Case: Jessica is 17 years of Latina. She is a high school senior. Jessica arrives in Ms. Laymen’s office after a teacher gave her a pass to see the school counselor. Ms. Laymen knew that Jessica was pregnant as this type of news travels fast in small-town, Wisconsin. Jessica looks piqued and lays her head on provider’s desk. “Oh, I just hate this feeling. You know my boyfriend hates the fact that I am pregnant, which is strange because he wants children…not just now though,” says Jessica opening the conversation. Ms. Laymen reminds Jessica that she can consult her physician for medication for help to help with the morning sickness and encourages her to do so. Next, Ms. Laymen listens as Jessica shares that she really does not want to take the medication as it could possibly physically affect the baby, even though she has been assured by her health care provider that the medication has not been identified as a curical concerns for developing the embryo, would likely make her morning more bearable. Jessica offers she’ll talk to the school nurse again to review the benefits risks of the nausea medication. To encourage further sharing, Ms. Laymen makes reference to Jessica’s admirable determination to finish high school. Jessica needs little prompting on this topic and responds by giving a 3-minute diatribe of how she (Jessica) will never be poor again and education is her key to getting out of misery. In her sharing, she asserts she and her baby will stay with her boyfriend until she finds another opportunity to live a decent life without “so many” challenges. After another 3-minutes of erengetic spewing of the merits of education, a loving family, hatred of poverty, and assertions that she is a survivor, Ms. Laymen was able to gently probe about Jessica’s life of challenges. What followed was Jessica sharing a life of enigmas, injuctices, and perseverance of a 17-years old girl who has lived through several lives of tragedies. Her first tragic life she titles “Little Wife” AT age 11, when her parents divorced, her mother could not pay rent, and she befriended a man who sexually abused Jessica. Jessica’s dysfunctional home became worse when the boyfriend became “husband” within their home and Jessica shared a bedroom with him. Jessica was accountable to wash his clothes amd make his meals. Her abuse inadvertently secured the family’s rent for 18 months because he ensured that Jessica’s mother’s rent was paid????????????????????? regularly, if sexual encounters continued. After about a year and a half, he left home. Jessica was understandably relieved in his absence, and she was able to return to school on consist basis. After 4 months, however, he returned home and to their previous living arrangement. Jessica ran away from her mother’s home when she was 14 years old. Jessica’s second tragic life is that of the “Nomadic Surfer”. She was now 14 years old runaway. This life began with her living several months on the street behind a food factory that discarded food evening. Jessica got her meals from dumpsters and occasionally got money from patrons at a nearby Karaoke bar. Eventually, she befriended a bar waitress, who took her in and cleaned her up. The waitress’s home was “decked out” and the waitress had lots of extra spending money. Jessica soon learned that the waitress also worked as an escort. Though the waitress kept Jessica safe from her johns, Jessica understood her safety was not secure in this envirnment. However Jessica was glad to be back in school anc choose to do many after school activities to stay away from her new home. Jessica’s natural academic gifting kept her academically afloat in all her courses, and when she attended school regularly, she was a model student. To make freinds and to keep up the fashion, Jessica stole clothes from waitress freind. Jessica overheard the conversation between the waitress and one of her johns. The john offered money for sex with Jessica. Jessica left the home before the waitress could assured her that this would not happen. Jessica moved back in with her mother, who had a new boyfriend with lots of freinds. Her mother was extremely disappointed and initially responded harshly after finding out Jessica was pregnant. She agreed to support to support her during her pregnancy but asked her to be prepared to leave home on the arrival of the baby as the family could not support her financially while still having to care for her four younger siblings. On hearing this, one of the friend (Paul) offered to let Jessica live with him. so that she could be away from her troubled mother. Jessica left her mother’s home after a heated argument between them. She moved in with her newfound friend -Paul. Assignment: As Jessica’s Counselor, what theory of therapy would be choose for her and describe 3 long-term goals that you would like Jessica achieve.
EU Environmental Policy Criticisms Disclaimer: This work has been presented by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert scholarly journalists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, ends or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Distributed: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 EU ecological arrangement is no natural approach by any stretch of the imagination; it is in reality close to an augmentation of monetary strategy. Talk about. Point by point underneath is a far reaching talk of the contentions for and against the idea that EU natural strategy is no ecological arrangement at all and is just in reality an expansion of the network's monetary approach. The EU Commission has surely made cases about the significance and the broad extent of its own ecological strategy as of late, particularly since the late 1980s. There are contentions that can be made to protect or disprove the idea that the EU's ecological arrangement isn't so broad or surely as far extending as it may have all the earmarks of being. Contentions in support too of natural arrangement are just a component or an augmentation of the EU's financial approach. The connections between the EU's natural and monetary strategy, as will be examined, are not really direct regardless of whether the beginnings of ecological arrangement would have all the earmarks of being so. Because of the establishing standards and structures of the EU it could be contended that all non-financial arrangement regions initially created from a beginning stage inside the network economy, as it was initially a network that restricted its transmit to monetary approach aside from in the most excellent of conditions. Notwithstanding, there has been most quite as the EU Commission, components inside the EU that trust the network ought to have a substantially more extensive circle of approach making than simply financial strategy. Essentially to drive the joining forms forward and tackle any basic issues or issues upon a network premise instead of on a national premise. The starting points of EU natural approach are evidently established in the financial strategy of the EU. There are different reasons with respect to why that is the situation. The EU as an association was built up to advance solid monetary development inside its part states. To the extent the originators of the EU were worried, there was no need isolate ecological arrangement as no one in the 1950s knew or trusted that natural issues were even a worry, let alone of basic significance to the long haul fate of Europe. The principal venturing stone while in transit to the development of the EU was the foundation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in 1952 that coordinated coal and steel generation in the six unique part states. Coal and steel generation were viewed similar to the most vital components of advancing abnormal amounts of development in Western Europe (Judt, 2007, p.156). The accomplishment of the ECSC prompted the development of the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1957 with an extended extension to coordinate financial arrangement inside the part states. It was a development, which prompted the presentation of the Common Agricultural Policy to secure the rural areas of the nations inside the network. There were clearly ecological results of the monetary strategy sought after by the commencement of the network, these were not known (James, 2003, p.400). The EU and none of its part states had point by point or methodical ecological arrangement in the 1950s or the 1960s; regardless of whether there were any natural issues those issues would be settled upon a specially appointed premise. Not very many individuals around then took a genuine perspective of natural issues (Thompson, 2001, p.199). At the point when the EU Commission started to respect ecological issues of being some importance to the personal satisfaction, it thought that it was hard to convince the legislatures of part expresses that they expected to make a move to enhance the earth (Sawka and Stevens, 2000, p.156). Seemingly, it took more time for the EU to create ecological approach, as its part states did not trust that there were any practical explanations behind the foundation of such natural strategy. A few administrations of the EU part states will probably be open to the thoughts of tree hugger bunches than different governments are. For example, West Germany and the Netherlands (Eatwell and Wright, 2003, p.233). The EU Commission regarded the improvement of natural arrangement as an expansion on to its monetary strategy, which bore its first organic product in the appropriation of an ecological program in 1972. The main program went for decreasing the contamination connected with modern and farming generation procedures (Jones et al, 2004 p.696). Regarding really enhancing the condition the early projects of the EU were constrained in standpoint and did not need to be completely embraced by the part conditions of the EU. Unquestionably when alluding to EU natural arrangement in the 1970s, guarantee that EU ecological strategy was not approach at all could be completely legitimized. The EU Commission was very much aware around then with regards to the furthest reaches of its own capacity to seek after approach that wandered too a long way from its financial strategy and the restricted degree to which such arrangement would really be done (Wallace and Wallace, 2000 p. 62). The restricted EU natural arrangement that developed amid the 1970s was impacted by expanded logical proof of ecological contamination and change, there were political and monetary purposes behind the endeavors at shaping strategy. One factor was the backing off of monetary development, which had beforehand been great amid the 1950s and the 1960s; the EU Commission investigated methods for invigorating financial development in elective ways. Another factor for considering the selection of natural approach was given by the Oil Crisis of 1973. The Oil Crisis was incited by the United States bolster for Israel amid the Yom Kippur War that brought about the Arab oil makers slicing off oil supplies to the United States, the EU and Japan. The Oil Crisis prompted critical value rises that incited a global financial downturn (Hobsbawm, 1994, p.245). The impact of the Oil Crisis upon the EU ecological arrangement would turn out to be here and now and brief. Part states responded diversely to the acknowledgment of exactly how subordinate their financial development was on oil. The Netherlands and West Germany tried constrained endeavors to enhance eco-friendliness, France focused on keeping up great relations with the Arab States and just Britain by then had its own oil supplies (*). For the EU Commission the Oil Crisis of 1973 was adequate exhibition of the requirement for more coordinated monetary and even natural strategy, as opposed to leaving singular part states to settle on their own choices. Natural arrangement was unquestionably auxiliary to financial strategy and if monetary approach was not adequate, at that point ecological strategy was seemingly no arrangement by any stretch of the imagination (Bache and George, 2006 p. 10). Worries about contamination remained the principle factors impacting the advancement and development of the EU's ecological approach. The EU Commission and the new Environment Directorate-General it built up in 1981 looked to give EU ecological arrangement a higher open profile in the mid 1980s. In any case, the effect of such exposure was irrelevant in contrast with the hard hitting subsidence provoked and exacerbated by the sharp ascent in unrefined petroleum costs amid 1979, which were an outcome of the Iranian Revolution (Jones et al, 2004, p.695). The Environment Directorate-General endeavored to expand the stimulus of the EU's ecological approach by setting harder focuses to lessen air, water and land contamination, and in addition looking to change the Common Agricultural Policy to diminish levels of soil disintegration and utilization of synthetic compounds. At the point when the EU commission and the Environment Directorate-General tried to lessen the utilization of substance composts, pesticides to diminish the ecological harm caused by the serious cultivating strategies effectively advanced by the Common Agricultural Policy. In the mid 1980s the requests of the EU's ecological arrangement chiefs to diminish the natural effect of the Common Agricultural Policy were, all things considered, disregarded. In fact the main requests to change the Common Agricultural Policy that stood any practical possibility of being effective identified with the EU thinking about the alternative of decreasing the Common Agricultural Policy consumption (Cini, 2003, p.256). The effect and impact of the EU's natural arrangement would begin to increment from the center of the 1980s. Albeit preceding that time its strategy had been so restricted when put into activity that it just had an insignificant effect, best case scenario to lessening naturally unsafe practices inside the EU. Onlookers of the EU's natural arrangement could absolutely had been excused that there was no strategy in activity by any means (Sawka and Stevens, 2000, p.156). The incapability of the EU's most punctual natural approach was down to part states putting their monetary advantages first. It was because of the absence of reasonable approach and technique set forward by the Environment Directorate-General and the EU Commission, and in addition the boundless conviction that ecological issues were not unreasonably essential (Wallace and Wallace, 2000 p.30). There are be that as it may, contentions that EU natural is very an unmistakable and progressively essential strategy region inside its own right. Ecological arrangement may have advanced as a major aspect of the EU monetary approach, yet it is an over disentanglement to battle that it's anything but a natural strategy by any means. The first structures of the EU implied that the essential focal point of the network is financial, as full assention couldn't be come to on different highlights of the EU. The legislatures of part states were primarily substance to impart capacity to the EU when it came to>GET ANSWER