Respond to each question in 2-5 sentences. Integrate source material from course readings into your responses and cite these. Please number each response so that I know to which question you are responding.
What does it reveal about Egyptian society and culture for its architects to design pyramids of such enormity and precision?
What is the role of religion in ancient Egyptian culture? How did you come to this conclusion?
Choose two pieces of Egyptian art from this time period and embed or attach images. Discuss the significance(s) of these images to the culture.
Choose one or two artifacts from this module and discuss the role of women in the cultures/cultural artifacts.
In Gilgamesh, what does the story of Enkidu’s education by the priestess (called a prostitute by some translators) tell us about Mesopotamian views of culture and civilization?
Why is Gilgamesh an important text? What is its historical significance? How is it relevant today? What lessons does it teach? Discuss specific details from the story. How is the text very culturally divergent?
Cast Gilgamesh with Hollywood actors as though you were producing a film about the story. Who would cast as which character and why?
Pretend that the Persians had enjoyed consistent success in their conflicts with the Greeks. How would Western Civilization be different today?
Read a piece of history by Herodotus. Discuss two points you wish to analyze and/or evaluate in this history. Why are Herodotus’s contributions significant?
Name and discuss the two major themes (two specific themes for each of these two works for a total of four themes) of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey. Refer to specific episodes from both epics. This will require a reading of the texts or summaries or overviews of these two epics.
Describe the role of the gods of Olympus in ancient Greek culture. What does this view of deities reflect about the Greek cultures of this time period?
Which Greek god or goddess would you choose to be and why?
What poem of Sappho do you find most interesting? Why? Refer to specific lines from the poem. Analyze specific language in the poem.
In their article 'Welfare Safety Net or Tenure of Choice? The Dilemma Facing Social Housing Policy In England', Fitzpatrick and Pawson (2007) clarify and think about the changing condition of social lodging in England. This exposition will give a rundown of the article before breaking down the situation of social lodging in Scotland contrasted with that portrayed in England. Key similitudes and contrasts between the two nations concerning social lodging will be given confirmation from the present writing. At long last, the conclusion will endeavor to evaluate if the places of social lodging are extremely that distinctive in Scotland and England. The key inquiries asked by Fitzpatrick and Pawson (2007) are: who and what is social lodging for? Through an investigation of the previous 30 years and a depiction of the present social lodging arrangement in England, the article investigates the subject of access. The basic conundrum of future strategy and along these lines access to social lodging in England is clarified as the "proceeding with sense of duty regarding the 'security net' part" underscored in the 2000 Housing Green Paper and the "unequivocal desire" to give a more blended 'residency of decision' therefore augmenting the conceivable market. Fitzpatrick and Pawson allude to crafted by Stephens et al to characterize the key component of social lodging as an issue of access "decided based on 'managerial criteria' as opposed to simply 'evaluating proportioning'. They at that point go ahead to depict the changing condition of social lodging in England, lodging affiliation's expanding offer of stock, the falling number of leased properties by and large and the difference in age structure inside the part as vital components. The historical backdrop of the 'requirements based' portion frameworks utilizing the advancement of target point scoring prioritization is clarified as the dynamic conventionality of the twentieth Century which still stays pervasive in the present enactment and direction. A compact argument against needs-based portion is then furnished with the key focuses including residualisation and the coercive idea of such a framework prompting focuses pursuing conduct. This foundation gives a phenomenal setting to the progressions that happened in the late 1990s when "the standard 'accept the only choice available' social lodging portions display turned out to be progressively hard to protect in light of rising yearnings and desires of purchaser decision" (Mullins and Pawson, 2005, p138). Decision Based Letting (CBL) Schemes are given as present government reaction to create and open up the division by putting more accentuation on the client's decision, and as a methods for support for generally unacceptable or unwilling members in social lodging. Introductory discoveries demonstrate that defenseless gatherings are not being rejected by the new framework in spite of the fact that there are surely inquiries around the reasonableness and effect of a more decision drove approach's impacts on the poorest. In thinking about the situation of Social Housing in Scotland, the social lodging division in Britain has generally been concentrated