Discuss the differences between Evidence Based Practice and Practice Based Evidence.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Solution
Evidence-based practice (EBP) and practice-based evidence (PBE) are two approaches to healthcare that focus on the use of scientific evidence in decision making. Both models involve the gathering, assessing, and synthesizing of available data to guide medical decisions. While similar in their overall goals, they differ in their approach to creating a course of action
Sample Solution
Evidence-based practice (EBP) and practice-based evidence (PBE) are two approaches to healthcare that focus on the use of scientific evidence in decision making. Both models involve the gathering, assessing, and synthesizing of available data to guide medical decisions. While similar in their overall goals, they differ in their approach to creating a course of action
EBP is an evidence-driven method of care that relies upon research-based clinical guidelines and protocols. It seeks to optimize patient outcomes by focusing on best practices from both current literature and past experiences. The process begins with establishing clear objectives for treatment then proceeding through analysis implementation evaluation steps necessary achieve desired results . This allows practitioners prioritize most effective strategies based scientific knowledge thus promoting quality care health outcome improvement times.
On other hand PBE focuses more “bottom up” approach seeing treatments less structured way than EBP Instead collecting facts information related particular situation having empirical basis like EBP it takes account real world experience anecdotal stories what works well within context question order formulate response In essence this form inquiry looks individualized solutions specific circumstances which lack any sort pre-defined parameters rather allow creative thinking potential novel solutions arise out collective wisdom accumulated over years direct interactions patients – all while taking into consideration latest applicable research findings ensure safety efficacy end product.
Both methods have their respective advantages disadvantages which should taken into consideration when constructing plan action Considering Evidence Based Practice relies heavily existing literature data may not always be ideal fit ever changing nature medicine where new developments can quickly render certain information obsolete Furthermore due rigidity structure means there some room flexibility interpretation tailored personal needs being met On flip side Practice Based Evidence provides great freedom come up unique customized solutions but brings risk unintended consequences associated its more loose framework ultimately resulting generally lower rates effectiveness compared former .
