Crisis and risk management are both involved with dealing with threats to an organization. Depending on the threats faced, an organization can mitigate or eliminate the threat by implementing a management program. Both crisis and risk management deal with threats, but risk management deals with threats before the event occurs and crisis management deals with a threat as it unfolds or after the event occurs. Some of the types of crises can include natural phenomena, malfunctioning equipment, human error, confrontation (strikes, boycotts, etc.), malevolence (intentional efforts to harm a company), and flawed leadership.
For this Case Assignment, you are to answer the following:
Explain the difference between risk and crisis management and the role of the National Response Framework and the National Incident Management System plays.
Do you consider crisis management a part of risk management? Justify your answer.
Describe the types of crises faced by your organization today. In your opinion, which type is the most important to be prepared for and why?
Envision an underground collapse which people are shackled by their necks to a solitary place. They have been held there the greater part of their lives. Flames put behind the gathering by concealed powers have left these detainees to see their own particular shadows play upon a screen. Those held are not in any case mindful that the pictures and shadows that they see are themselves. However, these shadows hold influence; the detainees are captivated. The hallucination so compelling, that the detainees don't perceive their detainment and are fulfilled to experience their lives along these lines. What might happen in the event that one of these detainees would be sans set? The detainee would be defenseless, his eyes would be over-burden, and he couldn't stand up individually. Immersed with tactile data, his psyche would decline to acknowledge what the faculties were submitting as evident. It would not shock on the off chance that anybody discharged from such a jail would wish to remain. Remain with the known. Remain with what is agreeable. Not for our detainee however. Our detainee, compelled to get some distance from the fire, starts a long awkward excursion through a passage toward a blinding light cajoled by the deliverer toward the awkward. The light is blinding. At long last rising up out of the surrender, eyes consuming, faculties seething, the detainee before long finds another, impossible world. Never again captivated by shadow, the detainee is allowed to find out about the world, and all the more vitally, themselves. This paper will investigate how this story has been meant current gatherings of people through the film, The Matrix (Wachowski Bros 1999). Plato's give in fantasy has been a magnificent purposeful anecdote for the mission for learning for a long time. Plato distributed this surrender fantasy in The Republic; the purposeful anecdote of the give in is seemingly the most celebrated segment of this work. What may come as an astonishment to numerous is that there are parallels to the give in fantasy in a large number of the present contemporary stories. One of which, is the story of Neo in The Matrix (Wachowski Bros 1999). Who can overlook the picture when Neo wakes to end up bound in a tube, he battles free, discharged from his jail, he is made to get a handle on reality of his life and the world. He finds that the greater part of his life up to that point has been a detailed figment made for him to conceal him from the way that he been held detainee his whole life. This paper will demonstrate that both of these stories mirror a Socratic scan for learning and a more profound comprehension of the great. The legend of the surrender is a moral story in which we take after our prisoner on his mission for what Socrates, Plato's instructor, alluded to as "the equitable life" (Plato: The Republic). Socrates essential concern was that our spirits be in the most ideal condition (Plato: Phaedo). The manner by which this is proficient is through examination and scrutinizing one's place inside the world. The buckle fantasy gives an artistic record of the Socratic Method, too a case with regards to the rationale and approach of Socrates tireless addressing. Along these lines, we have a view into Socrates philosophy, and moreover, into Socrates' idea for "care of the spirit" (Plato: Phaedo). Socrates' care of the spirit is included these four components: convictions in importance, affirmation of numbness, addressing of the real world, and expectation in an answer, or to put it another path, trust in the learning of the great (Plato: Phaedo). Regarding this matter of care of the spirit, there is a profound similarity between The Matrix (Wachowski Bros 1999)and Plato's moral story (Plato: The Republic). We can make a closer examination into the correlation amongst Neo and our detainee on his journey for the care of the spirit. Like the moral story of the Cave, The Matrix significantly passes on the view that conventional appearances don't portray genuine reality and that picking up reality changes one's life. Utilizing the thoughts of care of the spirit, we are requested to inspect faith in importance. Saying this contrastingly we are requested to accept what we hold to be valid. The detainees can separate shadows and sounds, apply names to the shadows delineating things and even observe the examples in their introduction. To this degree, they have some evident convictions and some false suppositions, yet before the talk relapses into a magical exercise; regardless of whether a thing is a thing since we name it along these lines, or regardless of whether the thing has its own natural "thingness" it is protected to state that we would all be able to hold a few things to be valid. Nonetheless, there are things that are strange to all on account of