Analyzes two areas of critical importance for collaboration between HR and managers when making staffing decisions.
Recommends a process and elements for creating effective job descriptions.
Explains two prominent considerations for developing fair and competitive compensation and benefit plans.
Justifies your recommendation for an appropriate employee performance appraisal methodology
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Collaboration between HR and Managers in Staffing Decisions
Collaboration between HR and managers is essential for effective staffing decisions. Two areas of critical importance for collaboration in this process are:
Job Analysis: HR and managers need to collaborate closely to conduct a thorough job analysis. This involves identifying the key responsibilities, required skills, qualifications, and competencies for a particular role. HR can provide expertise in job analysis techniques, such as conducting interviews and observing job performance, while managers contribute their firsthand knowledge of the role’s requirements and expectations.
Candidate Selection: HR and managers should collaborate closely during the candidate selection process. HR can help design and implement effective recruitment strategies, screen applications, and conduct initial interviews to identify qualified candidates. Managers then play a crucial role in assessing the candidates’ fit with the team and organization, conducting in-depth interviews, and making the final hiring decisions. This collaborative approach ensures that both HR and managers have input in selecting the best candidate for the role.
Creating Effective Job Descriptions
Creating effective job descriptions is essential for attracting qualified candidates and ensuring clarity in job expectations. The following process and elements are recommended for creating effective job descriptions:
Process:
Collaboration: HR should collaborate with managers to gather information about the role’s responsibilities, required skills, and qualifications.
Job Analysis: Conduct a thorough job analysis to identify the key components of the role.
Clarity and Accuracy: Clearly define the job title, reporting relationships, primary responsibilities, and required qualifications.
Review and Approval: Ensure that the job description is reviewed and approved by both HR and the relevant manager before being finalized.
Elements:
Job Title: Use a clear and descriptive job title that accurately reflects the role’s responsibilities.
Summary: Provide a brief overview of the role’s purpose and primary responsibilities.
Duties and Responsibilities: Clearly outline the specific tasks, duties, and responsibilities associated with the role.
Qualifications: Specify the required education, experience, certifications, and skills necessary to perform the job effectively.
Reporting Relationships: Indicate who the employee will report to and any direct reports they may have.
Developing Fair and Competitive Compensation and Benefit Plans
Developing fair and competitive compensation and benefit plans is crucial for attracting and retaining talented employees. Two prominent considerations in this process are:
Market Research: Conducting thorough market research is essential to ensure that compensation packages are competitive within the industry and region. HR should collaborate with managers to gather market data on salary ranges, benefits packages, and other incentives offered by similar organizations. This information enables organizations to benchmark their compensation plans against industry standards and remain competitive in attracting top talent.
Internal Equity: While external market data is important, organizations also need to consider internal equity when developing compensation plans. Internal equity ensures that employees are fairly compensated relative to their colleagues within the organization. HR and managers should collaborate to establish clear salary ranges based on factors such as job responsibilities, performance levels, and tenure. This collaboration ensures that compensation decisions are consistent, transparent, and equitable across the organization.
Recommendation for Employee Performance Appraisal Methodology
One appropriate employee performance appraisal methodology is a combination of self-assessment and 360-degree feedback. This methodology justifies its recommendation based on several reasons:
Holistic Evaluation: The self-assessment component allows employees to reflect on their own performance, strengths, weaknesses, and goals. It promotes self-awareness and encourages employees to take ownership of their professional development.
Multi-perspective Feedback: The 360-degree feedback component provides a comprehensive view of an employee’s performance by collecting feedback from various sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and even external stakeholders. This multi-perspective feedback helps identify blind spots, uncover areas for improvement, and recognize strengths that may not be apparent from a single perspective.
Developmental Focus: The combination of self-assessment and 360-degree feedback creates a developmental focus in performance appraisals. It encourages open communication between employees and their supervisors, fosters a growth mindset, and promotes ongoing conversations about performance improvement.
Fairness and Objectivity: The inclusion of multiple perspectives in the evaluation process enhances fairness and objectivity by reducing biases or subjective judgments that may arise from relying solely on a supervisor’s assessment.
Employee Engagement: Involving employees in their own performance evaluation through self-assessment fosters a sense of ownership and engagement. It promotes a culture of continuous improvement where employees actively participate in their professional growth.
In conclusion, collaboration between HR and managers is critical in staffing decisions. Effective job descriptions require collaboration between HR and managers during the job analysis process. Developing fair compensation plans involves market research and consideration of internal equity. A recommended employee performance appraisal methodology combines self-assessment and 360-degree feedback to provide holistic evaluation, multi-perspective feedback, developmental focus, fairness, objectivity, and employee engagement.
