In this assignment, you will experience a simulated disaster, and provide a report on what each CIKR stakeholder will need to do in order to return to steady state. You will state what laws, regulations, and standards apply to that steady-state plan, and what actions, if any, they will take in the future to mitigate against an event like this. The disaster simulation is interactive, so your situation will be different than others, affecting the actions that your CIKR stakeholders will need to take.
Click here to access the: DISASTER SIMULATION https://myclassroom.apus.edu/shared/commonfolder/security-and-global-studies-common/EDMG/EDMG230/Simulation/EDMG230-Simulation.html
Assume that the event has happened in your US state of choice, and that you are providing this report after the end of the scenario after the governor has arrived with aid and the FBI has completed their investigation.
The CIKR stakeholders that you must provide a report on are:
• Hospital CEO
• EMS Ambulance team
• Fire Department
• Police Department
• Funeral Directors
• University Police
Each CIKR must provide:
• Plan to return to steady state
• What laws, regulations, and standards on the local, State, and Federal levels apply to their situation
• What actions, if any, the CIKR will take to mitigate against this type of event in the future
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Disaster Simulation Report: Returning to Steady State for CIKR Stakeholders
Introduction
In the aftermath of the simulated disaster that occurred in my chosen US state, this report will outline the actions that each Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR) stakeholder should take to return to steady state. The CIKR stakeholders include the Hospital CEO, EMS Ambulance team, Fire Department, Police Department, Funeral Directors, and University Police. Additionally, the report will identify the relevant laws, regulations, and standards that apply to each stakeholder’s situation and suggest mitigation actions to prevent future events of this nature.
Hospital CEO
Plan to Return to Steady State: The Hospital CEO should prioritize the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess the damage and identify areas requiring immediate attention, such as restoring essential utilities and repairing structural damage.
Coordinate with local authorities and emergency management agencies to ensure a smooth transition back to normal operations.
Develop a comprehensive recovery plan that addresses staffing needs, patient care, equipment replacement, and communication protocols.
Collaborate with other healthcare facilities to redistribute patients and ensure continuity of care.
Evaluate and enhance emergency preparedness plans to better respond to future disasters.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with building codes, health regulations, and zoning ordinances.
State: Adherence to state licensing requirements for healthcare facilities and regulations related to patient safety and emergency response.
Federal: Compliance with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) for patient care during emergencies.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Regularly review and update emergency response plans based on lessons learned from the disaster simulation.
Conduct drills and training exercises to improve staff readiness in emergency situations.
Enhance coordination with local authorities and neighboring healthcare facilities to optimize resource sharing during crises.
Invest in infrastructure improvements and backup systems to ensure uninterrupted operations during disasters.
EMS Ambulance Team
Plan to Return to Steady State: The EMS Ambulance team should focus on the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess the condition of ambulances, medical equipment, and supplies, ensuring they are operational and adequately stocked.
Coordinate with the Hospital CEO and other emergency response agencies to reallocate resources as needed.
Establish communication channels for seamless coordination with hospitals, fire departments, and police departments.
Review and update protocols for triage, patient transport, and communication during emergencies.
Conduct debriefing sessions with team members to identify areas for improvement in response procedures.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with traffic laws and regulations related to emergency vehicle operation.
State: Adherence to state licensing requirements for emergency medical services.
Federal: Compliance with the Emergency Medical Services Systems Act (EMSSA), which provides guidelines for the effective delivery of pre-hospital emergency medical care.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Enhance training programs for EMS personnel to improve their ability to respond effectively during disasters.
Strengthen partnerships with local hospitals, fire departments, and police departments through joint training exercises and drills.
Invest in technology upgrades, such as GPS tracking systems and real-time communication tools, to enhance response capabilities.
Regularly review and update protocols based on lessons learned from the simulated disaster.
Fire Department
Plan to Return to Steady State: The Fire Department should prioritize the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess damages to fire stations, equipment, and vehicles, ensuring they are repaired or replaced as necessary.
Conduct safety inspections of affected areas to identify potential hazards or structural weaknesses.
Collaborate with other emergency response agencies to ensure efficient resource allocation and coordination.
Review and update mutual aid agreements with neighboring fire departments for enhanced support during future incidents.
Conduct post-incident analysis to identify areas for improvement in response procedures.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with local fire codes, building regulations, and zoning ordinances.
State: Adherence to state fire safety regulations and licensing requirements for firefighters.
