Employers require their employees to be conversant with the newest technology. In education, technology has proven itself to be a problem and a solution over time. It is a double-edged sword, as students may benefit from technology in the classroom when it is used for legitimate pedagogical aims. However, students must be supervised carefully to ensure that they are using the technology for approved purposes and not being distracted by it. The problem of the use of cell phones in the classroom is a favorite topic of NCU student essays because it is controversial. Some teachers have found beneficial activities that students can participate in from their phones while others ask students to leave their phones inside backpacks for the duration of the class. There are debates about whether teacher opposition to phones in the classroom stems from the need to maintain order or whether teachers simply do not want to learn new technology. Parents are another set of stakeholders who may either view phones as a necessary safety device or feel that young students do not need phones or do not have the maturity to keep expensive equipment in one piece. Attitudes toward cellphone use in the classroom may also evolve over time.
Something that is not controversial is the need for educational leaders to use technology to improve schools. Interestingly enough, in one article from this week’s reading, principals were concerned about their own technological fluency.
While you are reading the resources, think about how technology and your problem intersect. What solutions to your problem have experts proposed that use technology? Technology is one of those subjects that excites strong feelings; so when you search for your own sources, be wary of articles that seem to be written by technology’s cheerleaders or detractors. An important part of critical thinking is being able to detect bias or logical fallacies. The key words this week are over time” as sometimes opinions about technology change over time from fear to acceptance or from excitement to boredom when the wow factor of a new gadget has worn off.
This paper will present the subject of sustenance weakness and craving in the United States. As per the definition endorsed by the 1996 World Food Summit, "sustenance security exists when… all individuals, consistently, have physical, social and monetary access to adequate, protected and nutritious nourishment which meets their dietary needs and nourishment inclinations for a functioning and solid life".(Simon, 2012, p. 4-5) Food uncertainty in this manner, is the failure to get satisfactory sustenance consumption for all family unit individuals as the aftereffect of inadequate assets. Sustenance Insecurity is likewise the official term used to depict the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) estimation for all the conceivable varieties that a family or house may involvement while getting inadequate to adequate nourishment. The USDA estimates how much good nourishment is accessible and how nutritious that sustenance really is. So while a few individuals from a family may get nourishment more often than not, a portion of the time a few individuals are getting no sustenance, others are getting nourishment that isn't great and in some cases nobody is eating by any stretch of the imagination. Every one of these varieties are considered and estimated. Nourishment unreliable family units are not really sustenance shaky constantly and sustenance frailty may likewise mirror the exchange offs a family unit needs to make between paying the bills and acquiring healthfully sufficient sustenance. ("NYC Food Insecurity," 2014) as anyone might expect, low-pay families will probably encounter sustenance weakness than center or higher salary families. There are four measurements to sustenance security: accessibility, openness, use and soundness. So nourishment weakness happens when there is: an absence of sustenance (no accessibility); an absence of assets (no entrance to nourishment); an ill-advised utilize (no appropriate use of nourishment); or changes in accessibility, availability or usage (no dependability concerning nourishment). (Simon, 2012, p. 5-8) The United States creates more sustenance than it would ever use for household utilization. However regardless of the capacity to deliver this nourishment, sustenance frailty is as yet an issue in the United States. American yearning is the aftereffect of monetary neediness, when a few people actually don't have enough assets to buy nourishment. Be that as it may, levels of pay and destitution don't completely foresee nourishment frailty. This proposes different things, (for example, the capacity to spending assets), are critical in deciding if somebody will be nourishment unreliable. (Gowda, Hadley, and Aiello, 2012, p. 1586) In 2008, 17 million US family units were viewed as sustenance insecure.(Gowda et al., 2012, p. 1579) In 2010, family unit nourishment weakness in the US was at its most elevated amount since estimations started in 1995.(Fram et al., 2011, p. 1114) Also in 2010, more than one-fifth of U.S. youngsters lived in nourishment uncertain homes. The issue was viewed as sufficiently genuine at the time that President Barack Obama freely vowed to end kid hunger by 2015.(Fram et al., 2011, p. 1114) Today, nourishment instability is fought by both government projects and help from the private part. And keeping in mind that the two sorts of help have expanded in this century, hunger alleviation by the legislature has outpaced that given by the private sector.(Gowda et al., 2012, p. 1583) However, this was not generally the situation, and for some individuals all through American history individuals were basically without anyone else. History The possibility of sustenance weakness is a consistent piece of the human condition and in the United States has been a worry for whatever length of time that individuals have been living in North America. The European pioneers who previously settled in North America confronted the possibility of serious yearning a significant part of the time. Transplanting crops brought from Europe and attempting to develop local yields was troublesome. In the beginning of the principal provinces, numerous pioneers watched their harvests come up short and at last passed on of starvation or the impacts of starvation. Be that as it may, numerous different pioneers were spared from starvation through the liberality of Native Americans. After some time the pioneers adjusted and they either duplicated, proceeded or made cultivating techniques that were effective. During the time spent doing this, they found that the land in North America was exceptionally fertile.