Ethical to create unrealistic expectations during the visualization step of a speech
Doreen is delivering a speech on the topic of donating money to help feed the children of AIDS victims in Africa. She set up her speech using Monroe’s motivated sequence. She sails through attention, needs, and satisfaction. She starts delivering her visualization step, and she goes a little crazy. She claims that if more people would donate to this cause, the world would be devoid of hunger, children in Africa could all get an education, and we could establish world peace. She then makes claims that not feeding the children of AIDS victims in Africa could lead to world chaos and nuclear war.
1. Is it ethical to create unrealistic expectations during the visualization step?
2. Should you try to exaggerate the visualization stage if you know, realistically, that the possible outcomes are not that impressive?
3. If Doreen was your friend, how would you respond to this section of her speech? Should you point out that her argument is unethical?
It is not ethical to create unrealistic expectations during the visualization step of a speech. The purpose of the visualization step is to provide a vivid picture of the potential positive outcomes that could result from taking action. However, it is important to ensure that these outcomes are grounded in reality and supported by evidence. By presenting unrealistic and exaggerated claims, Doreen is misleading her audience and potentially manipulating their emotions to gain support for her cause.
No, one should not try to exaggerate the visualization stage if they know that the possible outcomes are not that impressive. While it may be tempting to embellish the potential benefits in order to persuade others, it is crucial to maintain honesty and integrity in presenting information. Exaggerating the visualization stage not only undermines the credibility of the speaker but also diminishes the trust of the audience. It is better to focus on presenting realistic and achievable goals rather than resorting to exaggeration.
If Doreen was my friend, I would respond to this section of her speech by addressing the unethical nature of her argument. It is important to have an open and honest conversation about the importance of presenting accurate information and avoiding manipulative tactics when advocating for a cause. I would point out that creating unrealistic expectations not only damages her credibility but also undermines the overall effectiveness of her message. Encouraging her to focus on the legitimate needs and potential solutions instead of resorting to exaggeration would be a more ethical approach.