Alice is the treasurer of the University’s Really Rubbish Football Club (URRFC), a football club for people who
enjoy playing football but who are not actually very good at it. The football club asks members to pay £10 to
join the society, and also asks for donations from members for social activities and events. It is also possible to
become an associate member for £5. Associate membership allows a person to attend the social events, but not
to participate in any of the matches.
They also charge a £1 admission fee for people to watch their matches, and there is a collection after every
match in order to pay for future events.
A plastic football worth £25 is awarded every year to the person who proves themselves to be the Really
Rubbish Football Club’s worst player.
Unfortunately however, the club has not been active in the last three years, and Alice and Bob, the club’s
secretary, have decided to bring the club to an end.
The club has two bank accounts in its name: ‘the club account’ into which all the membership fees, donations,
and admissions fees are paid. This account currently contains £200.
The second bank account contains £75 – which is the prize money in order to buy a football for the worst player.
No award has been made for the last three years.
1/5/2021 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing
The club currently consists of 10 members – 7 of these are full members, and the other 3 are associate members.
The money in the account therefore comprises of money they paid in order to be members, and also money paid
by former members who have left the university.
Please advise Alice and Bob on:
a. whether they are trustees for URRFC, and on what basis.
b. how the money in the two accounts should be distributed.
c. how would your answer to part b differ if Alice is the only surviving member
he previous year. From one viewpoint, distributed research progressively proposes that the exceptional yields on interests in advanced education are negligibly misrepresented and regularly even non-existent (Bryan Caplan’s point in his new The Case Against Education). The private individual increases from school don’t reflect much professionally significant adapting, but instead recognitions tell bosses that beneficiaries are more astute, progressively restrained, increasingly inspired laborers for reasons irrelevant to school expertise obtaining. This examination proposes that we are over-put resources into colleges, and that open appropriations for universities have a moderately low rate of return for the more extensive society. The second opposing pattern is a developing development to energize participation by making school “free.” States, for example, New York, Oregon and, maybe to some degree shockingly, Tennessee, have grasped the idea of free educational cost for junior college participation. The recently chosen New Jersey representative Phil Murphy has eagerly grasped the thought, first provoked most obviously by Bernie Sanders, to be financed in New Jersey by raising expenses on rich inhabitants, with the best rate on the salary charge going to 10.75% from 8.97%, just as expanding the business charge. There are some apparently great contentions with the expectation of complimentary junior college – we have free educational cost for eleventh and twelfth grade, why not thirteenth or fourteenth grade (junior college?) The expense of junior college is normally low – far not as much as that at traditional multi year colleges – and frequently even not exactly per student costs at some ludicrously wasteful extensive K-12 school locale. Thusly there is a case for prodding high-hazard understudies with hazardous scholarly records to go to these lower cost schools instead of costly four-year colleges, with simple exchange to the four-year schools if fruitful at the junior college level. There are likewise alluring contentions supporting those wishing to secure abilities like driving long separation trucks or welding, great paying professional employments in much interest.>GET ANSWER