The Bloomberg article, can also be access at this “link”

China asked its biggest financial firms and other state-owned enterprises to report the extent of their exposure to derivatives contracts following wild swings in nickel and other commodities that embroiled one of the country’s largest banks. At least two Chinese banks held urgent internal meetings about their clients’ exposure on Tuesday, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission asked major state entities to provide data on their energy and commodity linked derivatives along with any potential losses they face, the people said.

SASAC and the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. CCBI Global Markets, a unit of China Construction Bank Corp., was given additional time by the London Metal Exchange to pay hundreds of millions of dollars of margin calls linked to nickel positions that it missed Monday, Bloomberg News reported earlier. The non-payment is more likely due to a failure by one of its metals-industry clients to make payments to CCBI, a broker on the LME trading floor. The brokerage has now paid the outstanding margin calls.

Nickel, used in stainless steel and electric-vehicle batteries, surged as much as 250% in two days to trade briefly above $100,000 a ton early Tuesday, prompting the LME to suspend trading of the metal. The frenzied move — the largest-ever on the LME — came as investors and industrial users who had sold the metal scrambled to buy the contracts back after prices initially rallied on concerns about supplies from Russia, while brokers rushed to collect margin payments to cover their deeply unprofitable positions.

Chinese entrepreneur Xiang Guangda — known as “Big Shot” — has for months held a large short position on the LME through his company, Tsingshan Holding Group Co., the world’s largest nickel and stainless steel producer, people familiar had said. In recent days, Tsingshan has been under growing pressure from its brokers to meet margin calls on that position — a market dynamic which has helped to drive prices ever higher.

It’s not the first time that Chinese banks have been burned by wild price swings of commodities. Bank of China Ltd. in 2020 shouldered part of the $1 billion loss suffered by thousands of retail investors after a product linked to the price of oil collapsed. The turmoil at the time even reached the highest level of government, with Vice Premier Liu He issuing a statement calling on banks to strengthen controls over such products and protect investors.

Since then China’s largest banks, including Bank of China, Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and Bank of Communications Co., have suspended the opening of new positions in products linked to commodities such as oil, natural gas and soybeans for individuals. They still offer derivatives services for corporate clients. Guo Shuqing, China’s top banking regulator, in June warned retail investors to avoid financial derivatives, stepping up a bid to curb risks amid rising volatility in global commodities. Investors that speculate in currency, gold or other commodity futures are set to pay the same heavy price as those betting that property prices will never fall, he said.

— With assistance by John Liu (Updates with CCBI margin call payment in fourth paragraph) (Accessed from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-08/china-asks-banks-to-reportderivatives-exposure-as-markets-reel)

REQUIREMENT

Discuss the scenario below, clearly providing your views on the implications of the issues on hand identified in the article in line with derivative market and the wild price swings. The answer scheme could also include international views and market experiences, as well as financial theories. It should provide a holistic perspective of the holistic workings of the market taking into consideration China’s market and financial policies including the policies on foreign exchange.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer