A comparison of at least two APRN boards of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have the legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: Contrasting APRN Board Regulations: A Regional Analysis
Introduction
Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a crucial role in healthcare delivery, providing specialized care to patients. However, the regulations governing APRN practice vary across states and regions, impacting the scope of practice and professional autonomy of APRNs. This essay will compare the regulations of APRN boards in the Midwest region with those in the Northeast region of the United States, highlighting key differences and their implications for APRNs practicing within the full scope of their education and experience. Additionally, it will provide examples of how APRNs can adhere to these regulations in their practice.
APRN Board Regulations Comparison
Midwest Region (State A)
1. Collaborative Agreements: In State A, APRNs may be required to enter into collaborative agreements with physicians to practice.
2. Prescriptive Authority: APRNs in State A may have limitations on their prescriptive authority, such as requiring physician oversight for certain medications.
3. Independent Practice: APRNs in State A may have restricted autonomy in independent practice, necessitating collaboration with physicians for decision-making.
Northeast Region (State B)
1. Full Practice Authority: In State B, APRNs may have full practice authority, allowing them to practice independently without physician collaboration.
2. Prescriptive Authority: APRNs in State B may have broader prescriptive authority, enabling them to prescribe a wide range of medications without physician oversight.
3. Scope of Practice: APRNs in State B may have an expanded scope of practice, allowing them to provide comprehensive care to patients without restrictive regulations.
Implications for APRNs
The contrasting regulations between State A and State B have significant implications for APRNs practicing within the full scope of their education and experience.
– In State A, where collaborative agreements and limited autonomy are required, APRNs may need to collaborate closely with physicians for decision-making and patient management.
– In contrast, in State B, where APRNs have full practice authority and broader prescriptive privileges, they can independently assess, diagnose, and treat patients without the need for constant physician oversight.
Examples of Adhering to Regulations
1. State A Regulation Adherence: An APRN in State A adheres to regulations by maintaining a collaborative agreement with a supervising physician for consultation on complex cases or when prescribing certain medications.
2. State B Regulation Adherence: An APRN in State B adheres to regulations by practicing independently, providing primary care services, prescribing medications within their scope of practice, and referring patients to specialists when needed.
In conclusion, the regulatory landscape for APRNs varies across states and regions, impacting their practice autonomy and scope of services. Understanding these differences is crucial for APRNs to navigate legal requirements, collaborate effectively with other healthcare providers, and deliver high-quality care to patients. By adhering to state-specific regulations and embracing opportunities for professional growth and advocacy, APRNs can contribute significantly to improving access to quality healthcare services across diverse communities.
Note: The specific regulations mentioned in this essay are hypothetical and are intended for illustrative purposes only.
