Provide an analysis, examples and evaluation of power use as described below.
Define and describe the concept of “hard power” and the three types of this kind of power. Identify a work situation for each of these three types of power in which the use of “hard power” (coercive, reward, legitimate) might be appropriate. For each situation:
Identify and define the type of hard power used.
Provide rationale for why the use of hard power is appropriate.
Define and describe the concept of “soft power” and the two types of this kind of power. Identify a work situation for each of these two types of power in which “soft power” (expert, referent) might be appropriate. For each situation:
Identify and define the type of soft power used.
Provide rationale for why the use of soft power is appropriate.
herefore, at the center of our national narrative is not a single understanding of what it means to be a member of the polity, but rather there are competing narratives of woven together into unique patterns, generating sites of competing interpretation. These stock stories, to use Balkin’s and Levinson’s language, “are both descriptive and prescriptive: they not only frame our sense of what has happened and how events will unfold in the future,” but also explain how those events should unfold and why. To provide some examples of stock stories used in American culture, the “idea of America,” which typically arises at the center of the American narrative, begins in earnest at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the Revolutionary War from Britain, and the United States Constitution, which distills America’s sense of self to legal ideals that have gathered an almost religious aura. However, there are stock stories about Americans fleeing religious persecution and settling in the New World, American’s pushing West, conquering the wild frontier, Americans seeking liberty, about America being an exceptional country never possessing a hierarchical social class akin to those in Europe. At different points in America’s history, these stock stories have taken on different interpretations when used by competing groups. Different actors weigh in as the nation’s parties shape and define concepts, establishing firmer boundaries on elements of their narratives. Stories are as “central to constitutional interpretation as any jurist,” given their role in creating the constitutional expectations that inform the populace at large. To understand the influence and interplay of narrative within the thematic elements of national discussion, it is not necessary to believe that people read the text of judicial opinions, pore over the contents of founding documents, or that people are aware of their appeal to narratives in the arguments they m>GET ANSWER