Direct-To-Consumer Advertising

After reviewing Module 4: Lecture Materials & Resources https://stu.instructure.com/courses/34579/pages/module-4-lecture-materials-and-resources, discuss the following: Respond to the Case Study presented in Chapter 12 (p. 286) about direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. What impact have you observed in the populations you serve in your nursing practice? Comment on the ethics of this practice, in terms of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.    
Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs is a controversial practice that has been the subject of much debate. Supporters of DTCA argue that it allows patients to become more informed about their health and treatment options, and that it can empower patients to take a more active role in their own care. Opponents of DTCA argue that it can lead to over-prescribing, drug misuse, and financial hardship for patients. The case study presented in Chapter 12 of the textbook provides a good example of the potential risks of DTCA. In the case study, a patient sees a television advertisement for a new prescription drug for the treatment of anxiety. The advertisement makes the drug sound very effective, and the patient asks her doctor to prescribe it. The doctor agrees, even though the patient does not have a clear diagnosis of anxiety. The patient takes the drug, but she experiences side effects that are worse than her original anxiety symptoms. She stops taking the drug, but she is left with a financial burden from the prescription. In my nursing practice, I have observed that DTCA can have a number of negative impacts on patients. First, DTCA can lead to patients demanding medications that they do not need. This can put patients at risk of over-prescribing, drug misuse, and financial hardship. Second, DTCA can create unrealistic expectations about the effectiveness of prescription drugs. This can lead to patients being disappointed when their symptoms do not improve as much as they had hoped. Third, DTCA can create confusion about the risks and benefits of prescription drugs. This can make it difficult for patients to make informed decisions about their treatment. In terms of the ethics of DTCA, there are a number of concerns. First, DTCA can violate the principle of autonomy by pressuring patients to make decisions about their treatment that are not in their best interests. Second, DTCA can violate the principle of beneficence by exposing patients to unnecessary risks. Third, DTCA can violate the principle of non-maleficence by causing patients harm. Fourth, DTCA can violate the principle of justice by disproportionately benefiting wealthy patients who are able to afford the advertised medications. In conclusion, DTCA is a controversial practice with a number of potential risks. It is important for nurses to be aware of these risks and to educate patients about the potential benefits and risks of prescription drugs before they make a decision about treatment. Here are some additional thoughts on the ethics of DTCA:
  • Autonomy: DTCA can be seen as a violation of patient autonomy because it can pressure patients to make decisions about their treatment that are not in their best interests. For example, a patient who sees a television advertisement for a new prescription drug for the treatment of anxiety may feel pressured to ask their doctor for the drug, even if they do not have a clear diagnosis of anxiety.
  • Beneficence: DTCA can be seen as a violation of the principle of beneficence because it can expose patients to unnecessary risks. For example, a patient who takes a prescription drug after seeing a television advertisement may not be aware of the full risks of the drug, such as side effects or drug interactions.
  • Non-maleficence: DTCA can be seen as a violation of the principle of non-maleficence because it can cause patients harm. For example, a patient who takes a prescription drug after seeing a television advertisement may experience side effects that are worse than their original symptoms.
  • Justice: DTCA can be seen as a violation of the principle of justice because it can disproportionately benefit wealthy patients who are able to afford the advertised medications. For example, a patient who sees a television advertisement for a new prescription drug for the treatment of a rare disease may not be able to afford the drug, even if it is the best treatment option for their condition.
Overall, DTCA is a complex issue with a number of ethical implications. It is important to consider all of these implications before making a decision about whether or not to support DTCA.    

Sample Solution

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs is a controversial practice that has been the subject of much debate.