As discussed in Chapter 5 of our text and in the video Building Literacy Competencies in Early Childhood (Links to an external site.), exposure to stories, poetry, nursery rhymes, and songs encourages literacy development (Coats, 2013). Identify a piece of poetry, a nursery rhyme, or a song that can be used to encourage literacy development. Describe three different ways you would use this piece to help build phonological awareness. In addition, be sure to discuss how building these phonological awareness skills will promote literacy development.
Guided Response: Review and respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Imagine you are a school principal or center director who has just observed an instructor teaching a lesson using one of the ideas your classmates mentioned for developing phonological awareness. As you observed the lesson, you noticed that some students appeared to easily master the concept while others were struggling. Share an idea for how teachers can help a student who is struggling with phonological awareness. Also, share an idea as to how teachers can enrich phonological awareness for a student who already has the concept mastered.
pproach towards clinical negligence instances, in that it has enabled the courts to scrutinise the reasonableness of professional scientific opinion. Bolam the full force of Bolam consequently seems to have no less than been reduced. this will be discovered in instances inclusive of R (Smeaton) v Secretary of country for health, wherein the courtroom performed an in-intensity exam of the regulation on abortion. The courtroom scrutinised each educational and scientific opinion, which suggests the growth willingness of the courts to emerge as acquainted with medical troubles to be able to judge the equity of the regulation in such regions. but, such instances are few and a ways among. Conclusions it is able to be concluded that Bolitho in principle appears to have a big impact at the regulation on scientific negligence, in that it allows the courts to decide the reasonableness of medical opinion. In theory, however, the courts have verified eager to hold their non-interventionist technique toward medical experts. The choice has at the least enabled the courts to judge and disregard unreasonable or illogical medical opinion. which means that scientific experts are subject to a barely better fashionable of care, as now not any body of clinical opinion might be familiar by way of the courts. This marks a excellent shift from the huge ambit of discretion granted to medical professionals below Bolam. Bolitho has shifted the focal point of the courts from paternalism toward criminal certainty. The courts are now capable of query medical opinion, and decide it according to the usual of reasonableness. it's also vital to point out that the adoption of a very strict approach closer to scientific experts might certainly have negative outcomes as a result of protective medication. The coverage motives underlying the courts' method towards medical negligence instances ought to not consequently be left out. The most tremendous effect that Bolitho has had is that it has restored 'the Bolam test to its proper limits and suitable context'. medical specialists can now not be deemed absolutely immune from liability, indicating that Bolitho has impacted upon the regulation. The courts following Bolitho have come to be greater aware of the necessities that clinical opinion should fulfill a good way to be relied upon. This has rendered them extra inclined to query and scrutinise scientific opinion, which means that the medical profession now not controls the same old of care anticipated of medical specialists. standard, then, Bolitho has had an essential impact at the Bolam take a look at, in that it has placed it inside appropriate boundaries, thereby reinforcing the rights of sufferers in clinical negligence instances.>GET ANSWER