Federal: Compliance with federal regulations related to hazardous materials management and firefighter safety.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Enhance training programs for firefighters in specialized areas such as hazardous materials response and urban search and rescue.
Collaborate with local communities in promoting fire safety education and prevention campaigns.
Invest in advanced firefighting equipment and technologies to improve response capabilities.
Regularly review and update standard operating procedures based on lessons learned from the disaster simulation.
Police Department
Plan to Return to Steady State: The Police Department should focus on the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess damages to police stations, vehicles, and equipment, ensuring they are repaired or replaced as necessary.
Reestablish law enforcement presence in affected areas and ensure public safety through increased patrols.
Collaborate with other emergency response agencies to share information and resources efficiently.
Review and update emergency response protocols for managing civil unrest or social disturbances that may arise due to the disaster.
Conduct debriefing sessions with officers to identify areas for improvement in coordinating response efforts.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with local laws related to law enforcement operations, traffic enforcement, and public safety.
State: Adherence to state laws governing police practices, including use of force policies and evidence handling procedures.
Federal: Compliance with federal laws related to civil rights, jurisdictional boundaries, and emergency response coordination.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Enhance community policing initiatives by fostering stronger relationships between officers and community members.
Provide ongoing training on de-escalation techniques, cultural sensitivity, and crisis intervention strategies.
Invest in technology upgrades for improved communication and data sharing among officers during emergencies.
Regularly review and update policies based on lessons learned from the simulated disaster.
Funeral Directors
Plan to Return to Steady State: Funeral Directors should prioritize the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess damages to funeral homes or facilities and make necessary repairs or alternative arrangements for services.
Coordinate with families impacted by the disaster to reschedule or relocate funeral services as needed.
Collaborate with local authorities and health departments regarding any legal requirements or health safety measures related to handling deceased individuals affected by the disaster.
Provide grief counseling services or resources for affected families in collaboration with mental health professionals.
Review and update disaster preparedness plans specific to funeral homes.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with local laws related to funeral home operations, handling of deceased individuals, burial or cremation permits, and health safety measures.
State: Adherence to state licensing requirements for funeral directors and regulations related to funeral practices.
Federal: Compliance with federal regulations related to handling deceased individuals during emergencies.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Establish partnerships with local emergency management agencies or healthcare facilities for improved coordination during disaster situations affecting funeral services.
Regularly review and update disaster preparedness plans based on lessons learned from the simulated event.
Enhance communication channels with affected families through digital platforms or alternative methods during emergencies that may disrupt traditional funeral services.
Provide ongoing training for funeral directors on grief counseling techniques and trauma-informed care.
University Police
Plan to Return to Steady State: The University Police should focus on the following actions to return to steady state:
Assess damages to campus facilities, security systems, equipment, and vehicles used by university police officers. Repair or replace them as necessary.
Reinstate campus security measures, including access control systems, surveillance cameras, and patrols in affected areas.
Update emergency communication protocols with students, faculty, staff, and other relevant stakeholders regarding campus safety measures after the incident.
Collaborate with local law enforcement agencies for enhanced coordination in emergency response efforts.
Conduct post-incident reviews of security procedures with university administrators to identify areas for improvement.
Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Standards:
Local: Compliance with local laws related to campus security operations, traffic enforcement within campus premises, crime reporting requirements, etc.
State: Adherence to state laws governing university police departments’ authority, jurisdictional boundaries, arrest powers, etc.
Federal: Compliance with federal laws related to campus safety reporting (Clery Act), civil rights (Title IX), etc.
Mitigation Actions for the Future:
Enhance training programs for university police officers on emergency response procedures specific to campus environments.
Strengthen partnerships with local law enforcement agencies through joint training exercises, information sharing agreements, or mutual aid agreements.
Implement technology solutions such as mass notification systems or mobile safety applications for improved communication during emergencies.
Regularly review and update campus security policies based on lessons learned from the simulated disaster.
Conclusion
Returning CIKR stakeholders to steady state after a simulated disaster requires a coordinated effort from each entity involved. By formulating comprehensive plans that address immediate recovery needs while considering relevant laws/regulations/standards at different levels (local/state/federal), CIKR stakeholders can effectively overcome challenges posed by such events. Furthermore, taking proactive measures to mitigate against future disasters is crucial. Continuous improvement through training programs, infrastructure updates, collaboration with relevant agencies/organizations, regular policy reviews/upgrades based on lessons learned are key steps towards enhancing resilience within each CIKR sector.
