Design a program to address the issue/problem identified in your chosen project brief. (Still in same topic as the literature review)
The topic for the literature review was “BUILDING CULTURES OF RESPECT – SEXUAL HARASSMENT PREVENTION PROGRAM”
Your program design must include:
• A brief description of your proposed project (800 words)
• What the proposed project sets out to achieve
• How the proposed project or activity will achieve the desired outcome
• The groups that will be impacted by the program or activity
You must provide a program logic model that sets out the resources and activities that comprise the program and the changes that are expected to result from it.
Word Limit: 1750 words not including reference list and appendices
What does the project brief tell you?
– What is the problem or issue?
– Why is this a problem? (What causes the problem?)
– For whom (individual, household, group, community, society in
general) does this problem exist?
– Who has a stake in the problem? (Who cares whether it is resolved?)
What areas might you research to inform your program design?
• E.g. youth participation models, best practice in respectful
relationships education, community partnership models, digital
technologies and crime prevention
• Target population – barriers/facilitators to engagement
– What policy and legislative frameworks might you need to be aware of?
– What theoretical approaches are you aware of?
– What do you know about your organisation/sector? e.g. setting the scene
– What gaps are there in the research evidence?
Literature review: A critical summary and analysis of relevant literature
– More than just description – you have to critically analyse the existing
– Don’t just describe previous programs, evaluate their strengths & weaknesses
– The literature review should tell a story
– Identify themes/topics central to your research area
– Identify conflicting evidence
– Identify any gaps in the research literature
What did the researchers investigate?
– How was the research conducted?
– Who did they speak to?
– How many people did they speak to?
– What did they measure? e.g. program outcomes, attendance rates, behaviour change
– How did they measure it? e.g. validated scale, interviews, focus groups
– What were the findings & how do they differ from other studies?
– What were the limitations and weaknesses of the study?
The buyer base of this industry is bigger than some other industry and they have next to zero effect on the cost of the item. The purchaser dependably has awesome selection of brands inside the item class and they can move starting with one then onto the next without much impact. Subsequently, purchaser control isn't exactly solid in this industry. Be that as it may, they have control when they give risk to move starting with one brand then onto the next brand. In FMCG retailers ought to likewise considered for investigation. Retailers can simply choose which brand to stock and shoppers don't indicate much enthusiasm to pause in the event that one brand of decision isn't accessible. So retailers can simply settle on decision amongst brands and they have more purchaser control than buyers. Provider POWER: Provider control is pretty much nothing or restricted in the FMCG business. The business dependably has awesome number of providers with extraordinary size. There won't be any uniqueness in the item or administration of providers and the producer can simply move from one provider to other provider. However maker faces some measure of provider control because of the cost they need to cause when exchanging providers. Providers who do extensive business with producers are constantly obliged to their clients. Risk OF NEW ENTRANTS: Risk of new contestants is constrained in this industry. The new participants for the most part take into account nearby or little markets adding to the substantial chaotic segment. Crude materials for the vast majority of the sections in FMCG industry can be effectively obtained. The speculation won't be high for apparatus and different resources required for the vast majority of the items in the business. Additionally the fundamental innovation is effectively accessible. These components can make the nearby or little makes to enter effectively in the business. Be that as it may, this industry requires high introductory dispatch cost and appropriation organize is dependably a test. These variables go about as an obstruction for any new participants in the business and for all intents and purposes give low risk of new contestants. Danger OF SUBSTITUTES: The FMCG business bears a high danger of substitutes. The business has numerous composed players with incredible number of nearby produces. The items in the business can simply be imitated and showcased. The business has abnormal state risk of substitutes in country advertise than in the urban. Level OF RIVALRY: The level of competition is high in the business. There are numerous worldwide players alongside neighborhood makers. The business appreciates low client dependability. The clients dependably have wide selection of brands and the exchanging cost is constantly least or irrelevant. There will be just slight distinction in the nature of brands. So the opposition is wild in the business to draw in clients and hold them. Vital gatherings in the business: Among the FMCG organizations