Write two paragraph about Ethics and issues in Bioprocess.
1, there are 5 products, choose fifth product ‘culture meat’ and write a paragraph about it.The link I will provide below.
2,Under each of the following subheadings, write a paragraph to describe howthat companys technology could have social/environmental consequences in each ofthe following areas:
A, Sustainability. B, Naturalness. C, Risk Management. D, Innovation trajectories. E, Economic Justice.
3, Your answer should clearly state if a consequence is beneficial or detrimental to the company consumer some sector of society or the environment and describe why/howthis would be case. Both beneficial and detrimental consequences should be discussedfor each subheading to give a balanced account and specific examples relating to yourproduct/technology should be given to help illustrate ideas.
4, Do not use first personnarrative. Information from websites or articles should be cited asreferences.
6, for the second paragraph, Write a paragraph giving your opinion on which societal/environmental issuea member of the public would find the most controversial for your chosen product.Justify your response as to why they would choose that issue to be the mostcontroversial. Propose some ideas on how this issue could be dealt with to make theproduct more acceptable for the chosen issue. You may use first person narrative.
7, Use full sentences and paragraphs for your answer. Do not give your answer as aseries of bullet points.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Culture Meat: A New Frontier in Food Production
Culture meat, also known as lab-grown or cell-cultured meat, represents a significant shift in how society approaches food production. Unlike traditional meat, which is derived from animal slaughter, culture meat is produced by culturing animal cells in a lab environment, allowing for the creation of meat products without raising and killing livestock. This innovative method offers the potential to reduce the environmental impact of meat production significantly, including lower greenhouse gas emissions, reduced land use, and less water consumption. Additionally, culture meat can address ethical concerns surrounding animal welfare, as it eliminates the need for animal slaughter. However, it also raises questions regarding its acceptance among consumers, regulatory frameworks, and the implications for traditional livestock farmers (Post, 2012).
A. Sustainability
The production of culture meat has notable sustainability benefits. By reducing the reliance on conventional livestock farming, it can lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions and a decrease in land and water usage. For instance, studies have shown that lab-grown meat can cut emissions by up to 96% compared to traditional beef production (Tuomisto & Teixeira de Mattos, 2011). However, the technology is not without its drawbacks. The energy-intensive processes involved in culturing cells may negate some of these benefits if renewable energy sources are not utilized. Therefore, while culture meat has the potential to be a more sustainable option, its overall environmental footprint will depend on the energy sources employed during production.
B. Naturalness
Culture meat often faces criticism regarding its “naturalness.” Many consumers perceive lab-grown products as artificial or unnatural due to their production methods. This perception can be detrimental to consumer acceptance and market penetration. On the other hand, proponents argue that culture meat is a more humane and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional meat production, which involves animal suffering and significant resource use. Balancing these perspectives is crucial; educating consumers about the science behind culture meat may help bridge the gap between naturalness and innovation, promoting acceptance of this technology.
C. Risk Management
The introduction of culture meat raises several risk management issues, particularly concerning food safety and public health. Regulatory bodies may face challenges in assessing the safety of these new products and determining appropriate labeling requirements. A beneficial aspect of culture meat is its potential to reduce foodborne illnesses associated with traditional meat production, as it can be produced in sterile environments. However, if regulatory measures are not adequately established or enforced, there could be detrimental consequences for consumer trust in lab-grown products. Rigorous testing and transparent communication about safety protocols will be essential to mitigate risks.
D. Innovation Trajectories
The advent of culture meat signifies a transformative innovation trajectory within the food industry. This technology can spur advancements in related fields, including cellular agriculture and bioprocessing techniques. While this trajectory presents opportunities for growth and development, it could also disrupt traditional agricultural practices and threaten livelihoods within farming communities. Striking a balance between embracing innovation and supporting existing agricultural systems will be vital to ensure that both sectors can coexist harmoniously while benefiting from advancements in food production technologies.
E. Economic Justice
Culture meat has the potential to contribute positively to economic justice by providing more affordable protein options for populations that may struggle with access to traditional meat products. If produced at scale, lab-grown meat could lower prices and increase availability for underserved communities. Conversely, there are concerns about economic displacement for traditional farmers and workers in the livestock industry who may lose their livelihoods as consumer preferences shift toward cultured alternatives. To address these issues, policies should be considered that support retraining programs for displaced workers and encourage small-scale farming operations to diversify into sustainable practices.
Controversial Issues Surrounding Culture Meat
Among the various societal and environmental issues associated with culture meat, the question of naturalness may be perceived as the most controversial. Many consumers hold strong beliefs about food authenticity and prefer products that align with traditional farming methods. This issue stems from a deep-rooted cultural connection to food sources that many individuals find difficult to reconcile with lab-grown alternatives. To enhance acceptance of culture meat, transparency in production processes and clear labeling could help consumers understand what they are consuming. Additionally, engaging in public dialogues about the benefits of cultured meat—including its ethical advantages—could foster greater understanding and reduce resistance to this innovative product.
References
– Post, M. J. (2012). Cultured Meat from Stem Cells: Challenges and Prospects. Meat Science, 92(3), 297-301.
– Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011). Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 6117-6123.