Describe ethical considerations for healthcare professionals and medical researchers.
Apply ethical decision-making models to healthcare ethical dilemmas.
Evaluate legal issues in healthcare decision-making situations.

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Ethical Considerations for Healthcare Professionals and Medical Researchers

Both healthcare professionals and medical researchers operate within a framework of ethical principles designed to protect patients, research participants, and the integrity of the healthcare system and scientific inquiry. While some principles overlap, there are nuances specific to each role.

Ethical Considerations for Healthcare Professionals:

Healthcare professionals are primarily guided by principles that focus on the well-being of their patients. Key ethical considerations include:

  • Beneficence: The obligation to act in the best interest of the patient. This involves providing competent care, preventing harm, and promoting health and well-being.
  • Non-maleficence: The duty to do no harm. This principle requires healthcare professionals to avoid actions that could potentially harm patients or to minimize harm when it is unavoidable.
  • Autonomy: Respecting the patient’s right to make their own decisions about their healthcare. This includes providing sufficient information for informed consent and respecting their choices, even if they differ from the healthcare professional’s recommendations.
  • Justice: Treating all patients fairly and equitably, without bias based on factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or sexual orientation. This also involves the fair allocation of healthcare resources.
  • Fidelity: Maintaining trust and loyalty in the patient-professional relationship. This includes keeping promises, protecting patient confidentiality, and acting with integrity.
  • Veracity: Being truthful and honest with patients about their condition, treatment options, and prognosis.

Ethical Considerations for Healthcare Professionals and Medical Researchers

Both healthcare professionals and medical researchers operate within a framework of ethical principles designed to protect patients, research participants, and the integrity of the healthcare system and scientific inquiry. While some principles overlap, there are nuances specific to each role.

Ethical Considerations for Healthcare Professionals:

Healthcare professionals are primarily guided by principles that focus on the well-being of their patients. Key ethical considerations include:

  • Beneficence: The obligation to act in the best interest of the patient. This involves providing competent care, preventing harm, and promoting health and well-being.
  • Non-maleficence: The duty to do no harm. This principle requires healthcare professionals to avoid actions that could potentially harm patients or to minimize harm when it is unavoidable.
  • Autonomy: Respecting the patient’s right to make their own decisions about their healthcare. This includes providing sufficient information for informed consent and respecting their choices, even if they differ from the healthcare professional’s recommendations.
  • Justice: Treating all patients fairly and equitably, without bias based on factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or sexual orientation. This also involves the fair allocation of healthcare resources.
  • Fidelity: Maintaining trust and loyalty in the patient-professional relationship. This includes keeping promises, protecting patient confidentiality, and acting with integrity.
  • Veracity: Being truthful and honest with patients about their condition, treatment options, and prognosis.
  • Confidentiality: Protecting the privacy of patient information. This is a cornerstone of trust in the healthcare relationship and is also legally protected.

Ethical Considerations for Medical Researchers:

Medical researchers have a responsibility to conduct ethical research that advances medical knowledge while safeguarding the rights and well-being of research participants. Key ethical considerations include:

  • Social and Clinical Value: Research should address a question that is important for improving health or scientific understanding.
  • Scientific Validity: Research must be methodologically sound to ensure that the results are reliable and contribute meaningfully to knowledge.
  • Fair Subject Selection: Participants should be chosen based on the scientific goals of the study, not based on vulnerability or privilege. The opportunity to participate in research should be offered equitably.
  • Favorable Risk-Benefit Ratio: The potential benefits of the research must outweigh the risks to the participants. Researchers must minimize risks and maximize potential benefits.
  • Independent Review: Research protocols should be reviewed by an independent ethics committee (e.g., Institutional Review Board – IRB) to ensure ethical acceptability.
  • Informed Consent: Potential participants must be fully informed about the purpose, methods, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the research and must voluntarily agree to participate. 1 They should also be informed of their right to withdraw at any time without penalty.  
  • Respect for Potential and Enrolled Subjects: Researchers must respect the privacy, confidentiality, and well-being of participants throughout the study. This includes providing ongoing information and support.
  • Data Integrity and Honesty: Researchers must accurately collect, analyze, and report data. Fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism are serious ethical breaches.
  • Transparency and Disclosure: Researchers should disclose potential conflicts of interest and be transparent about their research methods and findings.

