Ethical Considerations of Terminating an Employee for Off-Duty Conduct

Title: Ethical Considerations of Terminating an Employee for Off-Duty Conduct Introduction The termination of an employee for off-duty conduct raises important ethical questions regarding the balance between an individual’s right to free expression and an employer’s right to protect its reputation. In the case of Juli Briskman, who was terminated by her employer, Akima, for expressing her dissent towards President Trump’s motorcade while off-duty, it is crucial to determine whether her termination was ethically appropriate. This essay will explore the ethical dimensions of the case, considering relevant course concepts and principles to justify a response. Furthermore, it will attempt to draw general lessons and guidelines regarding when and under what circumstances an employer can terminate an employee for off-duty conduct. Ethical Analysis Freedom of Expression: One crucial ethical principle to consider is an individual’s right to freedom of expression. As citizens, employees have the right to express their opinions and engage in political activities outside of work. Briskman’s act of raising her middle finger to the President’s motorcade was an expression of her political dissent. However, this freedom of expression is not without limitations. Employees must be aware that their actions may reflect upon their employer’s reputation. Reputation and Brand Image: Employers have a legitimate interest in protecting their reputation and brand image. A company’s public perception can have significant financial implications. Therefore, employers may argue that employees’ off-duty conduct, especially when it becomes widely known, can impact the brand image and potentially harm business interests. In Briskman’s case, Akima may have considered her action as potentially damaging to their reputation, leading to her termination. Impact on Workplace Environment: Another aspect to consider is whether an employee’s off-duty conduct has a direct impact on the workplace environment. If an employee’s actions outside of work create a hostile or toxic atmosphere within the workplace, it may be ethically justifiable for the employer to intervene. However, in Briskman’s case, her off-duty conduct did not have any direct impact on her workplace environment. Her action was a personal expression of her political views that she did not bring into the workplace. Employment Contracts and Policies: The terms of employment contracts and company policies play a crucial role in determining whether an employer can terminate an employee for off-duty conduct. If an employment contract explicitly states that an employee can be terminated for actions that negatively affect the employer’s reputation, then Briskman’s termination may be seen as ethically appropriate. However, if such clauses are absent or unclear, it raises questions about the fairness of the termination. General Lessons and Guidelines Based on this analysis, several general lessons and guidelines can be drawn regarding when and under what circumstances an employer can terminate an employee for off-duty conduct: Employers should have clear and explicit policies regarding off-duty conduct that may impact the company’s reputation. There should be a direct link between an employee’s off-duty conduct and its potential impact on the workplace environment or the employer’s reputation. Employers should consider alternative responses such as counseling or reassignment before resorting to termination. The proportionality of the employer’s response should be assessed. Termination should be considered a last resort when other reasonable alternatives are not feasible. Conclusion In the case of Juli Briskman, Akima’s termination of her employment raises ethical questions about the balance between freedom of expression and an employer’s right to protect its reputation. While employers have a legitimate interest in safeguarding their brand image, it is essential to consider factors such as the impact on workplace environment and the clarity of employment contracts and policies. Drawing from this case, employers should adopt clear guidelines that strike a balance between employee rights and organizational interests. By doing so, they can navigate situations involving off-duty conduct in a fair and ethically appropriate manner.

Sample Answer