You are an employee who overhears conversations among your coworkers. While on break, two male coworkers, Robert and Henry, usually go outside by themselves to talk and smoke a cigarette. Robert is African-American and Henry is Hispanic. One day, Shirley is also outside and overhears bits and pieces of their conversation. Shirley, who is a white woman, is concerned that they regularly have conversations that are inappropriate for the workplace. She says that she overheard these coworkers making crude sexual references about women, sharing images and graphics of a sexist nature on their cell phones.
The matter is brought to the attention of their supervisor, Allen, who is white and male. Allen is also gay. Allen tells Robert and Henry that he is concerned about potential gender bias in the workplace that makes gender and sexual minorities feel unsafe.
Robert makes a comment to Allen that their conversation was private and that Shirley was not invited into the conversation. He further states that white women are always inserting themselves into other people’s business. He feels that he and Henry are being called out on their behavior because they hold lower paid jobs in the organization.
Shirley replies that as one of the few females in the organization, she is often made to feel unsafe in her work environment and that as the only woman involved in this meeting, she feels as though no one is listening to her point of view.
You have been hired as a consultant to this company and have been asked advice on how to handle the situation.
You will need to incorporate a discussion of intersectionality into your response. Refer to Chapter 14.3 Workplace Identities, Interactions, and Inequalities to inform your response.
In a 500-word (minimum) essay using the concepts that you learned from this week’s readings, analyze the different ways that sexist behavior is handled in the formal and informal bureaucracy. Address the following items in your essay.
- What are the power dynamics in this situation related to the statuses of racial, gender, and sexual identities?
- How is each person’s point of view valid?
- What would you propose as a resolution?
misguided judgments on 'circle sub-learning territory' in elementary school science course schedule. They considered 582 fifth grade understudies comprised of 298 female and 284male understudies concentrating elementary schools situated in Ankara. In this examination, accomplishment test created by reseracher was applied to 582 fifth grade understudies and it was broke down the misinterpretations in circle sub-learning region with definitional inquire about. As per discoveries in this investigation, it can say that understudies have most misinterpretations on span and least confusions on focus ideas on circle sub-learning zone. Likewise, it expressed that female understudies have fallen into mistake not exactly male understudies in circle idea. Moreover, number of read books effectsly affect idea implication and expanding accomplishment on science builds the meanings of ideas. Erol (2008) led an investigation called as 'Exploration of eighth Grade Students Mathematical Skills Related to Circle Subject' which means to look at the eighth grade elementary school understudies scientific abilities identified with hover subject in geometry.She examined 196 understudies included eighth grade understudies chose from three open and one tuition based school situated in Ankara.In this examination, critical thinking aptitudes identified with hover subject in geometry of understudies in state schools and non-public schools have been analyzed. In this investigation, two tests have been built up; the first was a different decision 'Information test' to assess the understudies' information about circle point, and the other test was 'Execution Test' to assess their critical thinking abilities. As indicated by discoveries, when the consequences of information test analyzed, there was no huge distinction among female and male understudies as far as theoretical, procedural and critical thinking aptitudes. Be that as it may, when the aftereffect of execution test analyzed, female understudies were more succesful than male students.Also, it was reasoned that the visual and applied aptitudes of understudies were superior to their operational abilities. The understudies were finished up to tend more to tackle issues by drawing and relying upon visuality and hence to be progressively effective. What's more, understudies concentrating in tuition based school were more succesful than understudies concentrating in state funded schools.>GET ANSWER