Respond to one of the following prompts in a 750-word essay. Your answer should include direct references to the text, cited using Chicago-style footnotes. There is no need to include a full citation of the book; just the page number from which you pulled the quote or information is acceptable. At the end of the essay, tell me the word count and put that in bold. The book used for this is: Benjamin Franklin, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, Edited by Joyce Chaplin (New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 2012). Remember, you are only choosing one of the following questions and writing a 750-word essay on it from this book.
- What does Franklin’s Autobiography tell us about eighteenth-century America? What does it omit?
- How does the audience for the Autobiography shift between Parts One and Two? Why is this shift significant?
- To what extent is the Franklin of the Autobiography a fair representation of the historical Franklin as opposed to yet another persona created by the writer Benjamin Franklin?
- Using the Autobiography and other documents in the volume, how might you characterize Franklin’s political views?
- Late in life, Franklin came to oppose slavery. Are there signs in the Autobiography that indicate he might one day take this position? What is Franklin’s argument for abolition and for the care of the emancipated slaves?
it was not (McIntosh 2005). Killing an adversary patch at wartime would not be considered as unlawful however could be considered a criminal demonstration if the killing occurred s during a blade battle in a bar (Browne et al. 2016). Same sex relationship was recently viewed as unlawful in 1967 in the England and Wales. Be that as it may, this changed in 2014, and same sex marriage is presently legitimate (Harper et al. 2014). Crosswise over societies proof has demonstrated that what is viewed as a wrongdoing or freak can shift crosswise over societies and society. For instance, in certain pieces of Nigeria, female circumcision is socially worthy without any laws against guilty parties (Gbadebo et al. 2015). Anyway in western social orders like the UK, this is viewed as a wrongdoing with extreme punishments. On account of liquor, it is commonly not a wrongdoing to devour. Be that as it may, drinking while at work would freak at work. Further, driving affected by liquor would be a wrongdoing. In Muslim people group with severe liquor rules, drinking any measure of liquor would be viewed as both freak conduct just as a wrongdoing (Al-Ansari et al. 2016). A few hypothetical methodologies have been utilized to endeavor to clarify the ideas of wrongdoing and aberrance. In this exposition, two of such would be applied; the functionalists approach and the organic. As indicated by the functionalist hypothesis, wrongdoing and abnormality emerge because of the manner in which a general public is organized. Functionalists have the perspective that common standards and qualities are imperative to social request and the accomplishment of society. Durkeheim, a key advocate of the hypothesis contended that wrongdoing and aberrance structure an inescapable piece of public activity because of the various levels to which people are focused on the mutual worth and good convictions of society which depends on their own encounters. Durheheim accepts that wrongdoing and aberrance have a few advantages to society as a token of the ethical limits, as a methods for growing new thoughts, through serving to discharging worries in the public eye and furthermore as a notice gadget that the general public isn't working appropriately. Anyway a lot of wrongdoing is broken for the general public and could turn into a risk to social request (Browne et al. 2016). Merton another functionalist scholar created on Durheim's thoughts. He recommended that social request depends on accord around social objectives and the endorsed pathways to accomplishing those objectives. Be that as it may, some of the time society is organized so that not every person has the chance to meet these objectives by applying the endorsed methods or following the affirmed pathways. Henceforth, such people could depend on freak conduct as their type of adjustment. As per Merton, such people face a feeling of strain and anomie as the principles around how to meet the set social objectives doesn't address their issues. Merton's strain hypothesis is useful as it endeavors to interface the structure of society to wrongdoing and aberrance. Notwithstanding, the vast majority who experience strain don't turn to wrongdoing and abnormality. This would seem to debilitate his hypothesis and clarification (Blundell et al. 2009). The natural methodology proposes wrongdoing is acquired and that an anomaly in the hereditary cosmetics of people make them to go to wrongdoing. Lombroso, a 19thCentury Italian Criminologist was a significant organic methodology scholar. He proposed that crooks>GET ANSWER