After reading the Collusion in Major League Baseball Case from our textbook, respond to the following prompts in one to four sentences:

Based on the information in the case (and as of the case’s date, 1988-1990)

According to the case’s description, during the following periods did collusion exist between MLB owners and, if so, was it tacit or explicit (briefly describe why)?
In the offseason preceding the 1985 season
In the offseason preceding the 1986 season
In the offseason preceding the 1987 season
In the offseason preceding the 1988 season
Why might Major League Baseball be at risk if there is not explicit collusion, but there is tacit collusion (i.e. not communicated between owners, nor through the commissioner’s office)?
Which industry attributes affected the likelihood of successful collusion in Major League Baseball (see Table 7.6) and how so?
Additional information: Between 1984 and 1988, there were 26 MLB teams. New teams could not be added without approval of existing teams’ owners, andMajor League Baseball had limited ability to prevent other parties in its supply chain from working with other leagues (in baseball or in other sports)
How are the ethical implications of collusion in Major League Baseball similar and/or dissimilar from other examples of collusion (specific as given by the textbook, or in general as described by the textbook)?

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Title: Collusion in Major League Baseball: An Analysis of Ethical Implications

Introduction

Collusion in Major League Baseball during the late 1980s involved covert agreements among team owners to suppress player salaries, leading to a significant ethical dilemma within the sport.

Thesis Statement

The collusion in Major League Baseball during the specified periods was primarily tacit in nature, posing substantial risks to the integrity of the game and raising ethical concerns within the industry.

Collusion Existence and Nature

1. In the offseason preceding the 1985, 1986, 1987, and 1988 seasons, collusion between MLB owners existed, primarily through tacit agreements.
2. The tacit collusion, not overtly communicated but implied through owners’ actions, posed risks as it hindered players’ rights to fair compensation and distorted market dynamics within the league.

Risks of Tacit Collusion

1. Major League Baseball faces significant risks with tacit collusion as it undermines free market principles and fairness in player contracts.
2. Without explicit communication or oversight by the commissioner’s office, tacit collusion can breed mistrust among stakeholders and damage the league’s reputation.

Industry Attributes and Collusion Likelihood

1. Industry attributes such as a limited number of teams and lack of regulatory mechanisms contributed to the success of collusion in Major League Baseball.
2. The absence of competitive pressures and barriers to entry made it easier for owners to engage in collusive practices without facing significant repercussions.

Ethical Implications of Collusion

1. The ethical implications of collusion in Major League Baseball are akin to other industries where anti-competitive behavior distorts market dynamics and harms stakeholders.
2. While collusion may serve owners’ interests in the short term, it undermines the core values of fairness and competition that define professional sports.

Conclusion

The case of collusion in Major League Baseball sheds light on the ethical challenges posed by tacit agreements among owners, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in preserving the integrity of the sport. Addressing these issues is crucial to ensuring a level playing field for players and upholding the principles of fairness and competition in professional sports.

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer