Educators should understand the learning and behavioral characteristics of students with moderate to severe disabilities
Summary: Responding to Diverse Learning Needs in Inclusive Environments
Understanding the typical and atypical development of K-8 students is an indispensable tool for all educators when responding to the learning and behavioral needs of students with moderate to severe disabilities. By comparing the developmental trajectories, educators gain insight into the specific areas where students with significant disabilities may require additional support and specialized instruction. For instance, knowing that typical cognitive development progresses towards abstract thinking highlights the need for concrete, hands-on learning experiences and visual supports for students with moderate to severe disabilities, who often learn best with direct manipulation and real-world examples. Similarly, recognizing typical linguistic milestones, such as reciprocal conversations and complex sentence structures, underscores the importance of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems and highly structured communication opportunities for students whose verbal language development is significantly delayed. This comparative understanding allows educators to set individualized, yet ambitious, goals that are rooted in developmental realities while still striving for optimal progress.
Furthermore, this knowledge forms the bedrock for effective collaboration between special educators, general educators, and related service providers (such as speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, and behavior specialists). When all team members understand the unique cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional characteristics of students with moderate to severe disabilities, they can collectively create safe, inclusive, and culturally responsive learning environments. General educators, supported by special educators, can adapt classroom materials and activities to accommodate diverse learning styles and paces, ensuring meaningful participation. For example, a general education teacher might use a visual schedule (a common support for students with moderate to severe disabilities) for the entire class during transitions, benefiting all students while specifically supporting those who rely on visual cues. Related service providers can integrate their therapeutic goals into academic and social contexts, rather than isolating skills. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of belonging and ensures that the curriculum and social interactions are not only accessible but also genuinely engaging, promoting positive peer relationships and functional skill acquisition in a holistic manner. By aligning their efforts around a shared understanding of student characteristics, educators can intentionally design environments where every student, regardless of disability, feels valued, safe, and empowered to learn and interact meaningfully within their community.
Scholarly Resources:
- Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakeman, S. Y. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching literacy to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 269-291.
- Friend, M. (2018). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals (5th ed.). Pearson.
- National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. National Academies Press. (While focused on high schools, its foundational insights on cognitive development and learning principles are broadly applicable).
Educators recognize that every student brings unique strengths and needs to the classroom. For students with moderate to severe disabilities, understanding their specific learning and behavioral characteristics is paramount to providing effective direct services and supports. This knowledge not only informs individualized instruction but also empowers teachers to collaborate effectively with general educators and other professionals, ensuring that all learning activities and social interactions are meaningful and conducive to progress. By considering individual abilities and related factors, educators can select, develop, and adapt experiences that truly foster growth for these students.
Here is a matrix comparing typical and atypical cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development in K-8 students across different profiles: