Consider the clinical partnerships that result within the CC/IC delivery model. Integrating concepts developed from different content domains in psychology, address the following questions.
How might health care teams achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients?
How does this support health literacy?
What factors might lead to the failure of the CC/IC delivery model?
How might lack of acceptance of the value or viability of the CC/IC model by stakeholders, lack of awareness of the clinical competencies of various members of the team, barriers to financial reimbursement for services, and lack of integration of support services within the practice cause a breakdown in efficacy?
What supportive interventions within the CC/IC model address such issues?
In addition, consider how successful health care models assume an understanding of each profession’s competencies and responsibilities. For example, primary care providers (PCPs) are sometimes unaware of the abilities and practice scope of psychology
professionals.
Identify methods of targeted intervention and education for PCPs that might alleviate potential issues for the CC/IC model.
Explain how the APA Ethical Code of Conduct can be used to guide decisions in these complex situations.
Evaluate and comment on the potential work settings where you might find the CC/IC model. In what ways might this model provide more job satisfaction?
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Clinical Partnerships and the CC/IC Delivery Model: Achieving Therapeutic Goals, Supporting Health Literacy, and Addressing Potential Challenges
The CC/IC (Collaborative Care/Integrated Care) delivery model is a collaborative approach to healthcare that involves the integration of different healthcare professionals from various disciplines to provide comprehensive and coordinated care to individual clients. This model fosters clinical partnerships between healthcare teams, with the aim of achieving therapeutic goals for clients, supporting health literacy, and addressing potential challenges. In this essay, we will explore how healthcare teams can achieve therapeutic goals, support health literacy, address potential challenges within the CC/IC model, and provide targeted intervention and education for primary care providers (PCPs). Additionally, we will discuss the role of the APA Ethical Code of Conduct in guiding decisions in complex situations and examine potential work settings where the CC/IC model can be implemented.
Achieving Therapeutic Goals for Individual Clients
Healthcare teams within the CC/IC delivery model can achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients through a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach. By integrating the expertise of professionals from different domains such as psychology, medicine, nursing, and social work, the team can address various aspects of a client’s health and well-being. For example, psychologists can provide evidence-based therapies for mental health conditions, while medical professionals can prescribe appropriate medications. This holistic approach allows for a comprehensive assessment and treatment plan tailored to the individual’s needs, leading to improved therapeutic outcomes.
Supporting Health Literacy
The CC/IC delivery model plays a crucial role in supporting health literacy among clients. Health literacy refers to an individual’s ability to obtain, process, and understand health information to make informed decisions about their health. By involving professionals from different disciplines in the care team, clients are exposed to a diverse range of expertise and knowledge. This multidisciplinary approach ensures that clients receive clear and accessible information about their health conditions, treatment options, and self-management strategies. Through effective communication and education, healthcare teams can empower clients to actively participate in their own care and make informed decisions regarding their health.
Factors Leading to Failure of the CC/IC Delivery Model
While the CC/IC delivery model has numerous benefits, several factors can lead to its failure. One significant challenge is the lack of acceptance or understanding of the value and viability of this model by stakeholders. Resistance from healthcare professionals or organizations may hinder the implementation and integration of collaborative care practices. Additionally, a lack of awareness regarding the clinical competencies and responsibilities of various team members can impede effective collaboration. This can result in a breakdown in communication, coordination, and ultimately, efficacy of the CC/IC model. Moreover, barriers to financial reimbursement for services provided by different team members can affect sustainability and hinder the successful implementation of the model. Lastly, a lack of integration of support services within the practice can limit access to necessary resources for clients.
Supportive Interventions within the CC/IC Model
To address potential challenges within the CC/IC model, several supportive interventions can be implemented. These include promoting awareness and education among stakeholders about the benefits and evidence supporting collaborative care. Building relationships based on trust and respect between team members is essential for effective communication and collaboration. Developing clear roles and responsibilities for each team member enhances efficiency and prevents confusion. Additionally, advocating for policy changes that improve financial reimbursement for services provided by all team members can help overcome financial barriers. Integrating support services such as case management or care coordination within the practice ensures that clients have access to comprehensive care.
Targeted Intervention and Education for PCPs
To address potential issues between primary care providers (PCPs) and psychology professionals within the CC/IC model, targeted intervention and education is crucial. PCPs may have limited awareness of the abilities and practice scope of psychology professionals. Therefore, it is important to implement educational initiatives that provide PCPs with a better understanding of psychology professionals’ competencies and responsibilities. This can include workshops, seminars, or shadowing experiences where PCPs have opportunities to observe psychology professionals in action. By fostering collaboration and enhancing knowledge-sharing between PCPs and psychology professionals, the CC/IC model can be effectively implemented.
APA Ethical Code of Conduct in Guiding Decisions
The American Psychological Association (APA) Ethical Code of Conduct serves as a valuable guide in complex situations within the CC/IC model. It provides ethical principles and standards that psychology professionals should adhere to when making decisions. For instance, when collaborating with other healthcare professionals, psychologists must ensure that there is clear communication regarding their scope of practice, maintaining confidentiality, and obtaining informed consent from clients. The APA Ethical Code of Conduct also emphasizes the importance of respecting cultural diversity, avoiding conflicts of interest, and providing competent care. By adhering to these ethical guidelines, healthcare teams within the CC/IC model can navigate complex situations while upholding professional standards.
Work Settings for the CC/IC Model
The CC/IC model can be implemented in various work settings across healthcare systems. It is commonly found in primary care clinics or community health centers where individuals receive comprehensive healthcare services. The integration of different healthcare professionals within these settings allows for improved coordination and communication between providers, resulting in better patient outcomes. Additionally, the CC/IC model can also be implemented in specialty clinics such as mental health centers or chronic disease management programs. By incorporating psychology professionals alongside medical practitioners in these settings, clients receive holistic care that addresses both physical and mental health needs.
Job satisfaction within the CC/IC model can be enhanced in several ways. Firstly, healthcare professionals benefit from working collaboratively with colleagues from different disciplines, allowing for shared expertise and learning opportunities. The model also promotes a sense of shared responsibility for patient care, fostering a supportive work environment. Furthermore, by providing comprehensive and coordinated care through this model, healthcare professionals witness improved patient outcomes and greater patient satisfaction. This positive impact on patients’ lives can contribute to increased job satisfaction among healthcare providers.
In conclusion, the CC/IC delivery model promotes clinical partnerships among healthcare teams to achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients while supporting health literacy. However, challenges such as lack of acceptance by stakeholders or awareness of clinical competencies may arise. Supportive interventions such as education initiatives or policy changes can address these challenges. Targeted intervention and education for PCPs are important to foster collaboration between different professions within the CC/IC model. The APA Ethical Code of Conduct guides decisions in complex situations by emphasizing ethical principles and standards. The model can be implemented in various work settings where it provides more job satisfaction through collaboration, improved patient outcomes, and holistic care provision.
