What are the benefits of evaluating the role of outcomes in practice change through research? Discuss how you would evaluate the roles of outcomes through a change proposed from research findings.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Evaluating the Role of Outcomes in Practice Change through Research
Thesis Statement
Evaluating the role of outcomes in practice change through research is essential for ensuring that interventions are effective, sustainable, and beneficial to stakeholders. A systematic approach to evaluation not only enhances the quality of practice change but also fosters an evidence-based culture that can lead to improved patient care and organizational performance.
Introduction
In the realm of healthcare, education, and other professional fields, practice change is often driven by new research findings. However, the successful implementation of these changes is contingent upon a thorough evaluation of their outcomes. Understanding how outcomes influence practice change allows organizations to assess the effectiveness of interventions, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that changes align with their goals. This essay will discuss the benefits of evaluating outcomes in practice change and outline a framework for conducting such evaluations based on research findings.
Benefits of Evaluating Outcomes
1. Evidence-Based Decision Making
Evaluating outcomes provides empirical evidence that can guide decision-making processes. By analyzing data on the effectiveness of a proposed change, practitioners can make informed choices that are backed by research rather than anecdotal evidence.
2. Improved Patient Care
In healthcare settings, evaluating outcomes directly impacts patient care quality. By assessing how changes affect patient health indicators, satisfaction, and overall experience, organizations can refine practices to better meet patient needs.
3. Enhanced Accountability
Outcomes evaluation fosters accountability among stakeholders. When organizations measure the impacts of practice changes, they create a transparent system where successes and failures are documented, leading to improved organizational practices and resource allocation.
4. Continuous Improvement
Through ongoing outcome evaluations, organizations can create a culture of continuous improvement. Regular assessment allows for adjustments to be made in real-time, ensuring that practices remain relevant and effective over time.
5. Stakeholder Engagement
Involving stakeholders in the evaluation process encourages collaboration and buy-in. When stakeholders see tangible outcomes from changes made based on research, they are more likely to support future initiatives.
Framework for Evaluating Outcomes from Research Findings
To effectively evaluate the role of outcomes in practice change derived from research findings, one can follow these steps:
Step 1: Define Clear Objectives
Begin by outlining specific objectives related to the proposed change. What outcomes are expected? These should be measurable and aligned with organizational goals.
Step 2: Develop Evaluation Criteria
Establish criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the change. This may include quantitative measures (e.g., patient recovery rates) and qualitative assessments (e.g., patient satisfaction surveys).
Step 3: Collect Baseline Data
Before implementing the change, gather baseline data to understand the current state. This serves as a reference point against which the outcomes of the new practice can be compared.
Step 4: Implement Change
Execute the proposed practice change while ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of new protocols and procedures.
Step 5: Monitor and Measure Outcomes
After implementing the change, continuously monitor the defined outcomes using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Utilize tools such as surveys, focus groups, and performance metrics.
Step 6: Analyze Data
Once sufficient data has been collected, analyze it to assess whether the outcomes align with the original objectives. Identify any discrepancies and explore reasons behind them.
Step 7: Report Findings
Communicate the results of the evaluation to all stakeholders involved. Highlight successes, challenges faced, and lessons learned during the implementation process.
Step 8: Revise and Improve
Based on the evaluation findings, make necessary adjustments to improve the practice change. This iterative process helps ensure that practices evolve based on real-world evidence.
Conclusion
Evaluating the role of outcomes in practice change is fundamental for organizations aiming to implement evidence-based interventions successfully. The benefits—ranging from enhanced decision-making to improved patient care—underscore the importance of a systematic approach to evaluation. By rigorously assessing outcomes based on research findings, organizations can foster a culture of accountability and continuous improvement, ultimately leading to better practices that effectively meet the needs of all stakeholders involved.
