Apply two (no more, no less) of the moral frameworks we have learned about to your case study – that is,
use these theories to explain what the main moral failure or failures are in the case study. (Is it only one
big failure, or is it a bunch of little ones?) The frameworks you can use are: utilitarianism, human rights
(as articulated by the UN’s Universal Declaration and Ian’s Guidelines for Reasoning with Human Rights),
Rawls’ theory of justice, Anderson’s remarks about private government, Superson’s theory of sexual
harassment, stockholder theory, and stakeholder theory. Be specific in how you apply the two theories.
For example, if you apply utilitarianism, it’s not enough to say “this is wrong because it makes people
unhappy”; you also have to say why or how it makes people unhappy. Similarly, if you apply human rights,
it’s not enough to say “this behavior violated so-and-so’s human rights”; you have to say which right(s) it
violated and how it violated them. If you think there is something else that is morally important about the
case study (e.g. something that is fishy to you, but that your two frameworks ignore), briefly explain what
that is and why you think it’s important at the end of the paper.
Sample Solution
