You are currently a high-ranking military officer who is in charge of a major defense bidding project. You have total authority from the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) to make the final decision between two remaining competitors (Boeing and Airbus). Analyzed data shows that the Airbus offering is the higher performer at a lower cost over the life of the project (saving the American tax payer billions of dollars). But Boeing is an American company and Airbus is a European company. However, Airbus indicated their willingness to build the airplane in the US.
Once this contract is awarded, you are retiring from the Air Force after 20 years of service and plan to begin your 2nd career in the private sector.
Through a series of conversations and emails with corporate level executives you have been assured a highly ranked and extremely lucrative financial position with the company if you should decide to give the contract to Boeing.
What are your options? What is the core ethical dilemma? What action would you take? How did ethics assist you in making this decision? What Christian values formulated your ethical framework? Is there a biblical principle or theme you can apply here? (use scripture references if they apply)
Web, the World Wide Web and PCs have turned into a generally acknowledged guide in instruction and their impact in about all circles of human presence is continually expanding. The web gives access to an extensive variety of material that can be promptly gotten to with a couple of snaps. Despite the fact that the simple inquiry ability innate in the intrinsic is exceptionally gainful for specialists, there is likewise a propensity which has been broadly revealed among the youthful understudies to enjoy scholastic unscrupulousness by reordering material into their assignments without satisfactorily understanding the substance or recognizing its unique source. Such practices which have been among the most generally announced maltreatment of the web and which have been known as literary theft have made numerous instructors express their worry. In any case, literary theft isn't the main abuse of PCs, the web and the World Wide Web which has been seen at scholastic foundations. The abuse of PCs, the web and the World Wide Web is liable to consistent advancement as unpracticed clients and the malevolent virtuoso keep on springing new amazements. Digital law is additionally continually being changed to consider new practices which might be translated similar to an abuse of the web. Numerous practices in which web clients may enjoy and which might be interpreted to be an abuse if the web can render people subject to criminal risk. It is, along these lines, imperative to guarantee that all web clients are sufficiently instructed and educated about the abuse of PCs, the web and the World Wide Web. This exposition investigates the abuse of the web in scholastic foundations and what should be possible to lessen the frequency of such abuse. The utilization of the web and the World Wide Web has seen a monstrous increment all through the world since it is conceivable to promptly spread data, look for particular data or content and quickly convey over huge separations for a moderately little cost utilizing the new mediums (Case, 2002, Pp. 1) and (Solarz, 2002, Pp, 29 39). Web and the World Wide Web have likewise observed a developing use in training, particularly for separation learning and in displaying on the web courses. Most scholastic establishments utilize the web or the World Wide Web to differing degrees for their scholarly exercises (Gearhart, 2000, Pp. 1 10). Be that as it may, similar to some other device, the web and the World Wide Web are likewise subject to abuse, particularly by the generally unpracticed clients, who are for the most part understudies at scholarly establishments. The most generally talked about abuse of the web and the World Wide Web which has been exhibited in writing is written falsification or copyright encroachment. This alludes to understudies reordering material for their research projects or assignments from sources on the World Wide Web, without sufficiently recognizing the sources utilized and consequently asserting the work to be their own (Anderson, 2000, Pp. 1 10), (Clough, 2000, Pp. 1 15), (Weiner, 1998, Pp. 1) and (Davidson, 2004, Pp. 1). In spite of the fact that understudies and other scholarly clients of the web are permitted to scan for information on the web, comprehend the material, extricate thoughts and afterward disk this information in their work in the wake of recognizing the wellspring of such thoughts, minor reordering with no comprehension does not help picking up, coming about just in a quick review which would then be able to be submitted for the honor of imprints or credits. Research papers, articles, expositions and activities are promptly accessible on the web for downloading and may likewise be composed by different scholars for a charge. Be that as it may, there is a scarce difference partitioning great and shrewdness with respect to such materials which are generally accessible on the World Wide Web. An understudy or analyst may utilize such material to pick up bits of knowledge into a