1. Watch the video about euphemistic language and answer the questions. Video: Euphemisms and Connotation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-B3cFB3FPc Write a response to the video in which you share your own observations about how businesses and government officials sometimes use euphemistic language to hide the truth and to manipulate their customers and constituents.
What is euphemistic language?
How is euphemistic language used to manipulate people and to hide or soften the truth?
2. Read the email and then answer the questions below.
Email: To: All employees
From: Lisa Dawn
Subject: September 1 kickoff
September 1st will again mark the start of Hunger Action Month. Each year, the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank recognizes Hunger Action Month by holding a one-month long food drive competition among local area businesses. This year on September 1st we will once again mark the beginning of Hunger Action Month at our company. Last year’s competition brought in over 20,000 pounds of food!!!!!! That roughly equals 26,000 meals for families in Central PA! Thank you for your participation and commitment to end hunger in our community!!!!!!!
Penn National Insurance will once again participate in the Corporate Food Challenge August 30 through September 24. Last year, we brought in 1,798 pounds of food! Our goal for this year is 2,500 pounds! You can help change the lives of many families in our community who are having difficulty putting food on the table during these tough economic times.
Bins will be placed in the lobby, and once again we will have competitions each week to see which department will bring in the heaviest amount of food.
1. Provide a general critique of this email.
2. What is the writer’s objective?
3. Has the writer achieved her objective?
4. If not, what would you change to help the document achieve the writer’s objective?
5. Imagine that you received this email over the weekend, and did not see it until first thing Monday morning, in a crowded email inbox filled with dozens of emails. What key element is missing from this email that could result in recipients not bothering to open and read it?
3. Answer the following questions:
• How can I apologize effectively?
• How can I apologize in a way that is truthful, genuine and likely to restore my relationship with those whom I am apologizing to?
4. Discuss and analyze a situation where you worked on a project team consisting of diverse or intercultural team members. Briefly describe the team and answer the following questions.
• What were some good and/or poor examples of communication?
• Discuss any examples or interpretation of cultural differences as described in Hoftstede’s Cultural Values chart on p. 46 of your text (i.e. individualism, time orientation, formality, etc.).
• Is there anything that could have been done to make the communication more effective?
5. Review and analyze a recent example of communication you received at your workplace. Discuss whether you felt the sender used an appropriate channel of communication and why.
o Identify the components of communication (stimulus, filter, message, medium and destination)
o Discuss any examples of “noise” and verbal or non-verbal barriers
Live Interpretation of Heritage Distributed: first August, 2018 Last Edited: first August, 2018 Disclaimer: This article has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert exposition essayists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any assessments, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Memorable Sites, Museums and Galleries Live understanding of Heritage Presentation In the course of recent decades legacy and culture has turned into a vital piece of individuals' life, particularly in regard of their recreation and vacationer exercises (Boyd 2003, p.1). This is especially valid on account of tourism, where the verifiable interest for traveler and relaxation exercises have wound down for those loaded with more social components. There is an expanding want to visit noteworthy locales, exhibition halls and displays in an endeavor by the person to take in more about their legacy and those of different societies and social gatherings. In the meantime, the present legacy guest has turned out to be all the more perceiving about the way that these settings display legacy experience to them (Boyd 2003, p.2). Generally in this way, legacy can be believed to identify with chronicled occasions and settings and the guest needs to encounter those recorded encounters as a relatively physical occasion. Nonetheless, notwithstanding the various explores and overview comes about that backings this adjustment in the guest request, there is still confirmation that various legacy locales, exhibition halls and displays are neglecting to respond emphatically to these discoveries (Black 2005, p.10), which as a rule has brought about a drop in guest numbers at these settings. This circumstance can have genuine results, particularly for those legacy destinations that depend upon extra charges to cross over any barrier between state subsidizing and the running expenses of the setting. Indeed, even where this not the situation, for instance where government subsidizing is utilized to give free affirmation, such settings are as yet responsible to the state and need to demonstrate that their foundation is conveying to the requirements of people in general, which a decrease in guest numbers won't accomplish. With an end goal to address this issue the most recent two decades have seen an expansion in writing related particularly to the way in which legacy is shown and depicted to the guest, making another train under the general title of legacy understanding. Legacy translation relates similarly to the comprehension of the site or questions showed for the guest and the inspiration determinant and requirements of that guest (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.1). Up to this point, most scholastics concur that legacy translation has been the slightest created part of the setting's advancement to the guest (Boyd 2003 and Blockley and Hems 2006). Understanding structures and fundamental piece of the guest encounter and will impact the experience that they detract from the visit (Boyd 2003, p.193). Along these lines, it takes after that understanding what spurs a guest or gathering of guests will empower the historical center, exhibition or legacy site to be better ready to show and advance their item (on the same page 2003, p.64). For most guests that inspiration will be to pick up delight and gaining from the question or movement being shown. Much of the time, as Blockley and Hems (2006, p.10) propose in their exploration the inspiration for the visit