the buckle and in The Matrix. In the two stories, there is inescapable picture of the inconspicuous hand at work; the individuals who are in charge of the structure of the buckle and the world in which the network exists. In an internet posting, John Partridge, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Wheaton College, investigates the relationship between's these two stories. He recommends that, Numerous contemporary perusers draw back at the dreadful legislative issues of the Cave. Who, all things considered, are the "puppeteers"? For what reason do they mislead their kindred surrender tenants (Partridge)? It is just through the comprehension and acknowledgment that there is a concealed hand, or certainties with which we had been unmindful, that we can completely come to take in reality. For the detainee, it is through his discharge that he comes to understand that his thought of truth is skewed. For Neo, he had been suspicious of his world for quite a while and looks for comprehension. The entrancing thing for Neo is that when his circumstance reaches a crucial stage and he at last meets Morpheus, his emancipator and educator, he is educated that he can't be told what is false, he should be appeared. Strangely, Neo is managed a decision, the way of numbness as a blue pill or the way of learning as a red pill. The taking of the red pill is a confirmation of obliviousness. Along these lines, the thought of affirmation of obliviousness is constrained on him as a decision. The detainee and Neo are comparative, they should be brought into the light of learning, and into the confirmation of their own numbness. The similitudes proceed with, they both offer a typical way to understanding that their ideas of truth have been given to them and that reality itself isn't what it appears. Alternately, there are a few contrasts between the two stories by method for the coming to affirmation of obliviousness and the comprehension of truth. Neo's way to understanding truth is one that begins with him living easily with the sneaking doubt that there is a something not exactly appropriate with the world. His journey to comprehend what isn't right with the world leads him unyieldingly into an exceptionally dim and tragic reality loaded with strife and hopelessness. Their solitary object is as nourishment for "the machines". Besides, it is a world with individuals constrained underground. His mission actually drives him into the give in. By differentiate, we have the tale of the detainee. The detainee is discharged from subjugation. He/She didn't effectively look to comprehend their reality or procure new information. He/She would have been similarly as cheerful watching shadows on the screen. The way to comprehension may have been troublesome and awkward, yet at last, the detainee is prompt the "light" of information, an idealistic world inside which the detainee is presently genuinely free. Neo, recognizing what being a detainee implies, has his biggest feelings of dread acknowledged when he finds that he has dependably been a slave and is currently consigned to a frightful presence. The detainee, then again, goes to the acknowledgment of what being a detainee implies, and is enchanted with his/her new life. Along these lines, we have the juxtaposition of the goal versus the subjective. The following fundamental of understanding Socrates' care of the spirit is the scrutinizing of the real world. Discharged from the deceptive world, our detainee is lead down the way of comprehension. Socrates states, and afterward imagine somebody saying to him, that what he saw before was a hallucination, yet that now, when he is moving toward closer to being and his eye is turned towards all the more genuine presence, he has a clearer vision, what will be his answer (Plato: The Republic)? What might his answer be? He would be drawn into addressing everything after he currently trusts that he had been confused this time. This is the place we would discover Neo brought once more into the network for preparing by Morpheus, again we have a converse of substances yet the points are the same. The detainee is coming to address and comprehend this present reality. Neo is coming to address and comprehend the incredible universe of the network. Presently we are jumping into the universe of the supernatural. Observing whether we can decide reality in both of these two universes is a genuine issue. Partridge states, Since this present reality and the mimicked world are universes in which the faculties get data, the useful issue isn't that they are spasmodic, yet that they are ambiguous (Partridge). This is a genuine issue for Neo; as we find after his kung fu preparing with Morpheus, when his instructor addresses Neo's comprehension of the real world, "You trust your extremely relaxing"? He is later told, happening upon a kid bowing spoons with his brain in Yuri Gellar mold, that he will just come to comprehend the genuine idea of the grid once he comes to comprehend that in the network, "there is no spoon" (The Matrix). It appears as if the contrasts between the two stories on a supernatural level does not repress them from sending a comparable message. They both send the message of the trickiness of the epistemological data accumulated through the faculties. They push a need to disengage from the faculties with a specific end goal to accomplish real learning. The stories additionally brilliantly show the mental hardship that is put on the characters doing so. Along these lines, the inquiry, by what implies does Neo come to find trust in an answer or trust in his insight into the great. For our detainee, the inquiry is addressed briefly, Last of he will have the capacity to see the sun, and not unimportant impressions of him in the water, but rather he will see him in his own particular legitimate place, and not in>GET ANSWER