Applying Ethical Decision-Making Models to Healthcare Ethical Dilemmas

Ethical decision-making models provide a structured approach to analyzing complex ethical dilemmas in healthcare and arriving at justifiable courses of action. Several models exist, often sharing similar steps:

  1. Identify the Ethical Dilemma: Clearly define the ethical issue, including the conflicting values or principles involved.
  2. Gather Relevant Information: Collect all necessary facts about the situation, including the patient’s medical history, values, preferences, social context, and legal considerations.
  3. Identify the Stakeholders: Determine all individuals or groups who will be affected by the decision.
  4. Consider the Ethical Principles: Analyze the dilemma through the lens of relevant ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, fidelity, veracity). Identify which principles are in conflict.
  5. Brainstorm Possible Courses of Action: Generate a range of potential options to address the dilemma.
  6. Evaluate Each Option: Analyze the potential consequences (benefits and harms) of each option for all stakeholders, considering the ethical principles involved.
  7. Choose the Best Course of Action: Select the option that best balances the conflicting ethical principles and maximizes benefits while minimizing harms, based on the specific context and values.
  8. Implement and Evaluate the Decision: Put the chosen course of action into practice and reflect on the outcome. Be prepared to modify the approach if necessary.

Examples of Ethical Decision-Making Models:

  • The Four Topics Approach (Jonsen, Siegler, & Winslade): Focuses on Medical Indications, Patient Preferences, Quality of Life, and Contextual Features.
  • The Principlist Approach (Beauchamp & Childress): Emphasizes the four core principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.
  • The Virtue Ethics Approach: Focuses on the moral character and virtues of the healthcare professional.
  • The Care Ethics Approach: Emphasizes relationships, empathy, and the needs of the patient within their social context.
  • The MORAL Model: M – Massage the dilemma (gather info), O – Outline the options, R – Review the criteria and resolve, A – Affirm position and act, L – Look back and evaluate.

The choice of model may depend on the specific ethical dilemma and the individual preferences of the healthcare professional. The key is to use a systematic and thoughtful process to ensure ethical reasoning.

Evaluating Legal Issues in Healthcare Decision-Making Situations

Legal issues are intricately linked with ethical considerations in healthcare decision-making. Healthcare professionals must be aware of relevant laws and regulations that can impact patient care and their practice. Key legal issues include:

  • Informed Consent: The legal requirement to obtain a patient’s voluntary agreement to a proposed treatment or procedure after disclosing relevant information, including the nature of the intervention, its risks and benefits, alternatives, and the right to refuse. Failure to obtain informed consent can lead to legal liability (e.g., battery, negligence).
  • Patient Confidentiality and Privacy: Protected under laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the US. Healthcare professionals must safeguard patient health information and only disclose it as legally permitted. Breaches of confidentiality can result in legal penalties.
  • Medical Malpractice: Healthcare professionals have a legal duty to provide care that meets the accepted standard of practice. Failure to do so that results in harm to the patient can lead to malpractice lawsuits.
  • Advance Directives: Legal documents (e.g., living wills, durable power of attorney for healthcare) that allow competent adults to express their wishes regarding future medical treatment or to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf if they become incapacitated. Healthcare professionals must respect valid advance directives.
  • End-of-Life Care: Legal and ethical complexities arise in decisions about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, physician-assisted suicide (where legal), and euthanasia (generally illegal in the US). Laws vary by jurisdiction and require careful consideration.
  • Guardianship and Conservatorship: Legal processes for appointing individuals to make healthcare decisions for those deemed legally incompetent.
  • Reporting Requirements: Laws mandate the reporting of certain events, such as suspected child or elder abuse, communicable diseases, and certain types of injuries.
  • Scope of Practice: Laws and regulations define the permissible activities for different healthcare professions. APRNs/DNPs must practice within their legally defined scope.
  • Antidiscrimination Laws: Laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibit discrimination in healthcare based on disability.

When faced with a healthcare decision-making situation, healthcare professionals should consider the following legal aspects:

  • Does the patient have the legal capacity to make this decision?
  • Has informed consent been obtained or is it necessary?
  • Are there any relevant advance directives in place?
  • Are there any legal reporting requirements related to this situation?
  • Does the proposed course of action comply with the relevant scope of practice and legal standards of care?
  • Are there any potential legal risks associated with different options?

In complex situations with legal implications, seeking legal counsel or consulting with risk management departments within healthcare organizations is crucial. Understanding the legal framework helps healthcare professionals navigate challenging ethical dilemmas while protecting themselves and their patients.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer