Critiquing Bulanda and McCrea’s 2013 article, “The Promise of an Accumulation of Care,”

by | Mar 11, 2023 | sociology

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the following:

Navarro, D. J., Foxcroft, D. R., & Faulkenberry, T. J. (2019). Learning statistics with JASP: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. https://learnstatswithjasp.com/
Chapter 9, “Categorical Data Analysis [PDF].”
Bulanda, J. J., & McCrea, K. T. (2013). The promise of an accumulation of care: Disadvantaged African-American youths’ perspectives about what makes an after school program meaningful. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 30(2), 95–118.
Pell Institute. (n.d.). Analyze qualitative data. http://toolkit.pellinstitute.org/evaluation-guide/analyze/analyze-qualitative-data/

For this discussion:

Critique Bulanda and McCrea’s 2013 article, “The Promise of an Accumulation of Care,” which uses a qualitative program evaluation model.
What are the strengths of the design?
What are weaknesses or limitations to the methodology, analysis, and conclusions drawn from the data?
How would you recommend strengthening the design?
Apply concepts of qualitative research to the program evaluation design that you started in the previous discussion posts based on a previous or current work, internship, or volunteer experience.
How would you collect qualitative data and analyze it?

Sample Solution

Bulanda and McCrea\’s 2013 article “The Promise of an Accumulation of Care” is a prime example of how to use qualitative program evaluation models to assess after school programs. The authors are able to effectively capture the experiences of disadvantaged African-American youths, which provides invaluable insight into what makes theprogram meaningful for them. Furthermore, the researchers employ a variety of methods such as interviews, focus groups and surveys in order to collect data from participants.

Sample Solution

Bulanda and McCrea\’s 2013 article “The Promise of an Accumulation of Care” is a prime example of how to use qualitative program evaluation models to assess after school programs. The authors are able to effectively capture the experiences of disadvantaged African-American youths, which provides invaluable insight into what makes theprogram meaningful for them. Furthermore, the researchers employ a variety of methods such as interviews, focus groups and surveys in order to collect data from participants.

One strength of this design is that it is well-suited for examining complex social issues since it allows researchers to collect subjective information from participants in addition to objective facts. This gives a greater depth and breadth of understanding when compared with quantitative data collection methods alone. Additionally, the researchers use grounded theory analysis which takes themes found within participant responses throughout interviews and other activities in order to reach conclusions about their findings – something often overlooked by strictly quantitative approaches.

Despite these strengths though there are some weaknesses or limitations present too; namely its relatively small sample size (n=25) which can overlook important nuances that may be present due lack statistical power here; additionally generalizability across different populations not guaranteed either despite being previously stated desired outcome by authors early on paper so should probably take care note further studies needed support any claims made later during text (i.e., target audience). With all said done though I would recommend strengthening design further implementing mixed-method approach incorporating both quantitative & qualitative elements together better understand complexities underlying problem area being explored plus also increasing sample size provide more reliable results too 😉

In terms collecting & analyzing qualitative data then key concepts include observing behavior patterns among participants while they interact with each other/environment comprising program setting itself but also using open ended questions encourage people think deeper about certain topics discussed session (i.e., what surprised you most today?); finally conducting follow up research after initial assessment complete always good idea check back see if any changes occurred over time don’t forget!

This question has been answered.

Get Answer