This is part of team work. You need to come up with a bad interview with a mental illness person. Please use the documents as much as you can.
Communication skills are essential to good policing. This piece of assessment focuses on communication skills, particularly in relation to the police interview.
The interview script must include both verbal and non-verbal cues from both participants and may include descriptions of what is physically happening (people’s movement or body language).
Each critique should be referenced, with a minimum of 10 scholarly sources used to support what makes the interview effective or ineffective. The same references can be used for both reflections if desired (the total number of references across the two critiques must be at least 10).
It may be easiest to examine the literature on communication and police interviewing prior to writing your scripts. From the literature you can select a few points that are important and that you can demonstrate in your script. Your readings for the subject should be your first point of call. These can (and should) be included in your references.
Write: 1 x 1000 word script of an interview with a mental illness people that is an example of bad interview practice.
Just come up a bad interview is fine.
As an individual you will also submit a 500 word reflection of your specific contribution to the group project (what part of the overall project you worked on), the contributions of others and any notes about the experience. This is a confidential piece of assessment (not seen by other group members), designed to get you reflecting on your group work experience and what you have learnt from it.
You can just come up some that I will change it don’t worry (for the reflection).
I will upload some documents that might help with the assessment. Please use that as much as you can.
What are the suggestions for a firm that does not lead CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is regularly mixed up for a 21st century trendy expression when in reality it has been a piece of the business vocabulary for a considerable length of time. While some contend that the idea goes back to the Industrial Revolution, the main substantive work was composed by Peter Drucker in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. In spite of the progression of time, there is still no widespread meaning of CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility, what it is and how it is executed, is diverse relying on the nation a business works inside, the administrative framework they are liable to and even the business inside which they work. These entanglements aside, it is important to settle on balanced meaning of CSR keeping in mind the end goal to basically talk about the idea in this paper. The definition offered by the International Organization for Standardization will be utilized, as it is general in nature and pertinent to most organizations, in any case their nation of activity: "Social obligation is the duty of an association for the effects of its choices and exercises on society and nature, through straightforward and moral conduct that: adds to manageable advancement, including the wellbeing and the welfare of society considers the desires of partners is in consistence with pertinent law and predictable with universal standards of conduct; and Is coordinated all through the association and rehearsed in its connections." (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) They one shortcoming in this definition is the recommendation that CSR is about consistence with relevant law. In Dahlsrud's (2008) examination of 37 CSR definitions, he distinguished five basic measurements. The principal measurement is the earth and its thought in business tasks and the second is the social measurement which covers organizations considering their effect on society. Both of these measurements are fundamental to our working definition. The third measurement distinguished is the monetary measurement which searches for a promise to incorporating CSR into business tasks is additionally present similar to the fourth measurement which identified with how organizations ought to deal with all partner bunches in a socially dependable way (Dahlsrud, 2008). The last measurement, intentionality, is what is absent from the ISO definition. Dahlsrud (2008) characterizes intentionality as organizations settling on choices and undertaking exercises that are above what is lawfully required while the ISO definition (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) states that minor consistence is satisfactory. It is contended that just conforming to the law is better portrayed as great corporate administration and not of itself a demonstration of corporate social duty (Ashley and Crowther, 2012; Bênabou and Tirole, 2010). Integral to the CSR banter about is the thought of how society characterizes the part of business, and the subsequent duties. The exemplary parts and duties relegated to business are to outfit capital and different assets underway, to give work and important occupations, to lead research, advancement and development, to give products and enterprises to deal, to make riches for investors, representatives, clients and society on the loose. (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011) These center, development and benefit inspired obligations do address a few measurements of CSR, yet contrasting these with the duties supplied by CSR demonstrates the measure of progress important to move towards a socially capable plan of action. One extraordinary of the CSR face