Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Ethical Dilemma in Healthcare: The Case of Informed Consent
Introduction
In the realm of healthcare, professionals often encounter complex ethical dilemmas that challenge their commitment to patient care while upholding moral and legal standards. One of the most pressing ethical dilemmas arises around the issue of informed consent. This dilemma can manifest when a patient is unable to fully understand the implications of a medical procedure or treatment due to language barriers, cognitive impairments, or cultural differences. This essay presents a solution to this ethical dilemma, emphasizing the importance of clear communication, patient advocacy, and collaborative decision-making.
The Ethical Dilemma
Informed consent is a fundamental principle in healthcare, requiring that patients provide voluntary agreement to a treatment after being adequately informed about its risks, benefits, and alternatives. However, situations often arise where patients may not fully comprehend the information provided by healthcare professionals. For instance, a non-English speaking patient may struggle to understand the nuances of a surgical procedure, or a patient with cognitive impairments may be unable to grasp the potential risks involved.
This scenario creates an ethical dilemma for healthcare professionals: how can they ensure that patients are truly informed and capable of making decisions about their own care? Failing to secure informed consent can lead to legal repercussions and undermine the trust between patient and provider. Conversely, overly paternalistic approaches may strip patients of their autonomy and right to make choices about their own health.
Proposed Solution
1. Enhancing Communication Strategies
To address this ethical dilemma, healthcare professionals must prioritize effective communication strategies tailored to each patient’s unique needs. This includes:
– Utilizing Professional Interpreters: For patients with language barriers, engaging professional interpreters ensures accurate communication of medical information and fosters understanding. Family members should not be relied upon for interpretation due to potential biases or lack of medical knowledge.
– Employing Visual Aids and Simplified Language: Healthcare providers should utilize visual aids (such as diagrams and videos) and avoid technical jargon when explaining procedures. This approach can enhance understanding for patients with varying literacy levels or cognitive abilities.
2. Patient Advocacy and Involvement
Healthcare professionals must act as advocates for their patients’ rights and well-being. This involves:
– Encouraging Questions: Providers should create an open environment where patients feel comfortable asking questions about their treatment options. This engagement helps clarify any uncertainties and promotes informed decision-making.
– Involving Family Members or Caregivers: When appropriate, involving family members or caregivers in discussions can provide additional support for the patient. They can help ensure that the patient understands the information presented and can aid in decision-making.
3. Collaborative Decision-Making
Implementing a collaborative decision-making model empowers patients while ensuring they receive adequate information. This approach includes:
– Shared Decision-Making Tools: Utilizing decision aids that present information about treatment options clearly can help patients weigh the risks and benefits in conjunction with their healthcare providers.
– Respecting Patient Autonomy: Even when patients may not fully comprehend the implications of their choices, healthcare professionals should respect their autonomy by involving them in discussions about their care. This reinforces the principle that patients have the right to make informed decisions regarding their health.
4. Continuous Training for Healthcare Professionals
Finally, ongoing training programs for healthcare professionals can enhance their skills in communication, cultural competence, and ethical decision-making. Regular workshops can equip providers with strategies to navigate complex scenarios involving informed consent effectively.
Conclusion
The ethical dilemma surrounding informed consent in healthcare is multifaceted and requires a sensitive, well-rounded approach. By enhancing communication strategies, advocating for patient involvement, promoting collaborative decision-making, and providing continuous training for healthcare professionals, we can create an environment where patients feel empowered and informed about their treatment options. This solution not only upholds ethical standards but also fosters trust in the patient-provider relationship, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Through these efforts, healthcare professionals can navigate the complexities of informed consent while respecting the autonomy and dignity of every patient they serve.
