Step 1: Research Networking and Auxiliary Services in the CloudStep
2: Research Cloud Trends, Best Practices, and Migration Issues
Step 3: Research Typical Architectures of Cloud Deployments
Step 4: Propose Cloud Architecture for BallotOnline Deployment
Step 5: Research AWS
Step 6: Research Microsoft Azure
Step 7: Generate AWS Proof of Concept (POC)
Step 8: Generate Azure Proof of Concept (POC)
Step 9: Write the Final Report Evaluating AWS and Azure Providers
Comparison of architecture deployment feasibility (from Steps 1 – 5)
Describe how the architecture proposed in Step 3 can be implemented in AWS and Azure environments, and compare ease of implementation.
Evaluate and compare efforts to implement BallotOnline business requirements.
Compare availability and ease of use for application scaling, geographical distribution, and network security measures.
Compare availability and ease of use of cloud services required by BallotOnline (database as a service, auditing, logging, application security, etc.).
Compare support for application migration and monitoring.
Comparison of ease of deployment (from Steps 6 and 7)
Describe AWS and Azure capabilities for deploying web applications using the PHP language and MySQL database.
Compare ease of use of user interfaces, portals, and management consoles.
Compare POC environment deployment times.
Comparison of costs
Discuss and compare pricing plans available, costs of servers, and services.
Conclusions and recommendations
Present the final recommendation based on your research and POC deployment.
Key Workers Meeting Abstract Reasonable lodging in London is an issue which influences numerous people and the issue of moderate lodging is especially of worry to less fortunate segments inside London and those in low paid business (Greater London Authority (2005) 1) (Pacione, M. (1997) 8) and (Greater London Authority (2006) 1). This is a circumstance which stays unaltered by the way that there are conspires set up which indicate to improve the issues identifying with moderate lodging experienced by numerous individuals living and working in London (Rugg, R. (1999) 19-20). Plans, for example, the Key Worker Living plan which is controlled through the workplaces of the Deputy Prime Minister, the Teachers Housing Association Scheme and London Strategic Housing have been focused on explicitly at key specialists who experience lodging needs in London. Be that as it may, in spite of the fact that the legislature have made many lodging arrangements for London based key laborers, the issue remains that these arrangements seemingly don't reach out far enough. In particular, it might be contended that the meaning of what a key specialist is maybe excessively limited. It might likewise be contended that the individuals who fall outside the meaning of key laborer, however by the by experience lodging issues are being let somewhere near the legislature, essentially in light of the fact that a large number of them basically don't fit the bill for the plans which have been referenced previously. The way that house costs in London are expanding quickly, and that the normal compensation inside London has not expanded in similar extents hones the hardships experienced by those in low paid work in London, who don't fit the bill for key specialist plans. These contentions will be advanced and assessed in this paper and there will be a more extensive exchange of whether there is any genuine need to keep on having a 'key laborer necessity' to trigger the help which is accessible to those needing lodging support inside London. The paper will likewise consider more extensive monetary, sociological and political factors and will utilize a subjective, evaluative philosophy in doing as such. Who is incorporated inside the meaning of a Key Worker? The general population to whom the status of key specialist is credited to must right off the bat be utilized in the open part administering fundamental administrations in an area where there are issues with enlisting staff and holding their administrations. Classifies of individuals who satisfy this criteria are: clinical staff utilized by the NHS, for instance nurture (specialists and dental specialists are avoided); instructors working in kept up essential and optional instructive organizations; cops, network bolster officials and jail staff; formally dressed staff in the fire and salvage administrations; post trial supervisors and neighborhood expert utilized staff (for instance instructive clinicians) (Department of Communities and Local Housing (2006) 1). Maybe it is additionally astute to remark on which laborers may not fall inside the definition. These divisions may incorporate cleaning staff and care staff inside showing foundations, numerous classes of incompetent workers, bolster staff inside emergency clinics and colleges and the individuals who offer help benefits inside different callings. Why help is especially attached to the Key Worker Sector; and What is being done to help the individuals who are not Key Workers? The basis behind binds lodging help to key laborers is based upon much good judgment. It is reasonable to guarantee that laborers who give key administrations are urged to remain inside key occupations that give helpful administrations to the overall population. Maybe the requirement for such a reason can be brought all the more strongly into center by thinking about what may happen if fundamental specialists were 'valued out of the market'. A situation like this will drain the administrations which are accessible to the whole populace inside a given zone and would maybe affect clinics and schools specifically. It is plain to see consequently why lodging help with terms of reasonable lodging is focused at these parts which might be depicted as containing key specialists. Nonetheless, there is likewise a contention to be made that these arrangements are insufficient, and that they neglect to recognize the more extensive issue which is that reasonable lodging influences numerous people who fall outside the meaning of a key laborer. Actually