(Eisinger, 1998, p. 32-34) They were successful to the point that regardless of the rough condition and viciousness, hunger in North America was at that point ending up less serious than the level of craving found all through Western Europe. Enhanced nourishment security had the impact that in spite of the perils of life in the provinces, by 1776 American pilgrims delighted in a higher future than their European cousins. The normal future in North America around then was 51 years; in Great Britain 37 years; in France just 26 years.(Eisinger, 1998, p. 44) A major factor in the sustenance security experienced by North Americans however was that notwithstanding great rich land, there was likewise a low populace level. There was additionally no deficiency of employments. With low joblessness levels and a lot of work, any capable individual was kept from experiencing the impacts related with joblessness, for example, low salary and the subsequent powerlessness to get to food.(Fogel, 2004, p. 14-15) In any case, conditions changed by the mid nineteenth century when great land (or if nothing else access to great land) turned out to be all the more rare, normally accessible just to the individuals who previously had with riches. It had likewise turned out to be harder to bring home the bacon from open land or by owning and working a little homestead. Poor financial conditions constrained numerous little agriculturists off their property, making them destitute. With a developing populace of vagrants, America's first destitute safe houses (which additionally given sustenance), were set up, called Poorhouses.("The Poorhouse," 2012) In a few regions city authorities would likewise "distribute" crisis money to the destitute to purchase nourishment, yet this did not stop the general ascent in neediness or craving. By 1850 living conditions had fallen so low that in America that future had dropped to 43 years. It is imagined that by 1865, upwards of 1 of every 5 Americans could have been experiencing nourishment insecurity.(Fogel, 2004, p. 36) After the Civil War, the modern unrest started to change this circumstance somewhat. Industrial facility occupations given more access to salary to specialists and by the 1870's there was less craving and vagrancy in the U.S. Obviously the greater part of these occupations were low wage and specialists endured in horrendous conditions, however there were more employments to look over (and subsequently less joblessness) so that at any rate individuals could procure enough cash to eat. In spite of the fact that these "sweat shops" with their terrible working conditions were the motor driving the "Overlaid Age" the general outcome was that they enhanced economy. This thusly made much more (and better) occupations being made outside of the processing plants as shoppers had more cash to spend. One reaction be that as it may, was that life for the poorest of the poor really deteriorated. Numerous rich Americans restricted the possibility of government interceding to help the ravenous, figuring this would just make masses of languid jobless individuals. They additionally felt that it would by one way or another damage the development of the free market. Free enterprise private enterprise was believed to be the suitable reaction to the destitute poor. And yet, the private division started to give assistance to the poor by making America's first soup kitchens.(DePastino, 2005, p. 22) In the mid twentieth century there was an upheaval in cultivating with the making of the main techniques for motorized agriculture.(Janick, 2014) Ironically, in spite of the fact that this prompt an expansion in provincial joblessness it likewise made an excess of sustenance which helped bring down nourishment costs in the United States. Subsequently, amid and after the main World War (1914-1918), the United States sent around 20 million tons of sustenance to a war desolated Europe. Also, since World War I the United States has kept on being a world pioneer for alleviating hunger.(Vernon, 2007, p. 242) In the 1920's America's economy was blasting, yet money markets crash of 1929 and the Great Depression that pursued turned around a significant part of the advancement that the United States had made in decreasing residential craving. Be that as it may, because of the Great Depression, the issue of American yearning turned into a noteworthy issue for the administration. In time both the administration and the private area reacted to the requirements of the American individuals. More private soup kitchens and bread lines were opened and the "New Deal" program of government help was propelled. Some administration programs like the Works Progress Administration (or WPA) endeavored to diminish joblessness by giving truly necessary employments. Different projects attempted to diminish destitution by raising wages. Another administration program, the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation attempted to furnish destitute individuals with sustenance and purchased surplus nourishment from agriculturists. By the 1940's the New Deal programs had enhanced the economy and appeared to have lessened a large portion of the craving in the United States. Until the late 1960s, numerous Americans viewed hunger in their country as a settled problem.(Poppendieck, 1999, p. 11) So much with the goal that a few states even finished the act of disseminating government nourishment surpluses for nothing. Rather they gave an early type of sustenance stamps yet there was a cost charged and since many couldn't pay for them, more individuals started to experience the ill effects of serious craving again.(Poppendieck, 1999, p. 10) As American culture rediscovered hunger, more private philanthropy bunches opened soup kitchens and the principal present day sustenance bank was made in 1967.(Poppendieck, 1999, p. 112) The purported "Appetite Lobby" was additionally propelled to request of legislators to enhance welfare for the hungry. By 1967 senate hearings were hung on appetite and in 1969 President Nixon approached Congress to end hunger in the U.S. once and for all.(Melnick, 1994, p. 311) During the 1970s, U.S. government hunger help developed considerably with sustenance stamps dispersed complimentary. Despite the fact that these endeavors again helped battle sustenance uncertainty, in the end the government>GET ANSWER