and in this manner authentic variety in strategy and practice has been restricted. Notwithstanding, devolution and the establishment of enactment to set up the Scottish Parliament have prompted the open door for disparity inside both (Walker et al, 2003, p177). Give us now a chance to consider a portion of the similitudes and contrasts inside the Scottish and English social lodging segment as portrayed by Fitzpatrick and Pawson. It is vital to specify here that it is difficult to detail the greater part of the similitudes and contrasts and along these lines just the most clear and imperative have been decided for this talk. There has been a worldwide move towards private lodging arrangement in government strategy and thusly it is obvious that there are clear similitudes between the English setting depicted by Fitzpatrick and Pawson and the Scottish setting. A critical similitude is that lodging has ascended on the motivation and has been restored in both England and Scotland (Stirling and Smith, 2003), this might be because of its significance in tending to and meeting new developing group needs in the present social orders when so much accentuation is put on home proprietorship and steadiness. Another likeness is that both Scotland and England are confronting a junction (CIH, 2006) as the reasons for their social lodging segment contrast from those in the twentieth Century. The CIH, (2007) portrays this junction as a decision to either keep accommodating the lodging needs of the most helpless or enhance to meet a portion of the more extensive needs of the group with a scope of residency alternatives. This is the very same circumstance portrayed by Fitzpatrick and Pawson which brought about the CBL conspires in England. At last, and key to the requirement for an assessment of lodging strategy, is the changing statistic whom it is serving. Fitzpatrick and Pawson express that in England in excess of a fourth of all board occupants in 2003/2004 were no less than 70 years of age while in Scotland, single beneficiaries are the most widely recognized sort of family unit found in the part (CIH, 2006). As indicated by insights, this will change in future years, as the cutting edge is to a great extent a home owning populace who won't require the help of social lodging. The two areas are confronting an expansion of more youthful individuals as the new contestants into social lodging and with that come new needs and versatility designs. Fitzpatrick and Pawson express that normally more seasoned tenants "will have lived in the part their entire lives, their low penchant for versatility balancing out their nearby neighborhoods and residency in general". This will change in both England and Scotland and the likelihood of a more transient need in social lodging as talked about by Fitzpatrick and Pawson (2007) will be relevant. This improvement has been censured as a support of the perspective of social lodging as exclusively for the poorest and most defenseless gatherings and 'if all else fails' for lodging (Glynn, 2007). Adding to this emptying out of those taking an interest in the division in both England and Scotland, is the Right to Buy approach which energizes and underpins families who wish to buy their homes through managed plans. The Right to Buy implies that the financially capable are moving far from social leasing, bringing about the poorest and most helpless making up bigger rates of the social lodging area (Satsangi and Dunmore 2003, p202 and CIH, 2007, p7). With respect to contrasts in Scotland's social lodging area, Midwinter et al (1991) express that "there has been acknowledgment in Whitehall that Scotland's lodging needs are both subjectively and quantitatively unique in relation to England's" (p92). This is maybe more obvious since the devolution of parliament and in the distinction in strategies that are currently developing. Just a single distinction has been chosen for this dialog because of its centrality. In spite of the fact that the occupant premise of both England and Scotland are changing in comparable ways, the starkest contrast lies in the assignment procedure in the social lodging area. In England, as of now said, the CBL conspire is being steered and triumphs are being accounted for (Fitzpatrick and Pawson, 2007). Nonetheless, Scotland is as a rule substantially more mindful in its approach and is keeping to its rights based conventions (Stirling and Smith 2003, p156). The Homelessness Task Force clarify we are worried that (CBL plans) don't work in ways which deny vagrants the chance of taking an interest, or in ways which limit the load of lodging accessible for vagrants (CHI, 2002). One of the fundamental reasons for CBL plans is to present decision. The Scottish Government is improving candidate decision through Common Housing Registers (CHR) that will guarantee individuals have reasonable and open access to lodging records and evaluation forms while working with landowners to empower decision, reaction to require and the utilization of stock in lettings (Stirling and Smith 2003, p151). In the meantime, the Homelessness Act 2002 expels the obligation of experts in England to have an enroll by any stretch of the imagination (Stirling and Smith 2003, p156). Fitzpatrick and Pawson presume that in England "whatever the g>GET ANSWER