Step 1: Select the Organization

Select a UAE-based organization focused on a distributive justice issue. This means that your organization should focus on a social justice issue (e.g., access to education, clean water, and health services). You may select a (1) volunteer organization, (2) a non-profit organization, OR (3) a public-service organization in the UAE whose work focuses on some distributive justice topic.

Some examples include but are not limited to, are:

Emirates Down Syndrome Association (EDSA)
A non-profit organization based in the UAE that supports and empowers individuals with Down Syndrome and their families.
Dubai Cares
A non-profit organization that works to improve access to quality education in developing countries. Their work includes building schools, providing teacher training, and supporting innovative education programs that promote equity and social justice.
Emirates Foundation
A non-profit organization that works to empower youth and promote social entrepreneurship in the UAE
Gulf for Good
A charity organization that organizes adventure challenges and expeditions to raise funds for various social causes.
Thrift for Good
A thrift shop that aims to reduce clothing waste and help children, in partnership with Gulf for Good.
Senses Residential and Day Care for Special Needs
The first residential care facility in the Middle East that provides people of determination 24/7 care.
Step 2: Organization Overview

Once you have selected your organization, introduce it and apply #SystemAnalysis to describe the organization and its operations clearly. Identify the distributive justice issue the organization aims to address with a precise application of #Purpose. In relation to its #Purpose, explain how the organization addresses an issue and its decisions and actions. You may consider using media sources, which must be cited, to provide an example of the organization’s activities.

Step 3: Assessment of Frameworks #EthicalConsiderations

Using your classroom materials, identify the #EthicalConsiderations by understanding the actions of your selected organization through at least two ethical frameworks. You must select ethical frameworks covered in this course to understand your selected social justice issue.

Identify the ethical dilemma that your organization is concerned with. Interpret the issue through the different ethical frameworks. If your organization is clearly using an ethical framework, clearly state and explain that. Then, compare it to another framework. If it is unclear which framework the organization is using, present the issue through the two or more ethical frameworks you see suitable. As you consider each ethical framework, use your knowledge of #SystemAnalysis to help you identify ethical conflicts, effects, tensions, and implications that may arise when addressing the social justice issue.

Step 4: Stance and Defense #EthicalJudgment

After considering the different frameworks, decide which ethical framework should be followed by weighing the relevant ethical considerations in light of the situation. Exercise your ethical judgment by defending your considered position by considering and addressing alternatives and counter-arguments and identifying courses of action that best advance that position in the given circumstances.

Step 5: Conclusion

In this section, you will briefly summarize the key points made in this assignment. Note that you should also go beyond merely summarizing what you previously said. Reflect on the information that you have acquired and come to new conclusions based on that information.

For instance:

Does the organization’s ability to solve its issue (or not) tell us something else about the complex system (e.g., city, emirate, society) that it is embedded in?
Do you think the organization could act in different ways? What would better solve the issue and resolve the ethical conflicts and issues it faces?
Are there any barriers or challenges that the organization faces when attempting to address this distributive justice issue, and how can these be overcome?
Step 6: APA-Style #Professionalism

A reference page formatted in APA style.

Ideas and examples summarized or paraphrased from other authors must be appropriately cited. Do not use quotes in this assignment.
If you have any questions about APA style and referencing, refer to this resource.
Please note that you should adhere to APA Style & Format throughout your paper. This includes but is not limited to one space between sentences, indenting paragraphs, and utilizing leveled headings.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

 

Research on Dubai Cares as an Organization Addressing Distributive Justice Issues in the UAE

Introduction

Dubai Cares is a prominent non-profit organization based in the UAE that focuses on improving access to quality education in developing countries. Through various initiatives such as building schools, providing teacher training, and supporting innovative education programs, Dubai Cares aims to promote equity and social justice. This essay will delve into the organization’s operations and its efforts to address distributive justice issues in the realm of education.

Organization Overview

Dubai Cares was established with the vision of ensuring that children, especially those in developing nations, have access to quality education. The organization recognizes that education is a fundamental right and a key driver for sustainable development. By building schools, providing educational resources, and implementing programs that enhance the quality of education, Dubai Cares strives to create a more equitable world where all children have the opportunity to learn and thrive.

One example of Dubai Cares’ impactful work is its initiative to support girls’ education in underprivileged communities. By addressing gender disparities in education, the organization is not only promoting distributive justice but also gender equality. Through partnerships with local stakeholders and strategic investments in education infrastructure, Dubai Cares is making a tangible difference in the lives of marginalized communities.

Assessment of Frameworks – Ethical Considerations

In analyzing Dubai Cares through ethical frameworks, two pertinent perspectives emerge. Firstly, the Utilitarian framework emphasizes maximizing overall happiness or utility. From this viewpoint, Dubai Cares’ focus on education can be seen as a means to uplift entire communities, breaking the cycle of poverty and fostering societal well-being.

On the other hand, the Rights-based framework underscores the importance of respecting individuals’ rights, including the right to education. By ensuring that children have access to quality schooling, Dubai Cares aligns with this ethical perspective by upholding fundamental human rights.

Stance and Defense – Ethical Judgment

Considering the ethical frameworks presented, a balanced approach that integrates both Utilitarian and Rights-based perspectives seems most appropriate for Dubai Cares. While maximizing utility through education programs is crucial, it is equally essential to respect and uphold the rights of individuals to access education. By harmonizing these principles, Dubai Cares can maximize its impact while ensuring ethical integrity in its endeavors.

Conclusion

Dubai Cares’ commitment to promoting distributive justice through education sheds light on the systemic inequalities prevalent in many societies. The organization’s ability to address these issues not only reflects its dedication but also underscores the interconnectedness of social justice and sustainable development. Moving forward, Dubai Cares can further enhance its impact by continuously assessing and adapting its strategies to overcome barriers and challenges in achieving educational equity.

APA-Style Professionalism

References:

Dubai Cares. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.dubaicares.ae/en/about-us/

Please ensure proper APA-style formatting for all references cited in this essay.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer