Critique of the Article "Design a Sustainable Online Advising Option"
Read and critique the article Design a Sustainable Online Advising Option. This articles explore trends, issues and current events in advising and counseling college students.
For this assignment you will create a well -written ESSAY. The critique requires that you evaluate (not just review) the article and the authors position or argument. To complete this type of essay, you must look critically at what the author(s) claims, evaluate the articles methods, use of theory, etc. and look for possible problems with the author's applications of theory or with the researchers claims.
In your introduction, give an overview of the authors main point(s) and an explanation of how the author supports his point(s). Explain what the author discovered and describe the process he or she used to arrive at this conclusion.
Next in the body of the critique, interpret the information from the article. The following website provides tips for critiquing journal articles:
Finally, summarize the critique in a well written conclusion. In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the authors work, relating the researchers work to your own knowledge or to topics that youve read about in this course.
Critique of the Article "Design a Sustainable Online Advising Option"
Introduction
The article "Design a Sustainable Online Advising Option" delves into exploring trends, issues, and current events in advising and counseling college students. The author's main point revolves around the importance of creating a sustainable online advising option to cater to the evolving needs of college students. The author supports this point by highlighting the increasing demand for online services, the challenges faced by traditional advising methods, and the potential benefits of implementing an online advising platform. The author discovered that there is a significant opportunity to enhance the advising and counseling experience for college students through technology-driven solutions. The process used to arrive at this conclusion likely involved analyzing current advising practices, conducting research on student preferences, and exploring successful case studies of online advising initiatives.
Body
Interpretation of Information
Upon reviewing the article, several strengths and weaknesses become apparent. The author effectively outlines the rationale behind the need for an online advising option, citing factors such as accessibility, convenience, and scalability. The incorporation of relevant data and statistics adds credibility to the author's arguments, demonstrating a well-researched approach. Additionally, the discussion on the potential impact of online advising on student engagement and retention is insightful and aligns with emerging trends in higher education.
However, there are some areas that warrant critique. The article lacks a nuanced discussion on the limitations and challenges associated with online advising, such as digital divide issues, privacy concerns, or the potential loss of personalized interactions. A more comprehensive analysis of these factors would have provided a more balanced perspective on the topic. Furthermore, while the benefits of online advising are highlighted, there is limited exploration of how to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of such platforms in the long term.
Evaluation of Methods and Use of Theory
The article could benefit from a more explicit explanation of the theoretical framework underpinning the argument for online advising. By incorporating relevant counseling theories or educational psychology principles, the author could have offered a deeper understanding of how online advising can effectively support student development and success. Additionally, a more detailed description of the methodology used to gather data and insights would have enhanced the transparency and credibility of the research findings presented.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the article "Design a Sustainable Online Advising Option" presents a compelling argument for leveraging technology to enhance advising services for college students. While the author effectively articulates the benefits of online advising and acknowledges its potential to address current challenges in higher education, there are areas for improvement in terms of considering potential drawbacks, incorporating theoretical frameworks, and providing methodological clarity. Moving forward, future research in this area could benefit from a more holistic approach that considers both the opportunities and limitations of online advising to ensure its sustainability and effectiveness in supporting student success.