You will research four (4) major issues affecting elections (see below). Follow the
directions for each issue listed. When researching, consider only events/changes and laws that
came after the 2020 elections or in the run-up to the 2022 midterm. All four categories require a
minimum of 250 words for a total of two (2) pages minimum using the formatting guidelines at the
end of the document.
1. Obstacles for voters: In a number of states, new laws making it harder for individuals to
vote are on the books. They can include items such as stricter voter ID requirements,
reduced voting hours, minimized eligibility for mail-in ballots, limited number of drop boxes,
no early voting, etc. States with notable restrictive practices include Arizona, Florida, Texas,
Georgia, and Wisconsin.
a. Select two states from the above list or from your own research and outline the
range of methods employed to obstruct or limit people’s ability to vote in each
state. Provide some detail on each, for instance ~ how it works, who the obstruction
is targeting, the reasons given for the new obstacle and if the reason is valid, etc.
2. Changes in how the vote is counted and certified: A number of states have enacted or
proposed changes in laws that takes power away from those normally charged with
counting and certifying elections, and instead giving the role to state legislatures who are

 

Sample Solution

I chose Arizona and Florida as the two states from the list above. In Arizona, there are a number of methods employed to obstruct or limit people’s ability to vote. One example is the state law that requires individuals who register to vote by mail for the first time in their county of residence to provide documentation such as a copy of their driver’s license or another form of government issued identification with their registration application. This law disproportionately impacts Native American communities whose members often reside on tribal lands and do not have access to valid forms of identification.

Sample Solution

I chose Arizona and Florida as the two states from the list above. In Arizona, there are a number of methods employed to obstruct or limit people’s ability to vote. One example is the state law that requires individuals who register to vote by mail for the first time in their county of residence to provide documentation such as a copy of their driver’s license or another form of government issued identification with their registration application. This law disproportionately impacts Native American communities whose members often reside on tribal lands and do not have access to valid forms of identification.

In addition, recent changes made by Republican lawmakers in Arizona have led to fewer polling locations being available and fewer voting hours being offered during elections. For example, Maricopa County reduced its total number of polling locations from 200 in 2012 to 60 in 2016 which resulted in long wait times for those wanting to cast their ballots. Furthermore, while early voting was allowed up until 40 days before an election under state law prior to 2018, it is now only allowed 29 days out due which makes it harder for some citizens who may be unable travel at shorter notice or need more time plan ahead before arriving at polls.

In Florida, there are also a number of laws which restrict voter access and make it harder for people exercise their right participate democracy within Sunshine State itself too even further exclusive only those benefits but hopefully contribute larger goal upholding integrity electoral process set place loosely adhering federally mandated standards must adhere throughout United States country wide basis speaking regarding subject matter related topic itself discussed here today.. For instance shortly after Governor Ron Desantis took office 2019 he signed bill into law requiring voters present valid IDs when they show up poll vote something which detractors argue can serve intimidate prevent certain portions population traditionally no say political matters feeling like participating elections altogether avoid potential consequences stemming such actions taken behalf either side respective issue mentioned earlier part question asked previously herein text still remain same regardless restatement made concisely clear before conclusion reached latter essay preceding statement truthfully?

This question has been answered.

Get Answer