scholastic inquiry or to pick up a comprehension of what is accessible in the writing, and also to see how other people who might be more experienced may have handled a scholarly issue. Such a methodology may help with learning and can be viewed as like looking for the help of a mentor for assisting with individual learning. It is ordinarily expected that an understudy or a specialist will utilize the accessible material on the web and endeavor to enhance it by including their very own bits of knowledge. Such a procedure can help in genuine learning. All things considered, nobody is conceived with all the information and the learning which an understudy procures needs to originate from some place. Wellsprings of learning and data incorporate course books, instructor's notes, instructional exercises or numerous different sources, for example, varying media material, with augmentations to the current information base that is accessible to humankind being moderately uncommon and rare. Be that as it may, downloading pre composed material from the web or having it composed by another creator and submitting such material as one's very own is scholarly untrustworthiness which does not extraordinarily help learning. Indeed, even a coach who encourages an understudy in an up close and personal experience can finish a task for their student, who would then be able to hand this in as the understudy's very own work, however no genuine mentor will do a wonder such as this and most will endeavor to make the issues or the subject clearer to an understudy, which is the thing that instructing is about. Instructing includes making issues, which might be perplexing for an understudy, clearer and less demanding to grasp and additionally introducing new thoughts and material which might be most important for a phase of psychological advancement and expanding on establishments of information or learning. The material accessible on the World Wide Web aids this procedure of learning since it is promptly accessible and rapidly available (Gearhart, 2000, Pp. 1 – 20). Despite the fact that literary theft or scholastic deceiving has been so broadly talked about, this is in no way, shape or form the main abuse of the web which is to be found in scholarly organizations or at work in business (Langelier, 1997, Pp. 34 39) and (Charlesworth, 1996, Pp. 6 41). This exposition endeavors to investigate the abuse of the web and the World Wide Web in scholastic foundations and what can be done with the end goal to limit such maltreatment. Albeit a few innovation and authorizations based methodologies are accessible to deflect web abuse, the most proper first way to deal with decrease the expansion of such abuse is by teaching web clients and understudies at scholarly establishments. Teachers and chairmen of scholastic organizations have a specific obligation to instruct new clients and understudies about what is viewed as great web behavior, what is unsuitable, how certain activities may result in a web client abusing the law and what can the law do to the individuals who might be discovered liable of specific offenses. While programming for filtering works submitted against a great many pages or duplicating in a class are accessible, the individuals who are required to submit assignments ought to likewise realize how to introduce legitimate references in their work. Understudies ought to likewise be made mindful of the way that the premise of all information is truth and that human advancement couldn't have been conceivable without trustworthiness and truth in all perceptions, scholastic compositions and additionally in the revealing of test results. It is additionally liable to be useful if understudies are made mindful of the motivation behind why they may have been requested to present a task, what they are probably going to pick up because of sincerely endeavoring to finish a task and how they may look for help of mentors or material accessible on the World Wide Web to finish their assignments or research. They ought to likewise realize that except if they endeavor to learn through their diligent work, examination and additionally interest, no coach or material on the World Wide Web is probably going to be of any genuine help. The individuals who do look for help from sources outside of their own endeavors are relied upon to try true endeavors to enhance what they can get and albeit all learning must be looked for from some place e.g. from reading material, reference books, proficient people, abstract diaries, or the World Wide Web, just legit and also true close to home endeavors, addressing, contemplating or believing are probably going to create an again in close to home information, enhance the judgment and also add to astuteness. Teachers should endeavor to talk about a scholastic foundation's written falsification and swindling arrangements with the individuals who are related with the organization and urge others how the philosophical idea of truth and its definition which had been formed in the seasons of the early scholars, for example, Socrates and Plato helped humankind to advance (Weiner, 1998, 'Identifying and Discouraging Internet Academic Misconduct') and (Hricko, 1998, Pp. 1).>GET ANSWER