the issue of moderate lodging is an inescapable one, and, as we have seen clarified over, the meaning of key specialist is a serious tight development. In this way numerous non key specialists have extremely low livelihoods yet don't meet the criteria which are endorsed to give them key laborer lodging help. The administrations which these gatherings give are in reality fundamental; they help to help the everyday running of basic administrations and are consequently significant to the lives of those living in London. It appears to be legitimate thusly that these people ought to be given similar degrees of help that key laborers are given with regards to the issue of moderate lodging. As we have seen clarified over, the fact of the matter is altogether different, and faultfinders of the way that simply key laborers meet all requirements for some plans to give lodging bolster point to the genuine need experienced by the people included; not simply to the more extensive value that lodging bolster plans may bear the cost of the overall population (which is the defense for the linkage between some lodging help and simply key specialists). In any case, is it the case whereby the administration just disregard the requirements of the individuals who don't meet all requirements for lodging help as they are not key laborers? Obviously this isn't the situation. The administration work lodging affiliations and extraordinary needs offices for those people who have needs because of handicap or neediness. The individuals who are on low salaries may meet all requirements for the new assessment credits plans and in fact for rates alleviation or lodging advantage to help reduce the impacts of the moderate lodging issue. Regarding explicit lodging arrangement, non key specialists may exploit some Social Registered Landlord Schemes which incorporate Home Exchange and Right to Acquire Schemes. The Home Exchange plan is available to verify, or guaranteed occupants and includes trading homes between inhabitants with the consent of proprietors; different plans incorporate the Seaside and Country Homes activity which includes the portion of homes to those thought about meriting (not really key laborers); the Homefinder Direct plan which is like the Seaside and Country Homes plot and the LAWN venture which makes homes accessible to ethnic minorities (www.cityoflondon.gov.uk). These plans are expected to help each one of those needing lodging help and not in every case simply key laborers. Be that as it may, what amount of assistance do these plans truly convey? The truth of destitution in London implies that a large number on low livelihoods are not the individuals who might fit the bill for the Home Exchange plan or different plans, since they might not have guaranteed occupancies. Individuals who get lodging help with the type of lodging advantage lose their privilege to profit if their reserve funds are over a specific limit, and subsequently it creates the impression that needy individuals in London, who experience lodging need and who are not secured by the key laborer plans are in a condition of ceaseless destitution. It likewise creates the impression that the administration's primary answer for the lodging issue in London is to propose that individuals inside London should try to move in different territories where lodging and living is less expensive. This is commensurate to in a roundabout way saying that low paid laborers don't have the right to live inside London; for sure the administration's inability to recognize the issue or to manage it in some other manner strengthens this point and successfully classes less fortunate individuals as peons. This frame of mind taken by government likewise takes no thought of the way that numerous individuals who can't bear to live in London, as they are not secured by key specialist plans, and who the administration hopes to just migrate to different pieces of the nation, may have relations who live in London, and may have spent their whole lives there. To anticipate that these individuals should relinquish their underlying foundations is anything but a reasonable answer for the issue of moderate lodging in London. Likewise, given that the administration's primary way to deal with the issue of reasonable lodging for needy individuals who are not secured by key laborer plans is to move, no help is extended to the individuals who really have employment opportunities in London and who are looked with a decision between joblessness constrained through migration, and proceeding to experience lodging need while being utilized in London. None of these issues have simple answers, yet plainly a decent way to deal with the issue is to all the more expressly recognize that there is an issue to begin off with, and it is additionally evident that to just offer help with the type of lodging backing to key specialists is to help one class of individuals in lodging need by making another gatherings' lodging need progressively intense. On the other hand nonetheless, on a full scale and political level the administration have endeavored to utilize the space which is accessible to assemble moderate lodging inside London. This has included the changes of deserted business destinations for use as lodging locales (Greater London Authority (2005) Section 5.4). This is expected to guarantee that accessible space inside London is utilized reasonably to help reduce the impacts of deficiencies in lodging building destinations. Plainly this will be of long haul help to both key laborers and non key specialists. On a large scale level another case of the administration's endeavors around there is their present accentuation on structure 'maintainable urban conditions', an accentuation which is of advantage to those influenced by the reasonable lodging issue, not simply those viewed as key specialists. The administration has likewise led many research activities into recognizing the underlying drivers of moderate lodging issues and intending to dispense with them. Despite the fact that these initiativ>GET ANSWER