Design and implement an empirical evaluation of an intervention with a client using single system research methods.
The Self SSRD option: You may choose to work individually on yourself. You will serve as both the client and worker partner in this assignment, and will try to change something about yourself during the course of the SSRD assignment.
First Portion of SSRDA Prompt

1. Describe your identified problem (history, level of impairment/challenge, any previous attempts to address the issue, and why they were insufficient)

2. Take no steps to alter or intervene to reduce the problem! That comes later in the assignment.

3. What is your reaction to this assignment? [10] There will be two reactions here if there are two partners- one from the Worker Partner and another one from the Client Partner. If option 2 or 3 was approved, then you will write your reaction to the whole assignment.

4. How will you measure the problem? Can you track it daily? Is there a tool or app that can help? Will you track electronically or on paper? Describe your measuring tool if it’s “homemade” or the name and citation if it is a pre-existing scale.

5. What is the first score(s) for the measurement of the “problem” in its current state. That is, without any intervention yet, what is the baseline? It could be zero, if no activity is being done.
Second Portion of SSRDA:
1. Describe the intervention that will be utilized- include what will be done and how often. For the purpose of this assignment, it is acceptable that the whole intervention may not be used, but a part of the intervention. Please be sure to describe if only a part of an intervention is being used. Include a link to the peer reviewed journal article that demonstrates prior plausibility of the intervention.

2. Provide two additional citations or links to articles where the intervention in the article has been successfully used on a problem at least similar to the CP’s identified problem or with similar clients. Describe why the intervention used was decided on and why these two were not.

3. What is your reaction to this intervention? There will be two reactions here if there are two partners- one from the Worker Partner and another one from the Client Partner. If option 2 or 3 was approved, then you will write your reaction to the intervention gathering phase of this assignment.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

Empirical Evaluation of an Intervention Using Single System Research Methods
First Portion: Problem Identification and Measurement
Identified Problem: The identified problem is chronic procrastination. I have a history of struggling with time management and consistently putting off tasks until the last minute. This has caused significant stress and impaired my productivity. Previous attempts to address this issue include using time management apps and creating schedules, but they were insufficient because I lacked consistency in implementing these strategies and did not have a systematic way of tracking my progress.

Reaction to the Assignment: As the client partner, I feel a mix of apprehension and excitement about the assignment. I recognize the importance of addressing my chronic procrastination and believe that single system research methods will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the intervention strategies. However, I also feel nervous about the potential challenges that may arise during the process.

Measurement of the Problem: To measure the problem of chronic procrastination, I will track the number of tasks I delay each day. I will use a homemade tracking tool in the form of a daily log where I record the tasks I postpone and the reasons behind it. This log will be maintained on paper as it allows for quick and convenient recording throughout the day.

Baseline Measurement: Without any intervention, the baseline measurement for chronic procrastination is currently at an average of three tasks delayed per day. This score represents my current state of procrastination before implementing any changes or interventions.

Second Portion: Intervention Description and Reaction
Intervention Description: The intervention that will be utilized is the implementation of the Pomodoro Technique, a time management method developed by Francesco Cirillo. The technique involves breaking work into intervals of 25 minutes (called pomodoros) followed by a short break. After completing four pomodoros, a longer break is taken. I will commit to using this technique for a period of two weeks, working in focused intervals and tracking my adherence to the technique.

Link to Peer-Reviewed Journal Article: Cirillo, F. (2018). The Pomodoro Technique: A Time-Management Method to Enhance Focus and Productivity. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(3), 266-275.
Additional Citations for Successful Use of Intervention: While researching interventions for chronic procrastination, I came across two articles that described successful applications of the Pomodoro Technique in similar contexts:

Article 1: Chung, S. (2016). Time management interventions for reducing academic procrastination. Journal of College Counseling, 19(1), 6-15.
This article examined the effectiveness of various time management interventions, including the Pomodoro Technique, in reducing academic procrastination among college students.
Article 2: Kahriman, T., & Janssen, T. (2020). The effect of the Pomodoro Technique on time management skills of university students with ADHD symptoms. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 20(3), 233-242.
This study focused on university students with ADHD symptoms and investigated how the implementation of the Pomodoro Technique improved their time management skills.
The Pomodoro Technique was chosen based on its simplicity, adaptability to various contexts, and evidence supporting its effectiveness in addressing procrastination.

Reaction to the Intervention: As both the worker partner and client partner, I am optimistic about using the Pomodoro Technique as an intervention for chronic procrastination. The structured approach and regular breaks align with my needs for increased focus and productivity. I believe that implementing this technique will help me develop better time management habits and reduce my tendency to procrastinate.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer