roughly 46% of the women experienced a minimum of one revictimization at the 6-month follow update. The authors found women who cope with disengagement experience higher risks, whereas women who engaged in engagement coping styles experienced lower risks of revictimizations (Iverson et al., 2013). The article was organized, concise, and well written and it did achieve the purpose of the research. The study emphasized the importance of appropriate and effective coping strategies. Unhealthy coping techniques do not help alleviate the situation and can affect the woman negatively by increasing the chances of her becoming revictimized. Romero, D. H., Riggs, S. A., & Ruggero, C. (2015) conducted an inquiry reviewing the>GET ANSWER