is to satisfy the person's requirement for joy and inclining and if the legacy scene or question does not accomplish this the guest will leave disappointed. Truth be told, the guest has generally expected to be welcomed with visual perspectives, and energized shows when going to legacy locales (Dicks 2003, p.17). In this way it is basic for the setting directors to guarantee their goal and its substance meet these necessities. One part of understanding that has gone to the fore in the psyches of the guest amid late years, and a zone that scholastics concur is a basic piece of elucidation, is the level of communication that exists between the guest and the legacy setting or protest. An ongoing improvement in this regard is the expanding utilization of different types of live understanding inside the legacy show and other setting exercises, and it this region of translation that will frame the point of convergence for this investigation. Live Interpretation Live translation of legacy is the most direct type of cooperation between the guest and the antiques and occasions that are being displayed at legacy locales and scenes. Guests and visitors today hope to see live legacy and social shows instead of lifeless things showed in vacant or one dimensional building and show boxes. For instance, guests to mechanical exhibition halls have generally expected to be dealt with to visual and moving showcases of authentic apparatus and even to feel the experience through a living case of the general public of the time (Dicks 2003, p.29). The procedure of live elucidation can be conveyed in various configurations. One early case of live elucidation was accomplished by enabling the guest to cooperate with working models, which empowered them to all the more likely translate the procedures that were included with that models operational reason. As the procedure of elucidation kept on advancing, these working models were improved by the consideration of sound and visual translation strategies, which inquire about demonstrated were seen to be more remunerating for the guest than composed content material, for example, flyers and books (Boyd 2003, p.231). The utilization of data and correspondence innovation is another territory of live understanding that can demonstrate successful, through a procedure of intelligent association or showing films and holographic pictures (Atkinson 2007). As Atkinson (2007) report additionally clarifies, by utilizing ICT it is feasible for the legacy site administration to have the capacity to "customize and tailor shows and encounters to the individual or particular gathering's needs." Nonetheless, today the most direct type of live elucidation is esteemed to be what includes physical up close and personal cooperation between the guest and a delegate or gathering of agents straightforwardly included with the legacy site, either on an intentional or utilized premise (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.184), which most analysts distinguish as a translator. As these creator's call attention to "vis-à-vis elucidation is viewed as the best type of breathing life into the guest encounter" and absolutely influence them to consider that it is time well spent. One essential perspective should be said in regard of the activities of the mediator. This identifies with their level of ability and level of capability. As Boyd (2003, p.195) clarifies, "While live elucidation is esteemed the best type of collaboration amongst guest and the legacy protest, low quality in live translation is more terrible than nothing." In any case, how much the "mediator" breathes life into the legacy experience will rely on the scene and its substance. For instance, they can run from the consideration of a visit manual for costumed characters who re-authorize the history and culture that the legacy site is advancing. This level of variety and the propriety for the legacy setting will be additionally tended to in the accompanying segments of this investigation. Exhibition halls and Galleries Various inquires about have been directed with the aim of finding how much time guests spent in galleries and to what degree the organization and show of the displays impacted the length of visit. One such review, led for the exploration did by Boyd (2003, pp.77-78) found that there was a state of time at which guests enthusiasm for the shows started to disappear and the tendency to "set out toward the exit" started to rule their perspectives. This was particularly observed to be genuine where the translation of the shows depended entirely upon the fundamental methodology of show. For instance, except if the guest has a particular verifiable or scholastic enthusiasm for the particular antiquities being shown inside the setting, which just identifies with a little section of the populace, sooner or later one display, be that a work of art, vase or another sort of lifeless thing, all started to resemble the other alike to the guest. At that stage the joy and taking in picked up from the experience started to break down. There still exists the perfectionist see that will contend against the presentation of live elucidation includes no place inside exhibition halls and displays. Their thinking is that the guest ought to be permitted to decipher the show free from the impact of what the individuals who hold this feeling see to be outside obstruction. In any case, in spite of the fact that as expressed past this may be significant for the individuals who have a committed explanation behind going by the historical center or displays it was getting to be obvious to the troughs of these scenes this was not agreed with by the lion's share of guests upon whom these exhibition halls and displays depended. Consequently, healing and creative activity supposedly was required if the decrease in guest numbers was to be turned around. It wound up obvious that a portion of the key characteristics that guests anticipated that would understanding from review a specific display were clearness, power, engaging quality together with a dynamic introduction (Boyd 2003, p.224). Notwithstanding, on account of numerous guests it demonstrated troublesome accomplish the fulfillment of a significant number of these characteristics except if the question or display was suitably deciphered in any case. This did not imply that the historical centers and displays needed to present moving or exceedingly intuitive understanding procedure for the majority of their shows. In numerous examples it was essentially an issue of presenting a visit manage (Dicks 2003, p.171). This would include utilizing a man who had adequate learning and experience about the show to have the capacity to give a suitable interpretati>GET ANSWER