in India Hindustan Unilever Limited is most provided food organization to relatively every portion in the business. Its rivals are just taken into account certain sections however HUL faces firm rivalry from all rivals in each portion. The significant organizations of vital gatherings in FMCG industry are Hindustan Unilever Limited, ITC Limited, Nestle India, Emami Limited, Colgate-Palmolive (India) Limited, Dabur India Limited, Procter and Gamble, Godrej Consumer Products Limited and Cadbury India. Worldwide Competition: India is a developing business sector and has turned into a hotspot for some multinational FMCG organizations like HUL, Proctor and Gamble and Nestle. However household organizations like Marico, Dabur and Emami are giving extreme rivalry to them. These organizations advance into normal item classification by offering natural items and figured out how to possess the market. For example, Marico's leader image Parachute Coconut Oil has no outside rivalry. The nearness of universal rivalry is limited to zones of where they can act and classes like normal items did not premium the worldwide players. Industry Threats: The sorted out players in the business are confronting issues high extent of imitative items. The phony items are seen exceptionally in rustic markets and the Indian FMCG area is losing expansive measure of cash because of quality of fakes items. The business is confronting expanding input costs because of increment in cost of the crude materials because of worldwide financial stoppage and potential effect of rising raw petroleum costs Industry Opportunities: The FMCG area is the fourth-biggest division in the Indian economy and has been becoming extensively finished the previous couple of years because of evolving way of life, purchaser inclinations and high discretionary cashflow. The provincial market is as a rule very undiscovered and gives ideal condition to development of the organizations in this area. Assessing HUL STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESS: VRIO Framework of Hindustan Unilever Limited: The estimation of HUL lies in their capacity to offer diverse items and take into account the distinctive portions in the business. The association has global skill and abundance of information to take into account distinctive portions fulfilling the client needs. The association is showing elevated requirements of corporate conduct towards its partners. The organization understands that its workers are the essential wellspring of accomplishment and very much dedicated to their representatives. The association energizes the open correspondence with clients to get criticism and enhance its item offerings. Irregularity: The organization appreciates the upper hand in its hearty production network and conveyance arrange. Despite the fact that the organization assets are not uncommon it appreciates the upper hand in its assets utilized in production network and dispersion arrange. Imitability: The association has profitable and uncommon assets in its production network and appropriation arrange that the contenders did not have taken a toll advantage in mimicking the asset. The social connections involved in assets are unpredictable that the contenders can't without much of a stretch mirror and oversee well. Association: The association structure of HUL with its engaged chiefs over the organization's across the nation activities gives speed and adaptability in basic leadership and execution. The association use its assets for effective administration. The organization understands that its workers are the essential wellspring of progress and all around focused on their representatives. Examination of Corporate Strategies: Hindustan Unilever Limited has hearty store network and appropriation organize covering more than 3400 wholesalers and 16 million outlets. HUL's business association structure incorporates the Household, Personal Care and sustenances dispersion arranges together. By this the association adjusts every one of the units of its association towards the shared objective. Examination of Business Strategies: HUL presents wide assortment of items in various sections at various value focuses. HUL investigations its procedure to enhance its toehold in the handled nourishments classification which is to a great extent empty. HUL Strengths: The organization has assortment of items in every class giving wide cluster of decision to clients. Hearty Distribution Network covering more than 3400 wholesalers and 16 million outlets. The Company appreciates numerous rumored marks and made an all around presumed mark picture in the clients mind through commercial. Very much created quality administration. The organization has exceptionally able and very much created R&D assets. HUL Weakness HUL not ready to contend successfully with nearby rival in the provincial market: The Company's item for the most part target working class and lower white collar class populace. So the upper white collar class populace terms the organization's item as a shoddy item with low quality HUL is over subject to Indian market and relies upon it for greater part of income age. This rolls out the organization subject to improvements in climate, political and financial conditions and furthermore makes it defenseless against potential dangers emerging in India.>GET ANSWER