When are behaviors associated with cognitive dissonance rational? When are they irrational? Describe some examples from your life experience that illustrate the nature of cognitive dissonance.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Cognitive dissonance refers to the mental discomfort we experience when holding conflicting beliefs, ideas, or behaviors. It’s a psychological tension that motivates us to reduce the inconsistency. Whether the behaviors we use to resolve this dissonance are “rational” or “irrational” depends on the specific context and how we define those terms.

Rational vs. Irrational Responses to Cognitive Dissonance

  • Rational Responses: These involve addressing the core inconsistency in a logical and realistic way. This might mean changing a belief, altering a behavior, or seeking new information that reconciles the conflict. The goal is to reduce dissonance while maintaining a coherent and accurate understanding of the situation.

Cognitive dissonance refers to the mental discomfort we experience when holding conflicting beliefs, ideas, or behaviors. It’s a psychological tension that motivates us to reduce the inconsistency. Whether the behaviors we use to resolve this dissonance are “rational” or “irrational” depends on the specific context and how we define those terms.

Rational vs. Irrational Responses to Cognitive Dissonance

  • Rational Responses: These involve addressing the core inconsistency in a logical and realistic way. This might mean changing a belief, altering a behavior, or seeking new information that reconciles the conflict. The goal is to reduce dissonance while maintaining a coherent and accurate understanding of the situation.
  • Irrational Responses: These often involve distorting reality, making excuses, or engaging in self-deception to reduce discomfort without actually resolving the underlying conflict. These responses prioritize feeling good over being accurate or consistent.

Examples from Life Experience

  1. The Smoker Who Knows Smoking is Bad:

    • The Dissonance: “I know smoking is harmful to my health, but I enjoy smoking and find it hard to quit.”
    • Rational Response: Acknowledge the health risks and make a genuine effort to quit smoking, perhaps with the help of cessation programs or nicotine replacement therapy.
    • Irrational Response: Downplay the health risks (“I only smoke a few cigarettes a day”), make excuses (“I’ll quit soon”), or engage in self-deception (“The research is exaggerated”).
  2. The Person Who Cheated on a Test:

    • The Dissonance: “I believe I’m an honest person, but I cheated on the test to get a good grade.”
    • Rational Response: Admit the mistake, accept the consequences, and learn from the experience. This might involve confessing to the teacher or seeking help to understand the material.
    • Irrational Response: Justify the cheating (“Everyone does it”), minimize the wrongdoing (“It was just one question”), or blame others (“The test was too hard”).
  3. The Employee Who Dislikes Their Boss:

    • The Dissonance: “I want to be a loyal and supportive employee, but I strongly dislike my boss and disagree with their decisions.”
    • Rational Response: Try to understand the boss’s perspective, communicate concerns constructively, or seek a transfer to a different team if the situation is untenable.
    • Irrational Response: Gossip about the boss behind their back, undermine their authority, or engage in passive-aggressive behavior.
  4. My Own Experience:

    • The Dissonance: “I value being environmentally conscious, but I often find myself taking shortcuts that are not eco-friendly (e.g., using disposable cups, driving instead of biking).”
    • Rational Response: I’ve been trying to increase my awareness of these inconsistencies and make gradual changes in my behavior. This includes bringing my own reusable containers, biking more often, and consciously reducing my consumption of single-use items.
    • Irrational Response (that I’ve sometimes been tempted to): Make excuses (“I’m too busy to be perfectly eco-friendly”), downplay the impact of my actions (“One person doesn’t make a difference”), or focus on the efforts I do make while ignoring the areas where I fall short.

Key Takeaways

  • Cognitive dissonance is a normal human experience. We all have conflicting thoughts and feelings at times.
  • The way we respond to cognitive dissonance can be either adaptive or maladaptive.
  • Rational responses lead to genuine resolution of the conflict and personal growth.
  • Irrational responses provide temporary relief but can ultimately lead to self-deception and a distorted view of reality.

Understanding cognitive dissonance can help us become more self-aware and make more conscious choices about how we respond to internal conflicts.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer