Our health care management program is undergoing Q2S transformation and plan to apply for AUPHA Certification in the future. In order to meet the
AUPHA’s requirements, we are modifying some of our courses to include AUPHA’s content areas, where applicable.
Revise the course descriptions and consider how the course can be revised to include some of the relevant AUPHA content areas, when applicable. Add your
revised course name/descriptions to #3 in the Word document.
(Half page for each course. Your responses MUST be original and no references needed. Please your responses MUST be standard as it will be used toward
accreditation process of this program)
1) Current Name/Description: HSCI 160. Strategic Planning and Marketing in the Health Care System
Strategy-oriented management planning process, basic approaches and methodologies employed in strategic planning and health care marketing; economic
and political forces which give form and shape to the health care marketplace.
2) AUPHA Content Area to consider in revised course description (see below):
Healthcare marketing: Examines the basic marketing principles and applies them to the health care field. Analyzes the diversity of the health care
consumer’s definition of care, along with the need to distinguish between individual patients versus corporate America as a customer. Examines the various
healthcare delivery models as changers of healthcare marketing.
Strategy formulation and implementation: Examines the steps and processes associated with strategic planning, as well as the need for strategic planning
and the difficulty of doing this in healthcare delivery. Explores the linkages between mission and strategic planning and examines the roles of all
stakeholders in the strategic planning process.
3) New Course Name/Description for HSCI XXXX:
Revised course description here.
1) Current Name/Description: HSCI 113. Managed Care Systems.
Principles and process of utilization management, risk contracting, capitation, provider contracting, contract negotiations, division of financial responsibility,
and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) relationships, including quality outcomes measurements, patient satisfaction, and the specialist referral
2) AUPHA Content Areas to consider in revised course description (see below):
Post-acute care: Examines services provided after hospitalization by skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes, home health
care, and long term care hospitals. A key component of post- acute care is the co-ordination from a central point to effect smooth transitions. Create
understanding of how this care fits into the continuum of care in managing risk in a healthcare reform environment.
Quality assessment for patient care improvement: Examines the various outcomes assessment tools, and their reliability and accuracy. Explores how
healthcare delivery systems can better measure outcomes from both patient and organizational perspectives. Analyzes quality improvement programs and
examines their adaptability to the healthcare environment.
Ethics in business and clinical decision-making: Explores and analyzes contemporary health care situations in terms of ethical dimensions. Topics may
include patient-care giver relationships, high-tech medicine, ICU dilemmas, medical experimentation, and confidentiality of patient medical records, AIDS
and ethics, death and dying, and the issues of an aging population. Genetic research and its application to patient care may also be explored. Explains
issues around contracts and reimbursement in terms of ethical practices and conduct.
This appraisal ought to be composed and organized as a business report. Select one of the accompanying Operations Management themes (please note that you may likewise choose a sub-point inside every one of the primary subjects): • Lean activities • Quality administration You are relied upon to set up a report based on the accompanying goals. 1. A concise portrayal and diagram of the point chose. This segment may incorporate illustrations, contextual analyses or vignettes from genuine life tasks that are sourced from both the scholarly (e.g. diary papers, original copies) and non-scholastic (e.g. financial analyst, business week and so forth) writings. 2. An investigation of the theme with respect to their commitment to the execution of activities. For instance, what is the connection between lean tasks what's more, firm execution? Specifically, I hope to see a blend of observational confirmation that is accessible in the current scholarly and specialist writing. It would be ideal if you take note of that this proof can be either quantitative or subjective (I don't have an inclination as long as the confirmation is strong). 3. Solid examination will likewise incorporate logical variables. For instance, the effect of TQM programs on execution might be for the most part positive but at the same time is appeared to change agreeing to level of authoritative control (Douglas and Judge, 2001), and firm size (Hendricks and Singhal, 2001 - see full references in the Modules area - Composed Assessment). Your work could show prove for this and a talk of the purposes behind the possibility impact. 4. A rundown and conclusion in light of your discoveries. Sources: Your investigation will be founded on foundation perusing and you ought to give references from scholarly and in addition professional articles to legitimize your presumptions and articulations. Your perusing could incorporate yet not really restricted to the accompanying proposed Diaries: 1. Diary of Operations Management 2. Global Journal of Operations and Production Management 3. Diary of Supply Chain Management 4. Creation and Operations Management 5. Sloan Management Review 6. Harvard Business Review 7. Universal Journal of Production Research FAQs: 1) How would I structure my report? I recommend the accompanying structure: 1. Presentation 2. Subject: portrayal, examination, and conceivably logical variables 3. Conclusions 2) How would I recognize the variables in charge of execution? You ought to counsel the scholarly writing to comprehend the components basic each of the point territories. A decent place to begin is a meta-examination, for instance: Mackelprang, A. W., and Nair, A. (2010). Connection between in the nick of time fabricating practices and execution: A meta-systematic examination. Diary of Tasks Management, 28(4), 283-302. From here you can begin to comprehend the immediate impact of each factor on the different measurements of tasks execution (e.g. cost, quality, conveyance, adaptability) as well as association execution (e.g. money related execution). 3) How much confirmation is required? Ordinarily, the more proof the better, in any case, I would expect at least 10 scholastic references to be utilized for the chosen theme. Report Specifications Your report ought to be of 2000 words (±10%). As far as possible allude to the principle body of content and rejects informative supplements, tables, references and official synopsis (on the off chance that you choose you require one). If you don't mind utilize the APA referencing framework. Points of interest: The writing audit in an exposition serves to light up the examination hole and in this way legitimize the need of the investigation and the proposed ponder system. Despite the fact that this reason stays reliable over all approachs, the structure of the writing audit area of a subjective exposition regularly varies somewhat from that of a quantitative paper. For instance, writing audits in quantitative expositions are predominantly developed around the factors while those in subjective theses can be built from multiple points of view. In this task, you will differentiate the structures of a subjective and a quantitative writing audit and think about a basis for those distinctions. General Requirements: Utilize the accompanying data to guarantee effective finish of the task: Survey the Vangilder (subjective) paper. Survey the Wigton (quantitative) paper. This task utilizes a rubric. It would be ideal if you survey the rubric preceding starting the task to get comfortable with the desires for effective culmination. APA style is required for this task. You are required to present this task to Turnitin. Bearings: Compose a paper (500-750 words) in which you differentiate the structures of the subjective and quantitative papers referenced above and give a method of reasoning for the distinctions. Incorporate the accompanying in your paper: 1. A reasonable depiction of the essential contrasts between the structures of the writing audits. 2. A justification for the watched contrasts. What factors added to the distinctions the structures of these writing audits? RES-845-RS-WigtonQuantDissertation.pdf RES-845-RS-VangilderQualDissertation.pdf>GET ANSWER