off regarding, regularly alluded to as the neo-established or conventional clash approach (Redman, 2005), contends that the main social obligation of business is to build benefits (Friedman, 1970). The opposite end of the range is the thing that Redman expressions the "genuine devotees" (2005, 78) way to deal with CSR. This is the place a firm has ecological and social duties set up that are not benefit propelled. In any case, genuine corporate unselfishness is uncommon with prove proposing that associations will probably receive an 'illuminated self-intrigue' way to deal with CSR (Porter and Kramer, 2006). This is an approach that binds socially mindful exercises to benefit making exercises (Redman, 2005). Illuminated self-intrigue has been one of the main impetuses behind corporate duty in connection to nature and use of panic assets. Contributions to creation, from crude items to petroleum derivatives, are getting to be alarm and organizations have expected to adjust to these progressions or hazard eradication (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). So while ecological effects are currently of more noteworthy worry to business, it could be contended this is more the survival of the business than a purposely socially dependable undertaking (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). In the meantime, society now holds more prominent desires of the business group (Scherer and Palazzo, 2011). With more elevated amounts of training (generally) and accordingly learning, there is to a lesser extent an inclination to trust the talk of business. Ashley and Crowther contend that clients are not searching for flawlessness of business rehearses, but rather "the do expect trustworthiness and straightforwardness" (2012, pg.3). The ascent and ascent of online networking has likewise made a quick and universal means for individuals to censure organizations for (saw) socially unreliable acts (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). The media likewise can give center and broad scope around organizations who have occupied with questionable practices (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). Organizations who utilize third world (regularly slave) work are being named and disgraced, and compelled to reassess their production network rehearses (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). In spite of these advances, the most recent decade has seen illustrations where self-direction and mindful corporate conduct have bombed stupendously (Lynch-Wood et al, 2009), causing such occasions as the Global Financial Crisis. Scarcely any, parts of society stay unaffected by these occasions. The reaction by approach creators and administrators has been quick and corrective. The net outcome being more prominent consistence and revealing necessities crosswise over most associations and enterprises. Presently there exists little qualification between what might have been viewed as a CSR association and one that practices great corporate administration (Money and Scheper, 2007; Mason and Simmonds, 2014). It is insincere to deny that the CSR development has not positively affected the business group. In any case, the staggering measure of advance in socially mindful activity has been started by the consumption of normal assets and the requirement for organizations to enhance tasks, changes in the public arena and societal desires of business and government authoritative reaction to corporate failings. Being socially mindful is currently simply great business, a basic segment of operational and vital basic leadership (Porter and Kramer, 2006). Whichever way it is has been accomplished, there are results that still exist for association that don't direct CSR. Both the recognition and reality of organization execution can be upgraded by receiving CSR. A few intellectuals contend the result is long haul, others contend that there is no result by any means (McWilliams et al, 2006). Above productivity, there are various dangers associations confront on the off chance that they don't take part in CSR conduct. It ought to be noticed that the accompanying isn't a comprehensive rundown, just the ones with the best potential effect. Reputational harm has dependably been a key result of socially untrustworthy business exercises (Walker and Dyck, 2014). Notoriety can be characterized as the total view of an associations inner and outside partners (Walker and Dyck, 2014) and speaks to an association's single most prominent immaterial resource. When notoriety is lost, or if nothing else affected altogether, it is hard to get back. Changes to the speed with which notoriety harming data can spread is additionally of worry to socially reckless associations as it is considerably more hard to stow away or deny wrong doing (Ashley and Crowther, 2012).Further to this, Walker and Dyck's (2014) examine demonstrated a positive connection between's an association's notoriety and those with corporate social obligation. Representative engagement and drawing in ability seems to run as an inseparable unit with socially capable corporate practices (Bhattacharya et al., 2008). The worldwide economy has been portrayed as a 'learning economy' (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011), with the best corporate resources living in the scholarly undertaking of staff. Bhattacharya et al. (2008) additionally contend that CSR is a route for a firm to demonstrate their qualities by and by and along these lines candidly captivating representatives to accomplish the greater part of the association's objectives. >GET ANSWER