Identify your research question or topic.
Identify the two theoretical/philosophical approaches that will be applied to your research topic/question, including the
major contributors to each approach.
Summarize and describe each perspective.
Critically evaluate of the applicability of each approach to your research topic/question, identifying and analyzing the |
strengths, biases, and shortcomings of each. defending your analysis with evidence, logic, and examples from the |
In your conclusion, evaluate the theory and accompanying methodology, identify one as preferred or more accepted within
the field today, and explain why it is preferred.
n small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everythi>GET ANSWER