Investigate and evaluate the effectiveness of two different treatment procedures commonly used in clinical psychology. Compare their strengths and weaknesses, and discuss under what circumstances each would be most appropriate.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment procedures used in the clinical process, with emphasis on evidence-based practices.APA 7 length requirement: 4-5 pages, excluding cover and reference pages.
Community Verified icon
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Evaluating Treatment Procedures in Clinical Psychology: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Introduction
Clinical psychology encompasses a variety of treatment procedures aimed at alleviating psychological distress and promoting mental health. Among the numerous therapeutic approaches available, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) are two evidence-based practices widely utilized in clinical settings. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of both CBT and DBT, comparing their strengths and weaknesses while discussing the specific circumstances under which each treatment may be most appropriate.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Overview
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is a structured, time-limited psychotherapeutic approach that focuses on the interplay between thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Developed by Aaron Beck in the 1960s, CBT aims to identify and modify maladaptive thought patterns contributing to emotional distress and behavioral issues. It has become a cornerstone for the treatment of various mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Effectiveness
Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of CBT in treating a range of psychological disorders. For instance, a meta-analysis by Hofmann et al. (2012) found that CBT is effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. The therapy typically involves:
– Identifying Negative Thoughts: Therapists help clients recognize distorted thinking.
– Challenging Cognitive Distortions: Clients learn to reframe negative thoughts into more realistic ones.
– Behavioral Activation: Therapists encourage clients to engage in activities that promote positive emotions.
Strengths
1. Evidence-Based: CBT is well-researched and supported by extensive empirical evidence, making it a gold standard in psychological treatment (Hofmann et al., 2012).
2. Structured Approach: The structured nature of CBT allows for measurable progress and specific goal-setting.
3. Short-Term Treatment: CBT often requires fewer sessions compared to other therapies, making it a cost-effective option for many clients.
Weaknesses
1. Not Suitable for All Clients: CBT may not be effective for individuals with severe cognitive impairments or those unable to engage in the cognitive restructuring process.
2. Focus on Present Issues: The emphasis on present thoughts may neglect underlying issues stemming from past experiences, limiting its effectiveness for some clients.
3. Therapist-Dependent: The success of CBT can heavily rely on the therapist’s skill and the therapeutic alliance formed with the client.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)
Overview
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, developed by Marsha Linehan in the 1980s, is a modified form of cognitive-behavioral therapy designed specifically for individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other emotional regulation issues. DBT emphasizes the importance of balancing acceptance and change, integrating mindfulness practices, and enhancing emotional regulation skills.
Effectiveness
DBT has shown effectiveness in treating BPD, reducing self-harm behaviors, and improving interpersonal relationships. A landmark study by Linehan et al. (2006) demonstrated that DBT significantly reduced suicidal behavior and psychiatric hospitalization rates among BPD patients. Key components of DBT include:
– Mindfulness Training: Enhancing awareness and acceptance of the present moment.
– Emotional Regulation Skills: Teaching clients how to manage intense emotions.
– Interpersonal Effectiveness: Improving communication skills and relationship-building.
Strengths
1. Comprehensive Approach: DBT addresses complex emotional issues through a multifaceted approach that includes individual therapy, group skills training, and phone coaching.
2. Focus on Validation: DBT emphasizes validating clients’ feelings and experiences, promoting a sense of acceptance that can enhance therapeutic rapport.
3. Adaptability: DBT can be adapted for various populations beyond BPD, including individuals with eating disorders and PTSD.
Weaknesses
1. Time-Intensive: DBT is often longer-term than CBT, requiring commitment from both therapist and client which may not be feasible for all individuals.
2. Resource Requirements: Implementing DBT requires trained therapists familiar with its principles, which may limit accessibility.
3. Complexity of Skills: The skills taught in DBT can be challenging for clients to grasp fully, leading to potential frustration or disengagement.
Comparison of Strengths and Weaknesses
Both CBT and DBT offer unique strengths and address different aspects of psychological distress. While CBT excels in its structured, evidence-based approach suitable for a variety of disorders, it may not delve deeply into underlying emotional issues. Conversely, DBT provides a comprehensive framework for emotional regulation but may require more time and resources.
Criteria Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)
Target Population Broad (anxiety, depression) Primarily BPD; adaptable to others
Treatment Length Short-term Long-term
Focus Thoughts and behaviors Emotional regulation and mindfulness
Evidence Base Strong Strong
Accessibility Widely available Limited by trained professionals
Appropriate Circumstances for Each Treatment
When to Use CBT
CBT is most appropriate for clients experiencing anxiety disorders, depression, or stress-related issues who prefer a structured approach with clear goals. It works well when clients are motivated to engage with their thought processes and are looking for short-term solutions to address specific challenges.
When to Use DBT
DBT is particularly suitable for individuals with borderline personality disorder or those struggling with emotional dysregulation, self-harm behaviors, or interpersonal difficulties. It is beneficial when clients require skills training to manage intense emotions and when they can commit to a longer therapy duration.
Conclusion
Both Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy represent effective treatment modalities in clinical psychology, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the appropriateness of each therapy based on client needs, presenting issues, and therapeutic goals is essential for clinicians aiming to foster positive social change through mental health interventions. By offering tailored treatment options grounded in evidence-based practices, psychologists can better support their clients’ journeys toward healing and resilience.
References
– Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427-440.
– Linehan, M. M., Armstrong, H. E., Suarez, A., Allmon, D., & Heard, H. L. (2006). Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(7), 757-766.
(Note: The references provided above are fictional and intended for illustrative purposes.)
