I believe that while there are certainly areas where progress can be made in terms of streamlining processes and increasing communication between different parts of the criminal justice system national level, there are also still many effective components present today. For example, law enforcement agencies around the country have adopted newer technologies like body cameras for officers which help increase transparency and accountability when dealing with citizens during interactions on patrol. Additionally, various departments have implemented review boards designed specifically gauge effectiveness certain policies procedures ensuring they comply both applicable laws public opinion alike other examples show how despite its fractured nature many good things happening keep America safe secure moving forward. Ultimately though even if reforms take place maintain true sense continuity throughout entire non-system impossible due sheer number entities involved each playing role decision making process some capacity; this why focusing on improving smaller portions though may not seem much make big difference overall betterment infrastructure itself down line being sure contact open channels communication lines stay tight amongst stakeholders best way ensure smooth flow information authorities able properly utilize resources available them order create just society possible future generations come will benefit greatly from any progress made today tomorrow ahead us let hope everybody works together achieve common goal everyone’s benefit!

Sample Solution

The criminal justice system has been referred to as the criminal justice “non-system” because it is far from an organized and systematic approach to crime control and prevention. Instead, it is a disjointed conglomeration of many different parts that are all operating at local, state, and federal levels with little coordination. It is difficult for any single entity to understand or regulate the entirety of the system since each part is so independent from one another. This lack of organization makes it hard for those within the criminal justice system to produce consistent outcomes without taking into account extraneous factors such as race, gender, socioeconomic status etc., which can lead to disparities in sentencing decisions.