DHS Strategic Plan

  Review again the DHS Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2020-2024. Based on what you have learned over the term, provide an analysis of the plan by listing and commenting on three "ups" (positive features) and three "downs" (things that should be improved upon) of the plan. Please make a note of changes to your positives and improvements and why you changed your responses from Week 1. https://www.fema.gov/about/strategic-plan
Genghis Khan was a master of the siege The Field Museum declared. He would send scouts out to find out the time that resources and food would be moved, and to look at the guard positioning. This let him know more about their opponents than they know about them. He would cut off supplies to the city so they can’t get new gear. He would starve them and then when they are weak he would attack and take the city. He was able to surprise the defenders by the distance the Mongols could travel in a short time. The Mongols were able to travel very fast on horseback and were able to strike more fear into their opponents like that. He also had men go into the city two or three days before the siege to get prepared to attack from the inside. This was a great idea because it is a two-pronged strategy. An attack from the outside and an attack from the inside too. He used lighting to make his army look bigger to strike fear into his opponents. He used this to make their opponents afraid and when someone is afraid they can’t think straight and they will make a choice that will cost them the city. Fear is a great weapon in war and it is still used today Psychological Warfare suggested. Genghis Khan was a master of putting fear into the hearts of his opponents and his own men. This fear made his men work harder because they were afraid of him. He also used fear to unite the Mongol tribes under his rule. Before the siege he wants his opponents to know he is coming because they will hesitate and will not be able to fight with a clear mind. Fighting with a clouded mind is very difficult because you can’t think straight, you will make a mistake, or you will do both. He used lighting to make his enemies be afraid because it made the Mongol army look almost three times as larger than it really is. This let him put fear into his enemy’s minds at night which would result in a lack of sleep and their brain won’t be able to work fast and would not be able to react to something as fast as they would normally. Genghis Khan burned whole towns because he wanted his enemies to know his strength and that would make his opponents fear him. Whoever controls the fear in a battle has more control than your enemy’s do.
 
 
The Mongols were masters of the horse archer tactic, and the warriors and legends site gave many examples of why. Before Genghis Khan, the horse archer tactic was used for hunting because on a horse they were able to keep up with the running animals. The Mongols were once a bunch of nomadic tribes and hunting was a huge part of their lives. They adapted to their living conditions by using horses. The Mongols were able to control the horse with their feet and shoot with their bows in hand. This was an effective tactic in a are because the Mongols were always in motion, so their enemies would have a hard time hitting them and the

Sample Solution

Ups: 1. Comprehensive Approach: The plan outlines a comprehensive approach to addressing the issues faced by communities across the United States, looking at multiple facets of these problems such as economic security and justice system reform in order to create effective solutions. 2. Focus on Vulnerable Populations: A central focus of this strategy is on providing support for vulnerable populations such as veterans, seniors, and those affected by disasters or public health emergencies – allowing them better access to services they may not otherwise have available. 3. Strong Partnerships: The plan highlights strong partnerships between local agencies and other stakeholders like non-profits, faith-based organizations, universities, businesses etc., making it easier for initiatives to be effectively implemented with greater participation from all involved parties. Downs: 1. Lack of Budget Security: Despite mentioning plans for longterm financial sustainability within the discussion document there is no guarantee that funding will remain consistent over time; meaning programs must find alternative means of support or risk being cut due to budget constraints or political changes beyond their control. 2. Limited Community Participation Opportunities: Although some external community involvement is mentioned throughout the strategy document there are limited actual details provided regarding how citizens can get involved in practical ways beyond spreading awareness about DHS initiatives – leaving little room for meaningful engagement with disadvantaged individuals who could benefit most from their work. 3. Inadequate Oversight Measures :Finally while monitoring & evaluation processes are briefly discussed in terms of progress tracking more specific steps should be taken concerning evaluation criteria used when assessing effectiveness so as ensure implementation standards are being met during every phase of operations!