Read the following chapter in your text, Applied Behavior Analysis (Cooper et al., 2020):

Chapter 1: “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis”
Please read the following chapters in your text, The New Behaviorism: Foundations of behavioral science (Staddon, 2021):

Chapter 1
Chapter 2
The 2 following articles are uploaded files.
“The History of Behavior Analysis: Some Historiography and a Bibliography” (Morris et al., 1990)

“Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It” (Watson, 1994)

Video below was given:
https://youtu.be/FcXD4SXkzB4 Citation (Howard, 2020)

Early Historical Development of Applied Behavior Analysis

In 1913, John B. Watson was the first American psychologist to call himself a “behaviorist.” From 1913 to 1974, a series of events and developments took place that helped to shape and contribute to the current approach to practice in applied behavior analysis. For this discussion, please review the assigned readings and the video in this unit.

Please respond to the following:

What approaches were used to understand and study behavior prior to the introduction of behaviorism?
What was John B. Watson’s rationale for focusing on observable behavior and the environment rather than internal events?
What were some important events and developments in behaviorism from Watson’s (1913) declaration of the importance of a behavioral approach through Skinner’s (1974) development of radical behaviorism? Be sure to refer to the important historical figures that drove these developments in applied behavior analysis.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Early Historical Development of Applied Behavior Analysis

Introduction

The field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) has a rich history that has shaped its current approach to understanding and studying behavior. Prior to the introduction of behaviorism, various approaches were used to understand and study behavior. However, it was John B. Watson who revolutionized the field by emphasizing observable behavior and the environment over internal events. This essay will discuss the approaches used before behaviorism, Watson’s rationale for focusing on observable behavior, and important events and developments in behaviorism from Watson’s declaration to Skinner’s development of radical behaviorism.

Approaches Prior to Behaviorism

Before the emergence of behaviorism, several approaches were used to understand and study behavior. These approaches focused on different aspects of behavior, such as introspection and mental processes. Some of the prominent approaches include:

Introspection: Introspection was a method used by psychologists to study behavior by analyzing one’s own thoughts and feelings. This approach relied on self-reporting and subjective experiences.

Structuralism: Structuralism, proposed by Wilhelm Wundt, aimed to analyze the structure of consciousness through introspection. It focused on identifying the basic elements of conscious experience.

Functionalism: Functionalism, advocated by William James, shifted the focus from the structure of consciousness to the functions of mental processes in adapting to the environment.

Gestalt psychology: Gestalt psychology, led by Max Wertheimer, emphasized the importance of studying whole patterns and perceptions rather than isolated elements. It focused on how people organize and perceive information.

These approaches provided valuable insights into understanding human behavior but lacked a systematic and empirical approach that would later be introduced by behaviorism.

Watson’s Rationale for Observable Behavior

John B. Watson, the founder of behaviorism, had a strong rationale for focusing on observable behavior and the environment rather than internal events. Watson believed that psychology should be a science based on objective observation and measurement. He argued that studying internal events such as thoughts and emotions was subjective and could not be directly observed or measured.

Watson believed that by focusing on observable behavior, psychologists could develop a more scientific and objective understanding of human behavior. He proposed that behavior is influenced by external factors such as stimuli in the environment, and these factors can be objectively studied and manipulated.

Watson’s emphasis on observable behavior paved the way for a more rigorous and scientific approach to studying behavior, which would later be expanded upon by other influential figures in the field.

Important Events and Developments in Behaviorism

The period from Watson’s declaration in 1913 to Skinner’s development of radical behaviorism in 1974 witnessed several important events and developments in behaviorism. These events were driven by key historical figures who contributed to the growth of applied behavior analysis. Some significant milestones include:

Ivan Pavlov: Ivan Pavlov’s experiments on classical conditioning laid the foundation for behaviorism. His studies with dogs demonstrated how behaviors could be conditioned through associations between stimuli and responses.

B.F. Skinner: B.F. Skinner further advanced the field of behaviorism with his work on operant conditioning. He introduced the concept of reinforcement, which showed how behaviors could be strengthened or weakened based on their consequences.

Clark L. Hull: Clark L. Hull developed a comprehensive theory of behavior that integrated principles from Pavlovian and operant conditioning. His work emphasized the importance of mathematical models in understanding behavior.

Neal Miller: Neal Miller expanded upon Skinner’s work and explored the physiological processes underlying behavior. He conducted groundbreaking research on biofeedback and showed that internal physiological responses could be influenced by external cues.

These historical figures, along with others, played instrumental roles in shaping the field of applied behavior analysis. They contributed to our understanding of how behavior is influenced by environmental factors and provided practical applications for behavior change.

Conclusion

The early historical development of applied behavior analysis was marked by a shift from introspection and mental processes to an emphasis on observable behavior and the environment. John B. Watson’s rationale for focusing on observable behavior laid the foundation for a more scientific approach to studying behavior. Important events and developments driven by historical figures such as Pavlov, Skinner, Hull, and Miller further advanced the field of applied behavior analysis, providing valuable insights into how behaviors are learned and changed. Today, ABA continues to be a powerful tool for promoting positive behavioral outcomes in various fields, including education, therapy, and organizational management.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer