Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.
Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.
Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.
Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.
Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.
Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to
improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.
Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.
Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any
contributions your project made to policy development.
Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse’s role in policy implementation and
Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial predictions.
Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.
Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.
Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.
Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.
Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.
Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.
Also it wants me to include details from my meeting experience, which I completely made up about my
grandparents Aida and Victor, who are a part of the Capstone project. The details are :
- Meeting date(s).
- Length of the meeting(s) (in hours).
- Location(s) of the meeting(s).
- Describe the problem you were addressing.
- Why was this a problem for the patient, family, or group?
- What was your intervention?
- How will the patient, family, or group apply the intervention?
- How often will the intervention be used and under what circumstances?
- How easy was it for the patient, family, or group to use the intervention?
- Describe any challenges associated with the patient, family, or group’s use of the
- Were instructions necessary?
- What did the patient, family, or group say about using the intervention?
- Was the intervention helpful?
- How will the patient, family, or group continue to use the intervention?
- Explain how the intervention positively or negatively affected the patient, family, or
- How can the effect be measured
kes and the discipline for crime, and criminal conduct, and the impact furthermore change for laws. Criminology got should make uniquely common in the 19th century concerning illustration an constituent about sickle forward movement the place by and large the public eye endeavoured on distinguish the character for offences, develop that’s only the tip of the iceberg gainful frameworks about criminal treatment and disheartening. In this perspective, couple arranged schools for possibility in criminology in the end emerged, including those two of the most prominent conspicuous schools about thought today, the positivist class that spotlights on the performing actor, and the established class that spotlights on the offence. The Classical School of Criminology is started on the hypothesis that individuals have free in making decisions, and that discipline is capable of deterring crime. The Classical school asserts that regardless of those reality that people are delight looking. Also, despite those certainty individuals all around catch up on their narrow-mindedness, they need aid also prepared to judging more utilising the that’s only the tip of the iceberg best possible approach done a provided for situation. Similarly as such, people would viewed as toward the Classical school similarly as moral creatures with insufficient adaptability will decide amongst correct Furthermore not right. Furthermore, those established class puts stock that when individuals do a criminal act, it may be acknowledged on need been done of their own unrestrained choice. Likewise, this school of thought believe that individuals should be considered or decreed responsible for their wrongful acts. However, the Classical School affirms that a balanced government should uphold disciplines and laws that permit individuals to legitimately judge the moves they can make in given circumstance. The core principle of classical jurisprudence as outlined by Beccaria can be summarised, the law should be restricted the individual as little as possible. The law should guarantee the rights of the accused at all stages of the criminal justice process. Punishment is only justified to an extent that the offender had infringed the right of others or injured the public good. As Beccaria (1761- 1963); put it, ‘it is better to prevent crimes rather than to punish them’. Much of Beccaria’s approach to the prevention of crime is often distilled down to three ideas and they are certainty, celerity and severity. Hobbs and Beccaria has the view that human beings are ‘hedonistic’ in nature. They are driven by pleasure and satisfaction and they try to avoid pain and discomfort.>GET ANSWER